See attached.

See attached.

Q1: Yes.

Q2: No. Traffic on A127 at capacity (during rush hour extremely busy). There is not much room for expansion on A127, but the A12 could provide more room for widening. The flooding issue is a priority for improvement.

Q3: Yes. Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane] - industrial sites seem to be the only appropriate areas for development. The greenfield sites are not appropriate. We who live in this village (us for 46 years) want a village environment to remain.

Q4: Site 200 [Land East of A128, South of A127]

Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane]

Consider the clay soil re flooding.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites. Developing greenfield sites around West Horndon would be detrimental in so many ways.

Q7: Yes. Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses.

Q8: Yes. See comment above re buses [Rep ID 8495: "Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses."]

Q9: Yes. Improvement on recreational field/park in Cadogan Avenue. If the school needs enlargement there is scope in the small area adjacent to the school behind the houses in Cadogan Avenue and Thorndon Avenue.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4
Other - Sense of community: 4

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. The infrastructure, i.e. roads, school capacity, extra stopping trains, more doctors surgeries, to mention a few, needs to be completed or started and though about first before anything else.

Q13: All community facilities should be prioritised. This is an all or nothing situation. Will this have an impact on Council Tax?

Q1: No - Blackmore will lose its identity as a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes - Necessary to retain the Green Belt and farm land.

Q5: No.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: Yes.

Q13: No further infrastructure. Narrow road could not cope with extra traffic. Plus limited transport. None on Sundays. Extra cars on road. With 130 homes = approx 400 people possibly 260 more cars. We moved here from Central London to enjoy village atmosphere in retirement.

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. Blackmore is not suitable for any development with the facilities that are already here, school etc. The A127 Corridor has far more potential.

Q4: A127 Corridor, Dunton Garden Suburb would seem to be the best option.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: As far as villages are concerned, no greenfield sites should be developed only brownfield.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. Protect the High Streets.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: Yes.

Q13: State of footpaths in Blackmore are an absolute disgrace.

Q1: Not within the Green Belt.

Q6: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Q1: No. No building on Green Belt. I want to live in a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are local.

Q4: No capacity for growth on A127.

Q5: Yes. Not on Green Belt.

Q6: Far in excess of local need.

Q7: No. Not enough adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on current Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are for local need.

Q4: The A127 has no capacity for growth.

Q5: Yes, as long as it is not on Green Belt. I object to building on Green Belt.

Q6: This is not for local need, this is national need.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: No.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on what is currently Green Belt - I chose to live in a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites are appropriate providing they are for local need.

Q4: There is no capacity for growth on A127. It's always rammed with congestion.

Q5: Yes. Providing it's not on Green Belt.

Q6: This is far in excess of requirements for local need.

Q7: No. You do not have adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

See attached.

See attached.

Q1: No. Build on Brown Belt sites. I object to building on our Green Belt land.

Q2: No. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q3: Yes. You will destroy our village life. This is Green Belt land - not building land.

Q4: The A127 is already passed capacity and cannot except anymore.

Q5: Yes, providing it is not on Green Belt land.

Q6: We do not need anymore properties in our villages.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Why go for the easy option - Green Belt - our villages and home.

Q13: Herongate and Ingrave do not need any new infrastructure.

See attached.

Q1: No. I strongly object to any proposal to build on Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is ok to build on old factory sites if this is necessary and they are derelict. There is no need to build on Green Belt. Green Belt is Green Belt.

Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127. Building more houses will create even more gridlock.

Q5: No. The gridlock will still be there. Do you not research surrounding areas / traffic?

Q6: 80% of growth according to Brentwood Council will be from people who currently live outside Brentwood. There is no local need for this ridiculous amount of houses.

Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of employment and there is plenty of infrastructure existing for expansion.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.

Q13: Maintaining existing infrastructure and improving public access to Green Belt.

See attached.

Q1: Yes - Mainly.

Q2: Yes - We feel traffic congestion is getting worse and that new housing should be built within easy access of public transport.

Q3: We do not think it appropriate to build more houses in small rural villages like Blackmore because it will increase road congestion.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb would be the ideal location because of all the amenities that will be built within it.

Q5: No - This will only increase traffic on an already congested road unless money is available to widen the road.

Q6: No - People choose to live in our beautiful small villages because of the rural lifestyle and extra housing would ruin this and increase traffic on our narrow country lanes. Brownfield sites within Green Belt would be considered but only as a last resort.

Q7: No - The best approach would be to allocate new sites close to public transport as our roads are already too congested.

Q8: Yes - More retail shops in Brentwood High Street rather than bars and eating places.

Q9: No - Our village has good open space recreational facilities.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community spirit: 5

Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Fast traffic through village: 3

Q12: Improved public transport to enable easier commuting.

Q13: Road network improvement and repairs.

Q1: Yes - There are three areas north, centre, south.

Q2: No - South A127 corridor over used, C2C trains packed rush hour. Building on Green Belt that has historic flooding poor idea. No development of Shenfield area making use of Crossrail.

Q3: Yes - Development on brownfield site at West Horndon only. This alone will have major effect on village (infrastructure issues). No development on Green Belt, historic flood risk not fully appreciated.

Q4: I don't agree A127 has greater growth capacity, (other borough developments not considered in A127 capacity). Dunton Garden makes more sense than rest of proposals.

Q5: Yes - Park and ride to Crossrail hub has great potential.

Q6: Brownfield sites should be used first, i.e. Wash Road. Near Crossrail major hub. M25 Industrial site poor choice, road use only. No public transport.

Q7: Yes - Public transport must be accessible. Road use alone (poor idea).

Q8: Yes - Public transport to centre a must. A busy High Street a must for local and visitors to borough.

Q9: Yes - West Horndon Park could be better developed.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 2
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes - Over developed in south, West Horndon should not be doubled or trebled in size (Education, health, transport, flood risk not fully assessed!)

Q13: Public transport. Over reliant on roads.

Q1: Yes - The 3 different areas make sense.

Q2: No - Why does the A127 corridor have more potential than A12? The A127 is already at capacity in rush hour. We value our open space because we are nearer. The outer London boroughs and Green Belt is very important to us.

Q3: Yes - The brownfield site at West Horndon (the industrial estate) (A20-A21) which has a proposal for 500 would practically double the size of our village and this without any Green Belt development would alter the character of West Horndon. Flood risk must be taken seriously.

Q4: I do not agree with the statement, the A127 has a greater capacity than A12. Therefore feel that the only development around West Horndon should be the industrial estate (A20-21). Surely great development could occur in connection with new Crossrail line.

Q5: Yes - A12 corridor has the ability to meet a significant portion of Borough's increased housing need. As does Crossrail corridor.

Q6: Brownfield sites should always be first choice for building needs. Green Belt land particularly south of the borough where we are enclosed between Upminster and Basildon is greatly valued both as open space and flood relief.

Q7: It has been suggested that the present industrial site in West Horndon be relocated to the junction of A127 and M25. This seems an excellent idea provided that transport links be established from West Horndon Station, for workforce who presently come by train.

Q8: Yes - But we do need better transports into the town centre particularly later in evening it isn't any good having late opening in Brentwood if we can't get back.

Q9: It would be good to have a sports centre on the land adjacent to the Industrial estate.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Education - West Horndon School is a village school. New schools would be needed to cope with any significant growth. The same would apply to health care difficult to get doctors appointment at present.

Q13: Infrastructure needs to be in place prior to any development.

Q1: Yes - However, we cannot understand why so much development has been mooted in the villages around the Borough. The resources in these semi rural areas like: school places, access to doctors surgery appointments and poor local public transport etc. do not seem to have been included in your draft. Will the Council be increasing spending on village infrastructure to take into account this massive influx of people into a small community?

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes - Regarding site 143 Limes Grove/ Peartree Lane/ Peartree Close. There has been a draft application (?) entitled "Objection to Policy S2" circulated to local residents, some of this document is misleading, this plot is painted as a brownfield site with "run down, unused piggeries" - there have been sheep and goats in these buildings/ fields for numerous years.

This is currently Green Belt land. The building of the proposed 50 new houses would be totally out of scale with all other developments in Doddinghurst and would dramatically change the environment for the current residents in this area of the village.

Lime Grove is at present a small, no-through road which is only 4.8m wide, serving 100 homes. There is extensive on-street parking of residents vehicles which has increased markedly in the 20 years we have lived here. On road parking is heavy during "out of office" hours and especially weekends. The road is very congested with parked cars and access down the road for any delivery vans/lorries or emergency vehicles is very restricted. The waste collection lorry on Wednesday has to regularly drive up the kerbs onto the pavement to pass parked cars (damaging the verges and kerbs in the process), any additional traffic from the proposed development would only exacerbate this problem. The other access to the proposed site, Peartree Lane is little different.

Also site access for heavy vehicles during any construction phase would be dangerous to the residents of Lime Grove and Peartree Lane and access would be virtually impossible.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Brownfield sites should always be considered in advance of breaking ground on any Greenfield site. There are numerous brownfield sites, especially old trading estates, around our borough that could be recycled into housing areas.

Q7: Yes - And also close to the rail and bus network, shouldn't the council be encouraging public transport use rather than more cars on the already congested highway network?

Q8: Yes - However "superstores" should be sited away from the town centres to preserve the smaller traders.

Q9: Yes.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community Life: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No.

Q13: Brentwood Town centre redevelopment - Hunters Way, cinema/entertainment complex, additional car parking.