Question 13
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7325
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Harrington
Making better roads, paths. More medical facililities.
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7341
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr George Hand
Doctor's surgeries, schools, upkeep and improvement of roads.
Please see attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7354
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lawrence Harrington
More for medical and educational facilities
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7373
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington
Making provision for better roads, more medical and educational facilities.
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7386
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter
Roads, Hospitals, GPs and Schools
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7402
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox
Roads
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7432
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
Transport, road congestion in villages, especially Herongate, Ingrave, West Horndon and Rayleigh Road. Access to schools, increased traffic due to large blocks of land being developed. GP practices over subscribed.
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7464
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Jennie Penkul
Road congestion, school overcrowding, access to healthcare, quality of life for existing residents
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7469
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
Given the scale of development proposed within the A127 Corridor, whilst there will be priorities, the development will require infrastructure spending across all categories (education, healthcare, transport, green space, community facilities etc.). Failure to
provide any one element of this infrastructure will have a materially negative impact on both existing residents, and the new development. As such, whilst there may be priorities in areas where development is expected to be lower/less significant, in areas expected to see high levels of development, a holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered to ensure the development is undertaken in a sustainable manner
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7471
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
The Parish Council urges the Borough Council to carry out a detailed study of West Horndon, focusing on infrastructure, housing needs, services, amenities, and public transport. Only after this has been carried out can the planning process claim to be properly informed.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7487
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr James Carpenter
Transport and in particular road quality improvement, also improved health care facilities available
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7502
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Beverley Graves
Roads, schools, hospitals
Schools now oversubscribed, roads struggle to cope
Basildon and Queens hospitals
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7515
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr David Phillips
Hospitals, schooling
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7533
Received: 18/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Mason
Good communication - roads, new station
Quality housing - affordable
Increased recreation facilities
Retail shopping
Public parks
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7547
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Stondon Massey Parish Council
Traffic calming, road maintenance
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7556
Received: 18/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Evelyn Vincent
Encourage more shops and parking in Ingatestone
Please see attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7571
Received: 18/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Robert Davis
The need to improve the roads
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7725
Received: 20/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Kathleen Richardson
Drainage issues (see issues about previous flooding)
Doctors surgery
Schools
Transport and road safety
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7738
Received: 23/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Glen Singleton
A holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered; any development needs to be
sustainable and should not overwhelm current services.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7764
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Atkinson
Given the scale of development proposed within the A127 Corridor, whilst there will be priorities, the development will require infrastructure spending across all categories (education, healthcare, transport, green space, community facilities etc). Failure to provide any one element of this infrastructure will have a materially negative impact on both existing residents, and the new development. As such, whilst there may be priorities in areas where development is expected to be lower/less significant, in areas expected to see high levels of development, a holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered to ensure the development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7779
Received: 14/02/2015
Respondent: Lisa Atkinson
Given the scale of development proposed within the A127 Corridor, whilst there will be priorities, the development will require infrastructure spending across all categories (education, healthcare, transport, green space, community facilities etc). Failure to provide any one element of this infrastructure will have a materially negative impact on both existing residents, and the new development. As such, whilst there may be priorities in areas where development is expected to be lower/less significant, in areas expected to see high levels of development, a holistic infrastructure plan needs to be delivered to ensure the development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7798
Received: 24/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Deborah Harper
Schools, public transport.
See Attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7810
Received: 24/03/2015
Respondent: Mr and Mrs June and Allan Rayner
Education, Health and Transport have equal top weight.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7833
Received: 24/03/2015
Respondent: Mr John Orbell
Roads, Drainage, Schools.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7855
Received: 24/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Nick Hart
A new station between West Horndon & Upminster, plus safer access to A127 from West Horndon, and a similar safe slip road at its future neighbour.
A127 corridor = the ONLY logical choice! A new village? :-)
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7879
Received: 24/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Culling
There is also a need for sheltered accommodation in the future.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7893
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Turner
Not known - it would depend on which areas are selected.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7906
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Alan Ormston
Easing traffic congestion around Shenfield Station and more car parking in the Borough in general.
Q1: In general I agree with the areas being considered.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: No.
Q4: In the light of the poor nature of the land and its good transport links A127, A13 and M25 together with rail stations at Laindon and West Horndon it would seem sensible to develop this area.
Q5: Pockets could be developed but not ribbon development.
Q6: Limited tasteful developments with buildings designed to enhance the character and individuality of each village.
Q7: Yes with proper adequate road connections and boundary soft landscaping.
Q8: Yes but not at all cost and the detriment of other areas.
Q9: No there are some excellent open spaces in the areas with additional walks through the countryside.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Other:- Close to all amenities: 4
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other:- Litter: 2
Q12: In light of the Crossrail changes at Shenfield Station proper plans need to be formulated for improvements both on and off station to cope with increased numbers of passengers which will be far greater than those disclosed by Crossrail over the next 12 years.
Q13: Easing traffic congestion around Shenfield Station and more car parking in the Borough in general.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7930
Received: 25/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs. S. Johnson
When every pothole is filled.
When every road and pavement is resurfaced,
When every street light is functioning then we can think about improving the A127 and A12.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7931
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Hart
As above [see representation ID 7929: "We need a new GP surgery in Brentwood regardless of any potential expansion. At the surgery I work at we are currently taking on new patients and the wait is two weeks before they can see any doctor, let alone their own."]
Potholes should be filled.
Q1: Yes. It's logical.
Q2: No. Green Belt land must be left alone. Brownfield sites (in Green Belt) are fine if they have already been built on. Any spare land on brownfield sites in Green Belt should be left alone.
Q3: Yes. Don't build on Green Belt land, even the land at the edges of urban areas. It's all precious.
Q4: It's up to the local residents. I don't feel qualified to comment.
Q5: No. Terrible idea. It's Green Belt so leave it alone. In 30 years time they'll be asking if they should build on Green Belt land on the new edges of unknown areas resulting from whatever building gets forced through this time. If every generation builds a little more there'll be no countryside left.
Q6: Greenfield sites on the edge of villages must be left as they are. Brownfield sites are the preference, as long as they don't allude to picturesque, formally operational farmland sneakily hidden behind a euphemism!
Q7: No. There's Green Belt land the around strategic highway network, so I'm sorry but in my view that's not an option no matter how it's put to us.
Q8: Yes. There's always empty shop units and we've got to see that cinema/shopping complex.
Q9: No. Not that I'm aware.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. We need a new GP surgery in Brentwood regardless of any potential expansion. At the surgery I work at we are currently taking on new patients and the wait is two weeks before they can see any doctor, let alone their own.
Q13: As above [see representation ID 7929: "We need a new GP surgery in Brentwood regardless of any potential expansion. At the surgery I work at we are currently taking on new patients and the wait is two weeks before they can see any doctor, let alone their own."]
Potholes should be filled.