Question 13
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12818
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Wood
Regardless of your new proposals, people are pouring into the area. Surely new schools and medical buildings are needed.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12852
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers
Don't know.
Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.
Q4: Not sure.
Q5: No.
Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4
Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.
Q13: Don't know.
These questions are very biased and vague.
I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12868
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes
For all sites developed, appropriate infrastructure upgrading must be done.
New railway lines are unecessary, but Crossrail will expand Brentwood and Shenfield capacity - and a new, upgraded railway station will be needed on the Southend rail line through West Horndon.
Highway networks of A12 and A127 will need improvement as well as new interchanges for expanded housing.
Local roads onto these highways and through existing urban areas will need careful planning to provide capacity while minimising bottlenecks and congestion - ideally with traffic encouraged to flow and merge (German style) rather than to queue and wait at unnecessary stops.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12885
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd
Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.
Q1: No
Q2: No
Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.
Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.
Q5: No.
Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.
Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12910
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban
Given the scale of development proposed within the A127 Corridor, whilst there will be priorities the development will require infrastructure spending across all categories (education, healthcare, transport, green space and community facilities etc.) and is of paramount importance, failure to provide any one element of infrastructure will have a materially negative impact on both the existing residents and new development. As such, whilst there may be priorities in areas where development is expected to be lower/less significant, in areas expected to see high levels of development, a holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered to ensure development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12932
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price
Given the scale of development proposed within the A127 Corridor, whilst there will be priorities the development will require infrastructure spending across all categories (education, healthcare, transport, green space and community facilities etc.) and is of paramount importance, failure to provide any one element of infrastructure will have a materially negative impact on both the existing residents and new development. As such, whilst there may be priorities in areas where development is expected to be lower/less significant, in areas expected to see high levels of development, a holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered to ensure development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12945
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry
Cycling routes should be priority to contain the environmental impact crossrail will have on traffic congestion in the area, new schools with safe walk and cycle routes and green infrastructure developments for the enjoyment of all residents and prevention of crime due to "youth-boredom".
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12991
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Stratford
A127 & surrounding roads expansion & improvement, West Horndon station expansion & improvement & nearby additional station, local amenities (schools, GPs, shops) to the West Horndon/Dunton Hills new housing areas
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13023
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker
This question is ill-conceived. Appraisal required not an arbitrary consideration.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13036
Received: 08/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith
Roads to connect development and rail acess in the case of Dunton.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13040
Received: 14/02/2015
Respondent: Chris Wain
Question 13 Development south of A127 with upgraded rail and road would be positive benefit to the area
Question 12 Yes broadly, but the capacity of the A128 south of Brentwood would not cope with any major development
Question 13 Development south of A127 with upgraded rail and road would be positive benefit to the area
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13066
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Wooldridge
Surgery's and junior schools.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13078
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joan McCready
The previous answers deal with this.
No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
Q1: This entire exercise is pathetic when shipyards, coalmines and factories were closed down there was a need for an excercise such as this in those locations.
Q2: See my husbands answers.
2 yes by all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
3 One who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on an y individual site.
5, No - the previous answers deal with this.
6 No, no, no.
7. No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
10
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
11
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2
8 Yes - But no more supermarkets.
9 Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use ot for leisure.
4 None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
12 No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
13 The previous answers deal with this.
1.14 Consultations. For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace.While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.