Question 9

Showing comments and forms 511 to 530 of 530

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12756

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Joanna Durrell

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

Q1: Do not build on green land.

Q2: No. Please let small villages remain part of English heritage and not overpopulate them.

Q3: Yes, leave the Green Belt alone. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q4: I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?

Q5: No. I don't want to live in a London Borough. I like that we are a small town and have a community feel.

Q6: No.

Q7: No.

Q8: Retail is a key part of our community. Not big supermarkets and department stores.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. The new port at Tilbury and the impact our village will have if the M25 and A130 fails to work. A128 will be used as a cut through to bypass the roads. Pollution and safety has not been addressed.

Q13: Ensuring our roads are safe and well maintained including pavements.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12770

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mr John Copps

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: No. This is mainly Green Belt plus fields. Please let there be some open spaces in Brentwood.

Q2: No. The infrastructure and facilities and local services are already stretched to the max.

Q3: No.

Q4: None. Find somewhere else.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Do not touch Green Belt.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: No.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Being a village which are slowly being lost in England: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No.

Q13: Making existing roads more roadworthy. Dealing with speed limits, especially on A128 which can be very dangerous. More buses and school buses to encourage more use.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12785

Received: 29/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Edna Connaway

Representation Summary:

No. Hutton is already a crowded community, but does have access to local countryside.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12802

Received: 30/04/2015

Respondent: John E Rolfe

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12815

Received: 30/04/2015

Respondent: Mr David Wood

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12848

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers

Representation Summary:

As in what provision? Don't know.

Full text:

Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.

Q4: Not sure.

Q5: No.

Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4

Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.

Q13: Don't know.


These questions are very biased and vague.

I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12864

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes

Representation Summary:

No - not without destroying recreational landscape, visual amenity and wildlife habitat, or without the need for greatly increased infrastructure and utilities (including road transport plus water & drainage).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12881

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: No

Q2: No

Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.

Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.

Q5: No.

Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.

Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12906

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban

Representation Summary:

Yes. West Horndon village currently benefits from a small community park on Cadogan Avenue. As part of any potential future development within the village (and indeed, the Dunton Garden Suburb), there are significant opportunities to enhance this park, both from a facilities and access perspective.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12928

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price

Representation Summary:

Yes. West Horndon village currently benefits from a small community park on Cadogan Avenue. As part of any potential future development within the village (and indeed, the Dunton Garden Suburb), there are significant opportunities to enhance this park, both from a facilities and access perspective.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12941

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry

Representation Summary:

Yes. Current open spaces are underdeveloped for leisure use such as playgrounds. If playgrounds are provided they are very small and often only suitable for tiny children. St Mary's playground is completely unsafe with uneven ground and sharp concrete corners sticking out under old rubber-ground. [Hutton].

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12953

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Ronan Hart

Representation Summary:

We are well served.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12971

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Anderson Group

Agent: Bidwells

Representation Summary:

Yes, within the proposed development area in the land south of Redrose Lane and east of Nine Ashes Road, Blackmore.

Full text:

See attached documents.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12978

Received: 06/05/2015

Respondent: D.J. Barbour-Bowne

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12979

Received: 06/05/2015

Respondent: P. Barbour-Bowne

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12987

Received: 07/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian Stratford

Representation Summary:

No. already lovely & rural, open, peaceful, lots of quiet country lanes for cycling/walking.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13019

Received: 07/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13032

Received: 08/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith

Representation Summary:

I am sure Blackmore has capacity for recreational facilities, but we are fairly well served by local walks playing fields etc.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13062

Received: 14/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Kenneth Wooldridge

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13075

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Joan McCready

Representation Summary:

Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developer.

Full text:

Q1: This entire exercise is pathetic when shipyards, coalmines and factories were closed down there was a need for an excercise such as this in those locations.

Q2: See my husbands answers.
2 yes by all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
3 One who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on an y individual site.
5, No - the previous answers deal with this.
6 No, no, no.
7. No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
10
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

11
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2

8 Yes - But no more supermarkets.
9 Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use ot for leisure.

4 None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
12 No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
13 The previous answers deal with this.
1.14 Consultations. For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace.While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.

Attachments: