Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 8757

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Carol Hewitt

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on what is currently Green Belt - I chose to live in a village.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites are appropriate providing they are for local need.

Q4: There is no capacity for growth on A127. It's always rammed with congestion.

Q5: Yes. Providing it's not on Green Belt.

Q6: This is far in excess of requirements for local need.

Q7: No. You do not have adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

Attachments: