Question 10
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3428
Received: 07/01/2015
Respondent: Michael Moore
I am unable to open the box to rate these issues but if I could I'd rate each of the aspects issues as '' 5 ''
I am unable to open the box to rate these issues but if I could I'd rate each of the aspects issues as '' 5 ''
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3446
Received: 16/01/2015
Respondent: Mr. Michael R. M. Newman
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness - 4
Outdoor Recreation /Leisure Use - 4
Wildlife Interest - 2
Historical Interest - 1
Tranquility - 3
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness - 4
Outdoor Recreation /Leisure Use - 4
Wildlife Interest - 2
Historical Interest - 1
Tranquility - 3
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3462
Received: 20/01/2015
Respondent: Ben Winter
no green belt development
no green belt development
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3496
Received: 25/01/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ann Cardus
I wish these questions were more specific. Do you mean areas within 30 minutes walk, within the borough. Do you mean just the green areas or all space?
Attractiveness is a 5 for the green areas near where I live (5 mins walk away)
Leisure use of outdoor space within 10 mins walk of where I live is a 5
Wildlife interest within 10 minutes walk is a 4
Historical interest of green spaces within 10 minutes drive is a 5
Tranquility within 10 mins walk is a 5
I wish these questions were more specific. Do you mean areas within 30 minutes walk, within the borough. Do you mean just the green areas or all space?
Attractiveness is a 5 for the green areas near where I live (5 mins walk away)
Leisure use of outdoor space within 10 mins walk of where I live is a 5
Wildlife interest within 10 minutes walk is a 4
Historical interest of green spaces within 10 minutes drive is a 5
Tranquility within 10 mins walk is a 5
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3521
Received: 31/01/2015
Respondent: Mr P Jones
Landscape valued at 5.
Landscape valued at 5.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3545
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Shelley Field
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 4
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3558
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ann Field
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3571
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: Robin Penny
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Other- Land Maintenance: 1
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3607
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Christie Ward
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3641
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: - EW Hall
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3653
Received: 04/02/2015
Respondent: Diane McCarthy
Scenic Beauty - 5
Outdoor use - 4
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 4
Tranquility - 5
Scenic Beauty - 5
Outdoor use - 4
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 4
Tranquility - 5
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3669
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Chris Hossack
I would rate the wooded farmland south of Hutton, i.e. Ingrave farmland as High (4) and land to the North of Pilgrims Hatch, Doddinghurst and Navestock and High (4)
I would rate the wooded farmland south of Hutton, i.e. Ingrave farmland as High (4) and land to the North of Pilgrims Hatch, Doddinghurst and Navestock and High (4)
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3674
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Patricia Taylor
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other: Open/uncrowded space 5
Please see attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3689
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Austin
Number of people: 2
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3706
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Lighterness
Number of people: 2
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other: Fresh air 5
See attached consultation questionnaire.
Please refer to the attached letters relating to the proposals for development in the above mentioned area.
It is widely felt that any building developments on these existing Green spaces (regardless of actual planning definition) would have an adverse effect on all local residents, from the young to those retired.
The area is the first 'parcel' of countryside North of Brentwood and as such is the Gateway for all residents who wish to enjoy access to the paths and Bridleways that stretch out from this point.
The access to that 'Gateway' is currently along quiet, almost traffic free, lanes and is a safe passage for both young and old.
It is vital that the local community and Brentwood as a whole do not lose such a valuable and recreational asset.
Any development upon the sites, in the area, would involve road building and re-planning of the local highway, putting even greater pressure upon the already dangerous, Ongar Road/Coxtie Green road roundabout. It is probable that any such development will further endanger pedestrian access to the previously mentioned 'Gateway'.
No development should take place.
Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 176
This parcel of land referenced above, is the closest to the 'Gateway' reference point mentioned in the covering letter, any development here would destroy that change affect one experiences when leaving suburbia and entering the real countryside.
The land itself has a natural spring and most of the time is waterlogged. Great Crested Newts have been seen in its pool, bats frequent the area and other wildlife, badgers, squirrels, etc 'live' in the vicinity.
Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter.
The land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its cartilage buildings.
Area must remain Green Belt.
Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011C
SHLAA ref: G038
This parcel of land, reference above, was stated as Green Belt in an unsuccessful development application made in 2009/10. There has been no stated change in that status and the previous reasons for the rejection of the plan remain in place.
The land is habitat for bats, smaller species of deer and other wildlife, badgers, squirrels, and untold varieties of bird species including long tailed tits.
Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter.
Again the land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its curtilage buildings.
Area must remain Green Belt.
Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011B
SHLAA Ref: G038
This land is scrub land but is habitat for bats, badgers, squirrels and untold varieties of bird species including long tailed tits, protected species such as Great Crested newts are known to be in this area.
Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter. It is probable that this area would be sacrificed to any road improvements to support the other building plans. The land currently acts a natural sound barrier against traffic noise on the Ongar Road, especially the braking sounds emanating from the Coxtie Green / Ongar Road roundabout.
Again the land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its curtilage buildings.
Area must remain Green Belt.
Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011A
SHLAA ref: B025
In October 2013, many of the local residents objected to the proposed building of domestic property on the above site, nothing has changed in the interim concerning those objections.
We, like many locally are once again stating that this building proposal should not be considered.
Hullets/ Gents Farm area is Grade II Listed, together with its curtilage buildings which border the rear gardens of 10 to 20 Orchard Lane. The buildings cannot be demolished to gain access to the paddock, which is Green and not Brown belt land, as it would defile the meaning of the Listing.
Area must remain Green Belt.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3723
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Ede
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3750
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Smith
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 1
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 1
Wildlife Interest: 1
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 2
Other: Litter 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3802
Received: 07/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jean Laut
We live were we do because of its landscape
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 5
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 3
Tranquility - 5
We live were we do because of its landscape
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 5
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 3
Tranquility - 5
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3825
Received: 08/02/2015
Respondent: Maureen Donnelly
4 - we have a main road at the front and a farm at the back - so we have bad and good - more traffic on Chelmsford Rd would be a disaster for us.
4 - we have a main road at the front and a farm at the back - so we have bad and good - more traffic on Chelmsford Rd would be a disaster for us.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3836
Received: 08/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Carl Laut
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 4
Wildlife interest - 4
Historical interest - 3
Tranquility - 5
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 4
Wildlife interest - 4
Historical interest - 3
Tranquility - 5
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3849
Received: 08/02/2015
Respondent: Jeff Fair
Living in Kelvedon Hatch - I would rate all as High/Very High with the mix of access to public rights of way, more structured open spaces, the limited traffic on the A128 and the proximity of historic structures such as the Nuclear Bunker. Much depends on how nearby areas are developed, because without care some of the open spaces could be lost in a short term approach. It is important to ensure that current developed land is utilised fully prior to further encroachment on farmland.
Living in Kelvedon Hatch - I would rate all as High/Very High with the mix of access to public rights of way, more structured open spaces, the limited traffic on the A128 and the proximity of historic structures such as the Nuclear Bunker. Much depends on how nearby areas are developed, because without care some of the open spaces could be lost in a short term approach. It is important to ensure that current developed land is utilised fully prior to further encroachment on farmland.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3862
Received: 09/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Keith Thomson
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 4
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3877
Received: 09/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Enderby
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3900
Received: 09/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Jonathan Lock
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 4
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 3
Tranquillity - 5
Scenic beauty - 5
Outdoor recreation - 4
Wildlife interest - 5
Historical interest - 3
Tranquillity - 5
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3929
Received: 09/02/2015
Respondent: Ron Lennard
Open specs is value 5 in all questions
Open specs is value 5 in all questions
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3937
Received: 09/02/2015
Respondent: Mr. L Marchant
Scenic - 4. Outdoor - 3. Wildlife - 5. Historic - 3. Tranquility - 5. Community - 4. Nice place to live - 4.
Scenic - 4. Outdoor - 3. Wildlife - 5. Historic - 3. Tranquility - 5. Community - 4. Nice place to live - 4.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3996
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs W. Way
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use:
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest:
Tranquility: 5
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 4001
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Dr Philip Gibbs
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 5 Very High
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4 High
Wildlife Interest: 5 Very High
Historical Interest: 5 Very High
Tranquility: 5 Very High
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 5 Very High
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4 High
Wildlife Interest: 5 Very High
Historical Interest: 5 Very High
Tranquility: 5 Very High
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 4020
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: S. Mitchell
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 5 Very High
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4 High
Wildlife Interest: 5 Very High
Historical Interest: 5 Very High
Tranquility: 5 Very High
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 5 Very High
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4 High
Wildlife Interest: 5 Very High
Historical Interest: 5 Very High
Tranquility: 5 Very High
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 4073
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Massett
Not possible to indicate on the graphic so response in order
5
4
5
3
5
Not possible to indicate on the graphic so response in order
5
4
5
3
5