Q1: Yes.

Q2: No. Traffic on A127 at capacity (during rush hour extremely busy). There is not much room for expansion on A127, but the A12 could provide more room for widening. The flooding issue is a priority for improvement.

Q3: Yes. Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane] - industrial sites seem to be the only appropriate areas for development. The greenfield sites are not appropriate. We who live in this village (us for 46 years) want a village environment to remain.

Q4: Site 200 [Land East of A128, South of A127]

Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane]

Consider the clay soil re flooding.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites. Developing greenfield sites around West Horndon would be detrimental in so many ways.

Q7: Yes. Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses.

Q8: Yes. See comment above re buses [Rep ID 8495: "Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses."]

Q9: Yes. Improvement on recreational field/park in Cadogan Avenue. If the school needs enlargement there is scope in the small area adjacent to the school behind the houses in Cadogan Avenue and Thorndon Avenue.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4
Other - Sense of community: 4

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. The infrastructure, i.e. roads, school capacity, extra stopping trains, more doctors surgeries, to mention a few, needs to be completed or started and though about first before anything else.

Q13: All community facilities should be prioritised. This is an all or nothing situation. Will this have an impact on Council Tax?

See attached

Q1: No - The Green Belt areas should be protected from any housing or commercial growth.

Q2: No - No comment.

Q3: Green Belt sites are never appropriate for housing developments or any other developments.

Q4: Green Belt sites shouldn't be put forward for growth. All Green Belt sites should be protected!

Q5: No - No comment.

Q6: Don't agree that there is a LOCAL need for 6000 houses on green or brownfield sites.

Q7: No - Don't consider that any future employment needs to be close to strategic highway networks.

Q8: Question is not applicable to providing large housing sites.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q1: No.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes - The use of Green Belt / agricultural land for building homes / commercial buildings is strongly opposed.

Q4: Not on Green Belt land.

Q5: No.

Q6: Brownfield sites only.

Q7: No - Not if on greenfield site.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 2
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: No.

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. Blackmore is not suitable for any development with the facilities that are already here, school etc. The A127 Corridor has far more potential.

Q4: A127 Corridor, Dunton Garden Suburb would seem to be the best option.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: As far as villages are concerned, no greenfield sites should be developed only brownfield.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. Protect the High Streets.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: Yes.

Q13: State of footpaths in Blackmore are an absolute disgrace.

Q1: No - Blackmore will lose its identity as a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes - Necessary to retain the Green Belt and farm land.

Q5: No.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: Yes.

Q13: No further infrastructure. Narrow road could not cope with extra traffic. Plus limited transport. None on Sundays. Extra cars on road. With 130 homes = approx 400 people possibly 260 more cars. We moved here from Central London to enjoy village atmosphere in retirement.

See attached.

Q1: No. No building on Green Belt. I want to live in a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are local.

Q4: No capacity for growth on A127.

Q5: Yes. Not on Green Belt.

Q6: Far in excess of local need.

Q7: No. Not enough adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on current Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are for local need.

Q4: The A127 has no capacity for growth.

Q5: Yes, as long as it is not on Green Belt. I object to building on Green Belt.

Q6: This is not for local need, this is national need.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: No.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

See attached.

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on what is currently Green Belt - I chose to live in a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites are appropriate providing they are for local need.

Q4: There is no capacity for growth on A127. It's always rammed with congestion.

Q5: Yes. Providing it's not on Green Belt.

Q6: This is far in excess of requirements for local need.

Q7: No. You do not have adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

See attached.

Q1: No. Build on Brown Belt sites. I object to building on our Green Belt land.

Q2: No. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q3: Yes. You will destroy our village life. This is Green Belt land - not building land.

Q4: The A127 is already passed capacity and cannot except anymore.

Q5: Yes, providing it is not on Green Belt land.

Q6: We do not need anymore properties in our villages.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Why go for the easy option - Green Belt - our villages and home.

Q13: Herongate and Ingrave do not need any new infrastructure.

See attached.

Q1: No. I strongly object to any proposal to build on Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is ok to build on old factory sites if this is necessary and they are derelict. There is no need to build on Green Belt. Green Belt is Green Belt.

Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127. Building more houses will create even more gridlock.

Q5: No. The gridlock will still be there. Do you not research surrounding areas / traffic?

Q6: 80% of growth according to Brentwood Council will be from people who currently live outside Brentwood. There is no local need for this ridiculous amount of houses.

Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of employment and there is plenty of infrastructure existing for expansion.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.

Q13: Maintaining existing infrastructure and improving public access to Green Belt.

See attached.

Q1: No. I object to any building on Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is ok to build old factory sites. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q4: A127 is very busy. More houses will create more gridlock.

Q5: No. Not if this means building on Green Belt.

Q6: Most of these houses what not be for people in Brentwood.

Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of work.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. Brentwood is a good place to live. Brentwood does not need more houses.

Q1: No - 078 Parklands High Street, Ingatestone. This area is Green Open Space and must be retained as an open space in our boundary to Margaretting.

Q2: No - 128 Ingatestone Garden Centre. This centre is used by the residents round the area and is essential as an amenity close by.

Q3: Yes.

Q5: No.

Q6: No.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Leisure/ Recreation: 3

Q1: Yes - Mainly.

Q2: Yes - We feel traffic congestion is getting worse and that new housing should be built within easy access of public transport.

Q3: We do not think it appropriate to build more houses in small rural villages like Blackmore because it will increase road congestion.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb would be the ideal location because of all the amenities that will be built within it.

Q5: No - This will only increase traffic on an already congested road unless money is available to widen the road.

Q6: No - People choose to live in our beautiful small villages because of the rural lifestyle and extra housing would ruin this and increase traffic on our narrow country lanes. Brownfield sites within Green Belt would be considered but only as a last resort.

Q7: No - The best approach would be to allocate new sites close to public transport as our roads are already too congested.

Q8: Yes - More retail shops in Brentwood High Street rather than bars and eating places.

Q9: No - Our village has good open space recreational facilities.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community spirit: 5

Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Fast traffic through village: 3

Q12: Improved public transport to enable easier commuting.

Q13: Road network improvement and repairs.