Question 4

Showing comments and forms 601 to 609 of 609

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12935

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry

Representation Summary:

Land along the A127 corridor is most suitable.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12965

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Hermes Fund Managers Limited

Agent: McGough Planning Consultants

Representation Summary:

Para 3.12 presupposes that it is one or the other i.e. West Horndon or Dunton Garden Suburb. This is not the case.

There are obvious difficulties associated with bringing forward the Dunton Garden Suburb (which is also greenbelt affected by flooding issues, but without the benefits of existing infrastructure) and the potential lengthy period of time before any beneficial development could come forward.

Redevelopment of the industrial estates in West Horndon would be in accordance with the broad thrust NPPF and is supported by local residents. It would be a false premise if the Council's approach was to show the option as an "all or nothing" choice to development of West Horndon.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12966

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Hermes Fund Managers Limited

Agent: McGough Planning Consultants

Representation Summary:

Hermes considers West Horndon is the best location for an appropriate quantity of growth. The village is an existing community, well served by road and rail infrastructure, with two large, and increasingly problematic industrial estates within the identified settlement boundary that could be beneficially redeveloped for residential led mixed use development.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12983

Received: 07/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian Stratford

Representation Summary:

As the A127 corridor can be expanded to cope with increased road traffic & increased rail traffic, including an additional rail station, disruption to the whole of Essex will be confined to a smaller area both during construction & once housing is completed & occupied, as long as local amenities to this area (schools, GPs, shops) are adequately provided for the increased population, so sites around West Horndon & Dunton Hills seem the best options. Dispersing development to multiple sites over a wider area would clearly result in more widespread disruption throughout Essex both during construction & once new housing occupied, which would seem a major disadvantage.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13013

Received: 07/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13027

Received: 08/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith

Representation Summary:

Certainly a lot more scope for growth an conectivity in Dunton area, so yes do agree Dunton is the best place to develop.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13037

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

The most appropriate strategy for Brentwood Borough is to focus strategic development through an urban extension to the east of West Horndon.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13057

Received: 14/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Kenneth Wooldridge

Representation Summary:

Only for respositionaing of above industrial estate [the two West Horndon industrial sites].

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 13076

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Joan McCready

Representation Summary:

None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.

Full text:

Q1: This entire exercise is pathetic when shipyards, coalmines and factories were closed down there was a need for an excercise such as this in those locations.

Q2: See my husbands answers.
2 yes by all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
3 One who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on an y individual site.
5, No - the previous answers deal with this.
6 No, no, no.
7. No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
10
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

11
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2

8 Yes - But no more supermarkets.
9 Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use ot for leisure.

4 None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
12 No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
13 The previous answers deal with this.
1.14 Consultations. For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace.While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.

Attachments: