Policy 6.6: Strategic Sites

Showing comments and forms 1 to 18 of 18

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13531

Received: 22/03/2016

Respondent: Essex Bridleways Association

Representation Summary:

Policy 6.6 - Strategic Sites

Dunton Hills Garden Village - We request therefore that these green links are accessible to all - pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians - rather than just pedestrians and cyclists.

Brentwood Enterprise Park (Policies 101A and 101B) - we request that this park is planned appropriately so that the existing bridleway network in this vicinity is protected; the current enforcement issues with regard to the bridleways in this area are regularised, and a safe crossing of both the M25 and A127 is provided as part of this development, linking the bridleway networks either side of the M25.

Full text:

Policy 6.6 - Strategic Sites

Dunton Hills Garden Village - we note that the Council wishes to establish green links from this new development to the rest of Brentwood Borough. We request therefore that these green links are accessible to all - pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians - rather than just pedestrians and cyclists.

Brentwood Enterprise Park (Policies 101A and 101B) - we note the proposal to regularise and expand the employment-led development at the junction of the M25/A127 and request that this park is planned appropriately so that the existing bridleway network in this vicinity is protected; the current enforcement issues with regard to the bridleways in this area are regularised, and a safe crossing of both the M25 and A127 is provided as part of this development, linking the bridleway networks either side of the M25.

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13605

Received: 23/03/2016

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

Detailed consideration of setting will be a matter of material importance and such considerations are a constituent part of Local Plan policy 9.5 'Listed Buildings' and policy 6.3 (g) when considering the impact upon the significance of the asset.

Historic England recommends that further investigation is required including characterisation work to inform the evidence base. This work will inform the historic environment evidence base consistent with paragraph 169 of the National Planning Policy Framework. Historic England has published guidance which deals with historic characterisation in local and neighbourhood plans.

Historic England would conclude that the need for characterisation work will be fundamental to understanding the capacity of development in the Dunton Hills Garden Suburb.

Full text:

Policy 6.1 Sustainable Development

Policy 6.3 General Development Criteria, especially at (g) 'when considering the impact of development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, greater weight should be given to the assets conservation and enhancement'.

Policy 6.6 Strategic Sites and 7.1 Housing-Led policy (confirming a housing led scheme at Dunton Hills Garden Village of up to 2,500 dwellings).

Paragraph 6.32 confirms West Horndon is removed as a strategic allocation for growth to protect the village settlement.

Paragraph 7.1 mentions the use of master plans to agree the form, mix and siting of development.

Paragraph 7.35 notes that at Dunton Hills Garden Village that not all of the landholding will be developed.

Historic England Representations:

Historic England notes that the West Horndon village development area is not now a preferred option. This is consistent with the preferred options consultation (2015) where it was stated that only one of either West Hornton or Dunton would be pursued. Historic England then raised concerns about the cumulative impact and extent of urbanisation along the A127 corridor.

The interim sustainability appraisal (interim SA) to the current draft Local Plan consultation made the point at 14.1.1 that however, Historic England did not suggest outright objection to growth in this area ("an adequate buffer between West Horndon and Dunton would be expected") and concerns from 2015 may now be somewhat allayed, given that a comprehensive Dunton Garden Suburb scheme is no longer being actively considered as an option. A Dunton Hills Garden Village scheme might well impact on the setting of Dunton Hills farmhouse (grade II listed), however.


Historic England would also make reference to the sustainability appraisal for Dunton Garden Suburb Consultation (as produced by LUC and dated November 2014). We refer to this below in our representations.

The deletion of West Hornton is a significant change to the assessment of impacts. The impact upon the setting of historic assets within the site and outside the site are matters that require further detail. The setting of a heritage asset is defined in the glossary of the National Planning Policy Framework and National Planning Policy Guidance confirms that this may therefore be more extensive than curtilage. Historic England previously drew attention to this as it will be a significant material consideration in the assessment of impacts upon these heritage assets.

The NPPG states that 'The extent and importance of setting is often expressed by reference to visual considerations. Although views of or from an asset will play an important part, the way in which we experience an asset in its setting is also influenced by other environmental factors such as noise, dust and vibration from other land uses in the vicinity, and by our understanding of the historic relationship between places. For example, buildings that are in close proximity but are not visible from each other may have a historic or aesthetic connection that amplifies the experience of the significance of each'. Reference is Paragraph: 013Reference ID: 18a-013-20140306 dated 6 03 2014.

The Dunton strategic allocation (site reference 200) has been the subject of previous comments by English Heritage in respect of the Dunton Garden Suburb consultation (February 2015). These comments still apply to the draft Local Plan. This preferred allocation includes heritage assets at Dunton Hills (grade II - a 17th century house), the Church of St Mary (grade II and rebuilt 1873) and Dunton Hall (grade II - an early 19th century house). Setting is also a material matter and this applies to Wayletts (a grade II timber framed farmhouse to the north-east), Barnards (a grade II timber house), to the Church of All Saints (grade II) and a monument in the churchyard (grade II) as well as the historic park and garden at Thorndon Hall (to the north-west), itself a grade II* landscape.

The detailed consideration of setting will be a matter of material importance and such considerations are a constituent part of Local Plan policy 9.5 'Listed Buildings' and policy 6.3 (g) when considering the impact upon the significance of the asset.

The sustainability appraisal for the 2015 Dunton Garden Suburb consultation identified the eastern part of the site as a 'historic environment zone' considered sensitive to change (paragraph 2.15 of this document). It reported that this site
' contains archaeological find areas and medieval sites or find-spots, as well as remnants of historic field patterns of possible Middle Saxon origin. There are two listed buildings in the area, Dunton Hall and Dunton Hills, with others nearby. To the north west of the area is the Registered Park and Garden of Thorndon Park with Old Thorndon Hall and Gardens Scheduled Monument. The major employment and residential development identified for the site could have a significant negative effect on the setting of these historic assets and on the listed buildings within and close to the site unless appropriate mitigation measures such as natural screening are incorporated into the detailed design and layout of the development. Additional road traffic travelling between the development and Brentwood on the A128 could have adverse
effects on the historic assets of Herongate and Ingrave villages on this route and on the centres of Brentwood and Shenfield'.

Paragraph at 2.16 concluded that
'there is potential for a significant negative impact on the heritage environment. This effect is judged to be uncertain as it may be possible to avoid or reduce the potential effects by sensitive layout and design of development'.

The interim sustainability appraisal for the Local Plan, at its page 84, accepts that 'A Dunton Hills Garden Village scheme might well impact on the setting of Dunton Hills farmhouse (grade II listed).'

Historic England therefore recommends that further investigation is required including characterisation work to inform the evidence base. This work will inform the historic environment evidence base consistent with paragraph 169 of the National Planning Policy Framework. Historic England has published guidance which deals with historic characterisation in local and neighbourhood plans. This document is 'Understanding Place - Character and context in local planning' (published 2011 - revised June 2012) and is available at https://content.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/understanding-place-character-context-local-planning/understanding-place-cclp.pdf/

Further guidance is available as
'Understanding Place - Historic Area Assessments: Principles and Practice' (June 2010) and is available at https://content.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/understanding-place-principles-practice/understanding-place-haa.pdf/

The interim sustainability appraisal for the current draft Local Plan consultation states that when considering site options appraisal that
Limited data is available to inform the appraisal. Whilst there is good potential to highlight where development in proximity to a heritage asset might impact negatively on that asset, or its setting, a limitation relates to the fact that it has not been possible to gather views from heritage specialists on sensitivity of assets / capacity to develop sites. This is a notable limitation as potential for development to conflict with the setting of historic assets / local historic character can only really be considered on a case-by-case basis rather than through a distance based criteria. It will also sometimes be the case that development can enhance heritage assets.
(interim SA at page 57).

Historic England would conclude that the need for characterisation work will be fundamental to understanding the capacity of development in the Dunton Hills Garden Suburb.

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13683

Received: 23/03/2016

Respondent: Mr Sasha Millwood

Representation Summary:

Re Dunton: is in the green belt, therefore should not be developed at all.

Re Enterprise Park: not a brownfield site (see previous representations for more detail), so not suitable.

Re William Hunter Way: insufficient case for retail-led development; high-rise flats would be a more appropriate development here.

Re Baytree: has never had full occupancy, despite prime location, so there is no point creating other retail sites.

Full text:

Re Dunton: is in the green belt, therefore should not be developed at all.

Re Enterprise Park: not a brownfield site (see previous representations for more detail), so not suitable.

Re William Hunter Way: insufficient case for retail-led development; high-rise flats would be a more appropriate development here.

Re Baytree: has never had full occupancy, despite prime location, so there is no point creating other retail sites.

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13920

Received: 06/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Ian Blackburn

Representation Summary:

Without substantiation the wording of 6.29 is circular. A site should not be viewed as strategic just because it can become so with enough investment but because it has certain characteristics in its own right. Many location can be made to become strategic particularly with regard to a Housing led site. The evidence supporting a Strategic (large) housing allocation is not presented and furthermore there is no evidence to suggest that an investigation has been carried out to test whether the Dunton Hills Garden Village or any other location would be the best place to develop a strategic housing site.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14062

Received: 11/04/2016

Respondent: J M Gillingham

Representation Summary:

Without substantiation the wording of 6.29 is circular. A site should not be viewed as strategic just because it can become so with enough investment but because it has certain characteristics in its own right. Many location can be made to become strategic particularly with regard to a Housing led site. The evidence supporting a Strategic (large) housing allocation is not presented and furthermore there is no evidence to suggest that an investigation has been carried out to test whether the Dunton Hills Garden Village or any other location would be the best place to develop a strategic housing site.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14245

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Thurrock Council has a fundamental objection to a strategic Green Belt release at Dunton Hill Garden Village or at West Horndon due to the impact on the Green Belt.

Full text:

See attached and summary below:
Summary
It is considered that Brentwood Council has not thoroughly tested all the available options to accommodate the housing requirement within Brentwood. The National Planning Policy Guidance and earlier advice from the Planning Advisory Service recommend that local authorities should be required to thoroughly test all reasonable options before requiring other authorities to accommodate some of their need.
Thurrock Council at this stage does not consider that all reasonable options to accommodate Brentwood's dwelling requirement within Brentwood have been fully examined by the Council and tested in accordance with government policy and guidance. Therefore the approach to preparation of the local plan is unsound.
Thurrock Council requests that more detail is provided as to how such Green Belt release is to be undertaken and how alternative locations have been considered before a further draft Local Plan consultation. It is considered the role and development of the A12 corridor and in particular Brentwood/Shenfield Broad Area should be thoroughly investigated and its potential role to accommodate further growth over the period of the local plan and beyond. The implications of the potential to accommodate more growth and associated infrastructure requirements need to be considered with some weight as a way of meeting the housing requirement currently identified in the Brentwood Local Plan Growth Options and supporting evidence.
Thurrock Council has a fundamental objection to a strategic Green Belt release at Dunton Hill Garden Village or at West Horndon due to the impact on the Green Belt. In addition limited new or updated evidence has been made available to demonstrate the deliverability and viability of such schemes.
Thurrock Council has also highlighted various aspects of concern with the evidence base in connection with the preparation of the draft local Plan.
Thurrock Council wished to clarify that its objections to the earlier consultations to the Brentwood Local Plan and Dunton Garden Suburb stage still stand. Due to the issues highlighted in this response and to the earlier documents there are several fundamental concerns to the strategy approach and detail development proposals it is considered that Brentwood Council needs to carefully consider how it proceeds with the preparation of the Local Plan and the timetable for its production.
Thurrock Council request to be kept informed of the preparation and publication of the Brentwood Local Plan and technical evidence base as part of the Duty to cooperate process.

Attachments:

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14246

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Thurrock Council has a fundamental objection to Dunton as little new or updated evidence has been made available to demonstrate the deliverability and viability of a strategic development such as this.

Full text:

See attached and summary below:
Summary
It is considered that Brentwood Council has not thoroughly tested all the available options to accommodate the housing requirement within Brentwood. The National Planning Policy Guidance and earlier advice from the Planning Advisory Service recommend that local authorities should be required to thoroughly test all reasonable options before requiring other authorities to accommodate some of their need.
Thurrock Council at this stage does not consider that all reasonable options to accommodate Brentwood's dwelling requirement within Brentwood have been fully examined by the Council and tested in accordance with government policy and guidance. Therefore the approach to preparation of the local plan is unsound.
Thurrock Council requests that more detail is provided as to how such Green Belt release is to be undertaken and how alternative locations have been considered before a further draft Local Plan consultation. It is considered the role and development of the A12 corridor and in particular Brentwood/Shenfield Broad Area should be thoroughly investigated and its potential role to accommodate further growth over the period of the local plan and beyond. The implications of the potential to accommodate more growth and associated infrastructure requirements need to be considered with some weight as a way of meeting the housing requirement currently identified in the Brentwood Local Plan Growth Options and supporting evidence.
Thurrock Council has a fundamental objection to a strategic Green Belt release at Dunton Hill Garden Village or at West Horndon due to the impact on the Green Belt. In addition limited new or updated evidence has been made available to demonstrate the deliverability and viability of such schemes.
Thurrock Council has also highlighted various aspects of concern with the evidence base in connection with the preparation of the draft local Plan.
Thurrock Council wished to clarify that its objections to the earlier consultations to the Brentwood Local Plan and Dunton Garden Suburb stage still stand. Due to the issues highlighted in this response and to the earlier documents there are several fundamental concerns to the strategy approach and detail development proposals it is considered that Brentwood Council needs to carefully consider how it proceeds with the preparation of the Local Plan and the timetable for its production.
Thurrock Council request to be kept informed of the preparation and publication of the Brentwood Local Plan and technical evidence base as part of the Duty to cooperate process.

Attachments:

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14330

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Thurrock Council is fundamentally opposed to any large scale Strategic Green Belt releases either at Dunton Hill Garden Village as put forward in the Brentwood Local Plan consultation or the previous option for the Dunton Garden Suburb. The assumption that the A127 has greater potential for growth is questioned. Thurrock Council highlights the key concerns in relation to the A127 Corridor strategic corridor below and in response to Policy 6.6 Strategic Sites:
*Significant impact and harm to the openness of the Green Belt;
*Coalescence of settlements;
*Detrimental impact on the Landscape;
*The lack of certainty regarding the deliverability of the development;
*Lack of detail on location and phasing of such a development;
*Lack of detail on the viability of such a proposal;
*Impact of the scale of development on adjoining housing markets and ability of
Thurrock to deliver its housing;
*Infrastructure delivery and funding;
*Impact on strategic highway network - A127, A128, A13;
*Impact on the local highway network including within Thurrock;
*Lack of transport modelling and mitigation measure;
*Impact of possible LTX crossing route on land and infrastructure capacity;
*Assumption and scoring in the SA/SEA.

Full text:

See attached and summary below:
Summary
It is considered that Brentwood Council has not thoroughly tested all the available options to accommodate the housing requirement within Brentwood. The National Planning Policy Guidance and earlier advice from the Planning Advisory Service recommend that local authorities should be required to thoroughly test all reasonable options before requiring other authorities to accommodate some of their need.
Thurrock Council at this stage does not consider that all reasonable options to accommodate Brentwood's dwelling requirement within Brentwood have been fully examined by the Council and tested in accordance with government policy and guidance. Therefore the approach to preparation of the local plan is unsound.
Thurrock Council requests that more detail is provided as to how such Green Belt release is to be undertaken and how alternative locations have been considered before a further draft Local Plan consultation. It is considered the role and development of the A12 corridor and in particular Brentwood/Shenfield Broad Area should be thoroughly investigated and its potential role to accommodate further growth over the period of the local plan and beyond. The implications of the potential to accommodate more growth and associated infrastructure requirements need to be considered with some weight as a way of meeting the housing requirement currently identified in the Brentwood Local Plan Growth Options and supporting evidence.
Thurrock Council has a fundamental objection to a strategic Green Belt release at Dunton Hill Garden Village or at West Horndon due to the impact on the Green Belt. In addition limited new or updated evidence has been made available to demonstrate the deliverability and viability of such schemes.
Thurrock Council has also highlighted various aspects of concern with the evidence base in connection with the preparation of the draft local Plan.
Thurrock Council wished to clarify that its objections to the earlier consultations to the Brentwood Local Plan and Dunton Garden Suburb stage still stand. Due to the issues highlighted in this response and to the earlier documents there are several fundamental concerns to the strategy approach and detail development proposals it is considered that Brentwood Council needs to carefully consider how it proceeds with the preparation of the Local Plan and the timetable for its production.
Thurrock Council request to be kept informed of the preparation and publication of the Brentwood Local Plan and technical evidence base as part of the Duty to cooperate process.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15157

Received: 28/04/2016

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Limited

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Support the allocation of the strategic housing led site at Dunton Hills. Evidence prepared so far on behalf of the Council and the Promoters demonstrates that the site offers the most appropriate option for a large scale strategic development.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15672

Received: 10/05/2016

Respondent: Anglian Water

Representation Summary:

Anglian Water has made an initial assessment of the impact of the proposed housing, employment retail and leisure allocation sites on existing water and water recycling infrastructure located within Anglian Water's area of responsibility. This will need to be revisited when planning applications are submitted to the District Council and we are approached by developers as part of the planning application process. A copy of the initial assessment made by Anglian Water is included with this consultation response.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15695

Received: 10/05/2016

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Brentwood Enterprise Park as a strategic site within Policy 6.6 is strongly supported which recognises the critical importance of the sites to delivering the Plan's overall objectives.

Strategic employment would be focused on the part of the site to the south of the A127. This provides the greatest opportunity for new employment development to meet strategic needs.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15716

Received: 11/05/2016

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Dunton Hills Garden Village - we note that the Council wishes to establish green links from this new development to the rest of Brentwood Borough. We request therefore that these green links are accessible to all - pedestrians, cyclists and equestrians - rather than just pedestrians and cyclists.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15718

Received: 11/05/2016

Respondent: British Horse Society

Representation Summary:

Brentwood Enterprise Park (Policies 101A and 101B) - we note the proposal to regularise and expand the employment-led development at the junction of the M25/A127 and request that this park is planned appropriately so that the existing bridleway network in this vicinity is protected; the current enforcement issues with regard to the bridleways in this area are regularised, and a safe crossing of both the M25 and A127 is provided as part of this development, linking the bridleway networks either side of the M25.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15863

Received: 11/05/2016

Respondent: Sammi Developments Ltd

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Reliance on the housing-led strategic site of Dunton Hills Garden Village in the Plan period should be reduced.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15899

Received: 11/05/2016

Respondent: Essex County Council

Representation Summary:

ECC acknowledges BBC's ambition to fully meet its `objectively assessed need'.
ECC agrees that the Local Plan will be critical for making sure Brentwood has the right infrastructure, at the right time, to accommodate the new jobs and homes needed in the future. ECC considers that large scale housing developments will need to include appropriate infrastructure such as schools, community facilities and improvements to the roads. Small scale development should also fund improvements to existing services and facilities. ECC note that infrastructure provision is likely to have a major impact on the phasing and deliverability of development.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 15968

Received: 13/05/2016

Respondent: St Modwen Properties PLC

Number of people: 2

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

The identification of the Brentwood Enterprise Park as a strategic site is strongly supported which recognises the critical importance of the sites to delivering the Plan's overall objectives.

The inclusion of an individual policy within the plan for each of the sites is supported
and will assist with providing further certainty as to delivery and clarification when bringing forward outline or detailed planning applications on the site.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 16030

Received: 13/05/2016

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Reliance on the housing-led strategic site of Dunton Hills Garden Village in the Plan period should be reduced.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 16107

Received: 16/05/2016

Respondent: EA Strategic Land LLP

Agent: Iceni Projects Limited

Representation Summary:

This policy is fundamentally unsound given the lack of evidence underpinning the Council's decision to allocate the site for development. The policy is not positively prepared in that the Council has not properly considered the infrastructure requirements to facilitate a development on this scale, nor is the policy justified due to a lack of credible and robust evidence base e.g. Green Belt Review, Landscape Assessment ad Infrastructure Delivery Strategy. We consider any development on this site will not be deliverable within the plan period and therefore cannot be considered effective and finally the allocation does not constitute sustainable development.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments: