See attached

Q1: No. The areas specified do not mention [sites] 028C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] plus sites on the edge of the Green Belt south of Hutton 028A/B [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood]. These are huge areas of land that are not part of the A12 and A127 Corridors, nor villages to the North of the Borough. This specific area is not considered, shown but not part of the planning.

Q2: No. North of the Borough - Insufficient attention to infrastructure - transport, schools, GPs.
A12 Corridor - Yes.
A127 Corridor - Yes.
No mention of [sites] 028A,B,C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] - Green Belt which should not be used for housing. Now much used by walkers, open space, historical woodlands, ample footpaths and good tracks. Home to much wildlife, birds, small mammals. Should not be touched as page 27 consultation document. Difficulty of ingress/egress to Hall Lane - no pavements and too much traffic on Hanging Hill Lane.

Q3: Yes. The A127 Corridor is the most suitable as it lies between the A127 and the railway. Not prime agricultural land, room for expansion between these two networks. Already a core of infrastructure which could be added to.
A12 Corridor - Yes if confined to areas between A12 and railway.
North of the Borough - Only if small sites were made available.

Q4: The A127 Corridor.

Q5: No. But only if between A12 and railway.

Q6: To develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. In order for Brentwood to remain a town it needs a town centre. Out of town shopping areas are losing their attraction and they are accessible nearby - Gallows Corner and Chelmsford.

Q9: No. With all the Green Belt around us at [sites] 028A,B,C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] we delight in the open spaces available to us.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Accessibility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: Yes. Growth of present population - schools expansion.

Q13: Transport. GP facilities. Education - schools.

see attached

Q1: Yes. A12 and A127 Corridors should be encouraged and not North due to lack of infrastructure.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. Blackmore is in a conservation area and within the Green Belt. Sites 076, 077, 199, 202 and 203. So are not suitable.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: In borough villages, if land needs to be released at all, then brownfield sites should be used.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. Reduce traffic by promoting town centres.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Tourist Attraction: 2

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Historic Buildings including Church & Priory: 2

Q12: No.

Q13: Health provisions.

see attached.

see attached

see attached

see attached.

see attached

see attached

I'm sending you a copy of the policy questionnaire; I'm not a local resident (not since 1974) but I am concerned about a part of your policy regarding development. I am a supporter of Hopefield Animal Sanctuary and am very concerned that Tesco will sell the land for development. I understand they have asked whether the council can purchase the land but unless the area is classified as leisure there is no way anyone can afford it. Please could you consider making this decision in favour of Hopefield and class the area for leisure. They do such a fantastic job caring for abandoned and rescued animals but I know you are aware of this! It would be heartbreaking to have to have these wonderful animals destroyed as there is nowhere for them to go. On behalf of my adopted boys George and Noah the donkeys, Sweet little Blossom, my grand-daughter's adopted pony and Hope my daughter's beautiful girl, Hope, the mare, please keep Hopefield for leisure.

Q1: I do not live in Brentwood so have only concerns for one area which is the possible development of The Hopefield Animal Sanctuary alongside the A12.

Q3: I feel the site alongside the A12 which is Hopefield Animal Sanctuary
should be kept for Leisure purposes only. It's a wonderful place - a huge
asset to Brentwood. Unless they are given a new site, or the council can
buy it from Tesco (at Leisure prices, not housing) all the animals will
probably have to be put down. We sponsor 2 donkeys and 2 horses there
and it's a lovely place to go to relax and enjoy the animals - definitely a
place of leisure! Please do not allow the area to be considered for
development but class it for leisure use only. Nearly 400 animals lives are
in your hands. Thank you.

Q5: No, definitely not if it is the Animal Sanctuary site.

Q9: Keep the one of the ones you have for leisure - Hopefield Animal Sanctuary.

Q10:
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

See attached.

Q1: No. I question very strongly the need for growth anywhere in Brentwood. The area is already overcrowded, services etc are struggling to cope.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is never appropriate to sacrifice Green Belt and areas of beauty to commercial or living purposes. In this overcrowded world these areas are even more precious.

Q4: This road is already much too busy and dangerous.

Q6: Brownfield sites.

Q7: The highway network needs to be hugely updated and enlarged first.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Water, sewerage. Lighting (safety). Schools. All healthcare facilities. Sport and leisure facilities.

Q1: No. Brentwood is too busy and overcrowded already.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. To have Green Belt is precious to keep.

Q4: This road is used too much already and dangerous.

Q5: No. Growth in Brentwood now is overcrowded and services are finding it hard to cope.

Q6: Brownfield.

Q7: The roads need to enlarge.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Lighting. Healthcare. Schools.

see attached

see attached

See attached.

see attached

see attached

see attached

Q1: Do not build on green land.

Q2: No. Please let small villages remain part of English heritage and not overpopulate them.

Q3: Yes, leave the Green Belt alone. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q4: I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?

Q5: No. I don't want to live in a London Borough. I like that we are a small town and have a community feel.

Q6: No.

Q7: No.

Q8: Retail is a key part of our community. Not big supermarkets and department stores.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. The new port at Tilbury and the impact our village will have if the M25 and A130 fails to work. A128 will be used as a cut through to bypass the roads. Pollution and safety has not been addressed.

Q13: Ensuring our roads are safe and well maintained including pavements.

Q1: No. This is mainly Green Belt plus fields. Please let there be some open spaces in Brentwood.

Q2: No. The infrastructure and facilities and local services are already stretched to the max.

Q3: No.

Q4: None. Find somewhere else.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Do not touch Green Belt.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: No.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Being a village which are slowly being lost in England: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No.

Q13: Making existing roads more roadworthy. Dealing with speed limits, especially on A128 which can be very dangerous. More buses and school buses to encourage more use.