Question 4

Showing comments and forms 571 to 600 of 609

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12382

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris

Representation Summary:

-Question whether the A127 corridor has greater capacity than the A12 corridor.
-Site 200 is "preferred" to other sites in the A127 corridor
-If undertaken sensitively Dunton has potential to provide required housing, whilst creating self sufficient development with access to infrastructure fundings.
-Developing site 200 would allow development around west horndon to be limited.
-200 is preferred option, but appropriate buffer zone must be incorporated between dunton and west horndon.
-Developming land next to the village would destroy the village environment.
-Consultation fails to identify flood risk issues
-BBC must use duty to cooperate to prevent building south of west horndon in thurrock.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12394

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Powell

Representation Summary:

Either the south of the A12 corridor with better A127 access between Brentwood and the A127. This would have added benefits to ease traffic congestion around Ingrave and Warley. Or the A127 . West Horndon site.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12412

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

The land at West Horndon represents the preferred location for growth in the A127 corridor when considered against key sustainability issues and objectives. Land to the east of the settlement, in the control of Countryside Properties, has no overriding environmental, technical or landownership constraints and could be delivered within the first five years of the Plan.

There is a strong case for building on the least attractive and lowest amenity parts of the Green Belt at West Horndon to solve the problems of housing supply and affordability in the borough. This is supported by evidence submitted with this representation - Rummey Design. Lane east of West Horndon, Essex - Urban Design, Landscape and Green Belt Assessment; RPS. West Horndon, Essex - An Archaeological Desk. Based Assessment. October 2014; and Richard Graves Associates. West Horndon, Extended Phase I Survey. January 2015.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12414

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Support redevelopment of existing employment sites at West Horndon (020 & 021), provides an opportunity for housing growth close to the existing railway station and nearby local facilities. Brentwood Enterprise Park can provide new employment floorspace options for displaced businesses. This will help reduce Green Belt impacts and ensure best use of previously developed land in line with national policy. Location proximity to M25 best meets employment demands and avoid distribution traffic travelling through residential areas.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12423

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Luxon

Representation Summary:

Don't know what other sites have been proposed as haven't received any notification.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12449

Received: 18/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs. Harlow

Representation Summary:

This road is already much too busy and dangerous.

Full text:

Q1: No. I question very strongly the need for growth anywhere in Brentwood. The area is already overcrowded, services etc are struggling to cope.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is never appropriate to sacrifice Green Belt and areas of beauty to commercial or living purposes. In this overcrowded world these areas are even more precious.

Q4: This road is already much too busy and dangerous.

Q6: Brownfield sites.

Q7: The highway network needs to be hugely updated and enlarged first.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Water, sewerage. Lighting (safety). Schools. All healthcare facilities. Sport and leisure facilities.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12466

Received: 18/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Martin

Representation Summary:

This road is used too much already and dangerous.

Full text:

Q1: No. Brentwood is too busy and overcrowded already.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. To have Green Belt is precious to keep.

Q4: This road is used too much already and dangerous.

Q5: No. Growth in Brentwood now is overcrowded and services are finding it hard to cope.

Q6: Brownfield.

Q7: The roads need to enlarge.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Lighting. Healthcare. Schools.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12475

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Scott Cooper

Representation Summary:

This question is biased, you cannot rely on people's ideas, as it forces people to answer Dunton Garden Suburb to prevent the village being under the siege of development. I question whether A127 has a greater capacity than the A12 corridor.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12495

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr R Thomas

Representation Summary:

Seems like a very loaded question but the south of the county (A127 corridor)
would be the best location

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12523

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Louise Cooper

Representation Summary:

Question is biased. You are forcing people to choose Dunton as otherwise West Horndon village will be under siege of development. I question that the A127 corridor has greater capacity than the A12 corridor.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12535

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Lynne Matthews

Representation Summary:

Due to the possibility of more significant development, the West Horndon and Dunton Sites are clearly the best location for growth due to the larger expanse of land available which may not impact upon existing neighbours with a negative effect and the excellent transport links both for the developers and heavy plant plus the new residents.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12550

Received: 24/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Martin Sorrell

Representation Summary:

West Horndon

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12600

Received: 24/04/2015

Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd

Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited

Representation Summary:

The capacity for growth, while a relevant factor, should not be determinative of the location for growth alone. The Borough Council might wish to consider a more multi- dimensional assessment in order to form a complete analysis of potential locations for growth necessary to ensure that a sustainable form of development results in the Borough. Available land capacity is, on its own unrelated to the existing spatial pattern of development, residential population, provision of services, employment and facilities. On this basis there are better-suited sites in locations within and adjacent to the existing higher order centres such as Brentwood that can provide an appropriate mix and choice of sites for future growth.

Full text:

See attached questionnaire.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12648

Received: 27/04/2015

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Redevelopment of existing employment sites at West Horndon is suggested (020 & 021) to provide an opportunity for housing growth. New employment provision at The Range North can provide contribution towards providing alternative provision for jobs or businesses displaced. It is also considered that the plan should seek to continue to make best use of available sites that do not harm the wider landscape or green belt such as The Range North (112D).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12649

Received: 27/04/2015

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Employment development at The Range North (112B) would also be well located in proximity to M25 to assist meeting employment and occupier demands as well as help overcome highway capacity issues and avoid issues with distribution traffic and HGVs travelling through residential areas as referred to in the AA.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12672

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: The Croll Group

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Land east of Horndon Industrial Park and the village of West Horndon is considered a suitable location for growth given its siting along the A127 and that it is served by a mainline railway line at West Horndon Station. This makes the village highly sustainable and therefore development here would be in line with the NPP

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12715

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

Representation Summary:

The extension to [West] Horndon provides a good opportunity to use Previously Developed Land in an area, well served by rail and the strategic road network. Both large strategic sites in the A127 corridor will undoubtedly require some infrastructure improvements and given the potential size of these sites it is unlikely that houses would be delivered within the first 5 years of the plan. The Council could seek to help improve delivery of these sites by engaging in discussions with Developers early or ensure that elements such as Design Codes are not required which could ultimately delay the start on site by months or even years.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12716

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

Representation Summary:

It is felt that the Dunton extension may require more infrastructure improvements than that at West Horndon given the quantum of development currently being discussed between the Brentwood and Basildon Authority areas. If Dunton were to be allocated it is likely delivery will be seen in the Basildon Authority first with the latter phases within the Brentwood boundary. Given this likely phasing Brentwood should consider whether Dunton should be allocated in addition to West Horndon, albeit on the premise that the plan period, is extended past the minimum period of 15 years to ensure the delivery of these homes is well planned.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12725

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: One Property Group Ltd

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Approach to locate 93% of new employment land in A127 Corridor is contrary to findings of the Issues and Options Consultation Preliminary Analysis (2010) where respondents expressed a clear preference for centralised growth, with development within and around the town of Brentwood.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12739

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Martin Grant Homes

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

We consider that Brentwood should consider all options available to them in order to deliver housing within their administrative boundary, including appropriate greenfield sites that abut the development edge of settlements.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12751

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Joanna Durrell

Representation Summary:

I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?

Full text:

Q1: Do not build on green land.

Q2: No. Please let small villages remain part of English heritage and not overpopulate them.

Q3: Yes, leave the Green Belt alone. Do not build on Green Belt.

Q4: I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?

Q5: No. I don't want to live in a London Borough. I like that we are a small town and have a community feel.

Q6: No.

Q7: No.

Q8: Retail is a key part of our community. Not big supermarkets and department stores.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes. The new port at Tilbury and the impact our village will have if the M25 and A130 fails to work. A128 will be used as a cut through to bypass the roads. Pollution and safety has not been addressed.

Q13: Ensuring our roads are safe and well maintained including pavements.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12765

Received: 24/02/2015

Respondent: Mr John Copps

Representation Summary:

None. Find somewhere else.

Full text:

Q1: No. This is mainly Green Belt plus fields. Please let there be some open spaces in Brentwood.

Q2: No. The infrastructure and facilities and local services are already stretched to the max.

Q3: No.

Q4: None. Find somewhere else.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Do not touch Green Belt.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: No.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Being a village which are slowly being lost in England: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: No.

Q13: Making existing roads more roadworthy. Dealing with speed limits, especially on A128 which can be very dangerous. More buses and school buses to encourage more use.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12780

Received: 29/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Edna Connaway

Representation Summary:

The area south of the A127, between West Horndon and Basildon (Dunton area) is the best location, but should not be a continuous area of housing. Green Belt must be protected and maintained.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12797

Received: 30/04/2015

Respondent: John E Rolfe

Representation Summary:

No development until the infrastructure is properly expanded and planned.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12810

Received: 30/04/2015

Respondent: Mr David Wood

Representation Summary:

West Horndon
Laindon
Basildon

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12843

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers

Representation Summary:

Not sure.

Full text:

Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.

Q4: Not sure.

Q5: No.

Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4

Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.

Q13: Don't know.


These questions are very biased and vague.

I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12859

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes

Representation Summary:

I agree that the A127 corridor not only offers greatest capacity for growth, but also makes use of existing transport infrastructure and has least negative impact on the landscape, environment and public amenity.
Furthermore it would create an all-new, purpose-built and optimised layout, rather than straining the resources and constraints of Brentwood town itself.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12876

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd

Representation Summary:

No because the site isn't located near the A127.

Full text:

Q1: No

Q2: No

Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.

Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.

Q5: No.

Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.

Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12900

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban

Representation Summary:

Question that there is greater capacity for the A127 as opposed to the A12. Dunton Garden Suburb, would create the least harm. If undertaken in a sensitive manner it can provide the required numbers for residential development that is sustainable and provides access to infrastructure funding. There would need to be an appropriate buffer zone on the western edge. Development of the land immediately adjacent to the village would destroy the current village environment. Development to the south of West Horndon in Thurrock must be prevented through Duty to Cooperate discussions. Such development would also cause harm similar to that identified for sites 037, 038 and 126.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12922

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price

Representation Summary:

Question that there is greater capacity for the A127 as opposed to the A12. Dunton Garden Suburb, would create the least harm. If undertaken in a sensitive manner it can provide the required numbers for residential development that is sustainable and provides access to infrastructure funding. There would need to be an appropriate buffer zone on the western edge. Development of the land immediately adjacent to the village would destroy the current village environment. Development to the south of West Horndon in Thurrock must be prevented through Duty to Cooperate discussions. Such development would also cause harm similar to that identified for sites 037, 038 and 126.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: