5. Resilient Built Environment

(1)5.1 It is increasingly recognised that the design and layout of our built environment can impact our well-being and the opportunities to live a healthy lifestyle.

5.2 The role of planning policies and decisions in enabling and supporting healthy lifestyles is recognised in the NPPF (2018, paragraph 91).

5.3 The NPPF (2018, section 14) emphasises the need to take a proactive approach to mitigating and adapting to climate change. Our built environment is often put under strain during extreme weather conditions. The policies in this section seek to avoid increased vulnerability to extreme weather conditions, to ensure infrastructure is built to be resilient under conditions of a changing climate, and to ensure development is planned in ways that reduce carbon emissions, providing a positive strategy for resource efficiency. The Council seeks to improve our built environment so that it can support the future resilience of communities and infrastructure, as well as create strong, vibrant and healthy communities.

5.4 Infrastructure plays a critical role in enabling communities and businesses to survive and flourish in the face of climate and other threats. The concept of resilience in a planning context can be understood as the ability to reduce exposure to, prepare for, cope with, recover better from, adapt and transform as needed, to the direct and indirect consequences of climate change, where these consequences can be both short-term shocks and longer-term stresses^[1].

5.5 Resilience-building strategies can be considered to be 'reactive' or 'proactive'^[2]. A reactive approach focuses on mitigating consequences, maintaining stability and the status quo, whereas a proactive approach focuses on change and adaptation and looks more towards addressing long term stresses. Both approaches are incorporated in this Plan.

5.6 A holistic approach to sustainable development that reduces the environmental impact of development whilst healthy planning should be embedded within all development proposals from the outset.

5.7 The policies in this section aim to increase the efficiency and resilience of our infrastructure, making our borough smarter and better prepared for climate impacts and other threats.

Future Proofing

5.8 The term 'future-proofing' refers to the process of anticipating the future and developing methods of minimising the effects of shocks and stresses of future events. The concept is a critical component of resilience building strategy.

5.9 This policy requires applicants to consider:

1. reactive measures to minimise the potential of and prepare for short-term shocks (such as pests, diseases, fire, flood, heatwave, etc.); and
2. proactive strategies to adapt to long-term changes caused by climate change and technology development, through sustainable design, energy conservation, adaptable and flexible engineering, and other effective means.

5.10 Time horizons for future-proof interventions often depend on several variables but having a long-term vision and strategies, at least for the life of the development, can help plan ahead and defer the obsolescence and consequent need for demolition and replacement of structures, avoiding cost and service disruption.

5.11 Today, our social interactions, ways of doing business, travelling and other activities are supported and governed by digital connectivity. Not only is digital infrastructure an essential of today's economy but it is also critical in events of disturbance and is increasingly used to assist people with a range of health conditions. Space for digital infrastructure should be designed and installed as an integral part of development to minimise cost and disruption involved in the installing and retrofitting in line with Policy BE10 Connecting New Development to Digital Infrastructure.

5.12 Economic and business cycles, retail trends, among other market events, inevitably account for degree of uncertainty in the delivery and phasing of development, especially larger sites. This in turn, has consequent impacts on the built environment and the local housing market. Therefore, applicants should consider their impacts on delivery as far as it is appropriate and realistic to do so, and have appropriate measures and plans in place.

(1)Responding to Climate Change

(1)5.13 Climate change and its consequences including flooding, heatwave and drought are significant environmental challenges and mitigating them is key to sustainability. Globally, the average concentration of CO₂ now exceeds 400 parts per million, the highest in recorded history^[3]. Sixteen of the seventeen warmest years on record have occurred since 2001^[4]. The Environment Agency predicts an average sea level rise around the UK of at least a metre by 2115 from a 1990 baseline^[5].

5.14 The Climate Change Act (2008) legislates for an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions against 1990 levels by 2050. This requires everyone to be engaged, from national and local government to businesses, households and communities.

5.15 Building the resilience of wildlife, habitats and ecosystems to climate change, to put our natural environment in the strongest position to meet the challenges and changes ahead is one of the objectives of the National Adaptation Programme 2018^[6]based on key recommendations from the Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017^[7]. This is addressed further by a number of policies, such as Policy BE18 Green and Blue Infrastructure, Policy NE01 Protecting and Enhancing the Natural Environment, NE02 Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy (RAMS), Policy NE03 Trees, Woodlands, Hedgerows, NE05 Air Quality, and NE06 Flood Risk.

(2)5.16 The policies in this chapter require decision takers and developers to give an appropriate consideration to addressing the climate change, including:

1. climate change mitigation measures which focus on reducing the impacts of human activities on the climate system, by means such as:
   1. designing new communities and buildings to be energy and resource efficient;
   2. incorporating renewable technologies;
   3. reducing existing and potential source of pollution;
   4. reducing transport related carbon emissions through the promotion of sustainable modes of transport; and
2. climate change adaptation measures which focus on ensuring that new developments and the wider community are adaptable and resilient to the changing climate, by means such as:
   1. buildings, infrastructure and construction techniques that are designed to adapt to a changing climate and to avoid contributing to its impacts, including urban heat island effect;
   2. safe and secure environment which is resilient against the impacts of climate change long term stresses and extreme weather events;
   3. enhancing biodiversity and ecological resilience where possible;
3. efficient resource management measures that take into account issues such as,
   1. allocation and density of development;
   2. resource consumption (including water, energy, construction materials) during construction and operation as well as the environmental, social and economic impacts of the construction process itself and how buildings are designed and used.

Sustainable Construction and Resource Efficiency

5.17 Consideration of sustainable design and construction issues should take place at the earliest possible stage in the development process. This will provide the greatest opportunities for a well designed and constructed development and at the same time enable costs to be minimised. Therefore, developers should consider sustainable construction issues in pre-application discussions with the Local Planning Authority. Proposals should be captured within a Sustainability Statement, which can form part of the Design and Access Statement.

5.18 Sustainable design and construction are concerned with the implementation of sustainable development in individual sites and buildings. It takes account of the resources used in construction, and of the environmental, social and economic impacts of the construction process itself and how buildings are designed and used. Major development should also refer to Policy SP05 Construction Management.

5.19 The choice of sustainability measures and how they are implemented may vary substantially from development to development. However, the general principles of sustainable design and construction should be applied to all scales and types of development. More guidance on areas to be covered in the Sustainability Statement is set out in Figure 5.1.

Adaptation to climate change Adaptation measures can be implemented at a variety of scales, from individual buildings up to community and conurbation scale. Measures that will have benefits beyond site boundaries, and that will have a cumulative impact in areas where development is to be phased, should also be pursued. Applicants should refer to best practice guidance. Carbon reduction Proposals should demonstrate how the carbon reduction target will be met within the energy hierarchy, as illustrated in Figure 5.2, in particular how the proposals: minimises the energy demand of new buildings by means such as fabric first approach and design; utilises energy efficient supply through low carbon technologies; supplies energy from new, renewable energy sources; and where on-site provision of renewable technologies is not appropriate, confirmation of offsite arrangement should be submitted. Proposals for major development should contain a calculation of the energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions covered by Building Regulations and, separately, the energy demand and carbon dioxide emissions from any other part of the development, including plant or equipment, that are not covered by the Building Regulations (i.e. the unregulated emissions), at each stage of the energy hierarchy. Proposals should also explain how the site has been future-proofed to achieve zero-carbon on-site emissions by 2050. Water management Development must optimise the opportunities for efficient water use, reuse and recycling, including integrated water management and water conservation. Site waste management Developments should be designed in a way that reduces the amount of construction waste and maximises the reuse and recycling of materials at all stages of a development's lifecycle. All new development should be designed to make it easier for future occupants to maximise levels of recycling and reduce waste being sent to landfill. In order to do so, storage capacity for waste, both internal and external, should be an integral element of the design of new developments. The Council will be supportive of innovative approaches to waste management. Use of materials All new developments should be designed to maximise resource efficiency and identify, source, and use environmentally and socially responsible materials. There are four principal considerations that should influence the sourcing of materials: Responsible sourcing – sourcing materials from known legal and certified sources through the use of environmental management systems and chain of custody schemes including the sourcing of timber accredited by the Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC), or the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC); Secondary materials – reclaiming and reusing material arising from the demolition of existing buildings and preparation of sites for development, as well as materials from other post-consumer waste streams; Embodied impact of materials – the aim should be to maximise the specification of major building elements to achieve an area-weighted rating of A or B as defined in the Building Research Establishment (BRE) Green Guide to Specification. Consideration should also be given to locally sourced materials; and Healthy materials – where possible developers should specify materials that represent a lower risk to the health of both construction workers and occupants. For example, selecting materials with zero or low volatile organic compound (VOC) levels to provide a healthy environment for residents. Other As well as the consideration of the above issues, the sustainability statement in support of the application should also address how the proposals meet all other policies relating to sustainability throughout the plan, including: biodiversity and ecology; land, water, noise and air pollution; transport, mobility and access; health and well-being, including provision of open space; culture, heritage and the quality of built form, including efficient use of land.

Figure 5.1: Areas to be covered in the sustainability statement and recommended approach

Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Development

5.20 The NPPF (2018) requires the planning system to support the transition to a low carbon future in a changing climate, encourage the use of renewable and low carbon energy and associated infrastructure in line with the Climate Change Act 2008.

5.21 The Brentwood Renewable Energy Study (2014)^[8] states that around half of all energy used in the borough is from road transport, with a third from domestic use and about a fifth from the commercial and industrial sector.

5.22 Statistical information from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)^[9], indicates that Brentwood Borough has relatively high levels of domestic gas and electricity consumption. Over the period 2010 - 2015, Brentwood had the highest level of domestic customer mean gas consumption in the County and was also significantly higher than the England and East of England averages for the same period. Electricity usage for Brentwood ranks about 4^th in the County and also significantly higher than the England and East of England averages for the period 2010-2015. One of the reasons for the higher domestic energy use in Brentwood maybe that homes in the borough are 13% larger than homes in England on average.

5.23 Transport emission in the borough is also higher than the national average due to increased car ownership and access to vehicles. Over the period of the Plan, energy use and carbon emissions may increase by 10% following a 'business as usual' trajectory.

Carbon reduction target: challenging policy environment and long-term direction

5.24 The UK Carbon Plan (HM Government, 2011) states that if we are to achieve the 2050 carbon target, by 2050 the emissions footprint of our buildings will need to be almost zero. The UK's Committee on Climate Change in 2015 reinstates that 'meeting the 2050 target will require that emissions from energy use - power, heat and transport - are almost eliminated'^[10].

5.25 The UK Government scrapped the zero-carbon homes policy in summer 2015. Consequently, the UK's 2012 National Plan to meet the Directive will need a revision in light of the removal of the zero-carbon homes. Short-term policy on climate change since then suffers from uncertainty.

5.26 However, the Climate Change Act 2008 commits the UK Government by law to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% of 1990 levels by 2050. In addition, as long as the UK is a member of the EU, it still has to comply with the EU's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive^[11], which requires that by 2020 the demand from all new buildings in Member States is 'nearly zero-energy'. The Paris Agreement also has implications on the UK carbon reduction target^[12].

5.27 Therefore, the long-term trajectory retains: 'we will move away from the use of fossil fuels for heating and hot water and towards low carbon alternatives such as heat pumps or heating networks. By 2050, emissions from heating and powering our buildings will be virtually zero.'^[13]

5.28 In light of the challenging policy environment for energy planning and long-term direction, the Council takes a positive approach in supporting the transition towards a low carbon future and addressing the climate change. This is in line with the NPPF (2018, paragraph 148), which requires local planning authorities to 'contribute to radical reductions in greenhouse gas emissions'.

5.29 The government originally set targets to ensure all new homes are zero carbon by 2016 and all new non-residential buildings are zero carbon by 2019. Improvements in resource efficiency to meet this target was made through Building Regulations which set standards for design and construction that applies to most new buildings, regardless of type. In 2016, Part L of the Building Regulations introduced a change to the energy efficiency standard, raising it to the equivalent of Code for Sustainable Homes Level 4.

5.30 The Planning and Energy Act 2008 allows local authorities to set local targets for carbon emissions above Building Regulations. The Deregulation Act 2015 (S43) which removes this right has not been enacted, meaning authorities can continue to set policy above Building Regulations.

5.31 The achievement of national targets for the reduction of carbon emissions will require action across all sectors of energy use. High standard of construction in new development is important if the United Kingdom is to meet its legally binding carbon reduction targets.

5.32 To contribute to these targets, this policy requires an on-site reduction of at least 10 per cent beyond the baseline of part L of the current Building Regulations. The minimum improvement over the Target Emission Rate (TER) will be increased in 2020 and over a period of time in line with the national zero-carbon policy and reflect the costs of more efficient construction methods.

5.33 Regulation 25B 'Nearly zero-energy requirements for new buildings' of the Building Regulations will not come into force until 2019 at the earliest^[14] and statutory guidance on how to comply with Regulation 25B is not available at the time of this Local Plan being published. All developments are required to comply with this Regulation when it comes into force. If the national zero carbon policy is still unavailable after 2020, the 2016 - 2020 target applies; however, the minimum improvement over the Building Regulations baseline will be reviewed.

5.34 According to the Brentwood Renewable Energy Study (2014), an international analysis of certified buildings has shown that the additional cost of achieving BREEAM 'Very Good' is expected to be minor and so therefore should not be burdensome for developers. The version of BREEAM that a building must be assessed under should be the latest BREEAM scheme and not be based on scheme versions that have been registered under at the pre-planning stages of a project.

5.35 There are many approaches that can be taken to meeting the construction standards required by this policy. The Council will be supportive of innovative approaches to meeting and exceeding the standards set out in the policy. Where other construction standards are proposed for new developments, for example Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) or construction methods such as Passivhaus Standard, these will be supported, provided that it can be demonstrated that they are broadly in line with the standards set out above, particularly in relation to carbon reduction and water efficiency.

5.36 The Council expects all new development to apply the energy hierarchy, set out in Figure 5.2, by reducing the need for energy, supplying energy efficiently, and using low and zero carbon technologies.

Figure 5.2: Energy Hierarchy

Allowable Solution

5.37 As part of the government's policy for achieving zero carbon performance, the policy seeks to establish realistic limits for carbon compliance (on site carbon target for buildings) and allows for the full zero carbon standard to be achieved through the use of 'allowable solutions'. These are envisaged as mainly near site or off-site carbon saving projects which would compensate for carbon emissions reductions that are difficult to achieve on site. Local authorities can explore opportunities for using carbon offset funds and community energy funds as a way of delivering the concept of allowable solutions in their areas.

(1)Water Efficiency

5.38 Brentwood Water Cycle Study 2018^[15] identifies the borough as lying within an area of Serious Water Stress. A semi-arid climate and succession of dry winters can lead to groundwater levels within Brentwood being susceptible to multi-season droughts. The quality of the borough's watercourses is generally poor, while sewerage infrastructure in the north of the borough is operating at full capacity. The study recommends requiring all new developments to submit a water sustainability assessment and developers to demonstrate that they will achieve the water consumption reduction to Level 3/4 of the Code for Sustainable Homes for all residential developments and for non-residential developments to achieve BREEAM 'Very Good' standard for water consumption targets. As the Code for Sustainable Homes has been withdrawn, water conservation measures will be required to ensure a 110 litres per person per day limit, at the level formerly considered at Level 3-4 in line with the Water Cycle Study 2018.

5.39 Major developments are encouraged to incorporate more substantial water management measures, such as grey water harvesting. This is supported by the Interim Sustainability Appraisal (2016, paragraph 21.1.4 and 2018, paragraph 10.8.3).

5.40 For details on flood risk measures refer to Policy NE06 Flood Risk.

Renewable Energy Generation

5.41 Incorporating renewable energy generation and energy efficiency measures into new development will be essential in order to achieve carbon reduction targets. The government has set a target to deliver 15% of the UK's energy consumption from renewable sources by 2020 yet in 2016, only 8.9% of our energy was met by renewable generation^[16].

5.42 All developments should maximise opportunities for on-site electricity and heat production as well as use innovative building materials and smart technologies to reduce carbon emissions, reduce energy costs to occupants and improve the borough's energy resilience.

5.43 According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, 2018)^[17], renewable energy will be cheaper than fossil fuels by 2020 thanks to improvements in technology. The recent Global Status Report by REN21 (2018)^[18] also states that renewable energy currently makes up a fifth of the world's electrical power supply, and its capacity has doubled over the past ten years. Renewables are experiencing a virtuous cycle of technology improvement and cost reduction. How policies can support the ability to connect with supply grid, rather than viability, will be the main challenge in the transition towards the low carbon future.

Stand-alone renewable energy

5.44 It is acknowledged that standalone technologies such as large-scale wind turbines and photovoltaic (PV) arrays could be significant sources of energy. The resource assessment in the Brentwood Renewable Energy Study (2014) demonstrated that the borough's renewable energy target will not be possible without deploying large commercial scale renewable technologies. However, stand-alone renewable energy schemes would occur within and could impact on the Green Belt and would also be constrained by proximity to suitable connection to the national electricity grid. Therefore, whilst the Council would encourage opportunities for stand-alone renewable energy schemes within Brentwood, this will need careful consideration and be assessed on a case by case basis. Selection of the most appropriate locations would depend on balancing technical factors (such as proximity to substations) with minimising the impact of those developments through careful siting and mitigation measures. The Council would also support community-led initiatives for renewable and low carbon energy, including developments outside areas identified in local plans or other strategic policies that are being taken forward through neighbourhood planning, in line with the NPPF (2018, paragraph 152).

Decentralised energy

5.45 Decentralised energy broadly refers to energy that is generated off the main grid, including micro-renewables, heating and cooling. It can refer to energy from waste plants, combined heat and power, district heating and cooling, as well as geothermal, biomass or solar energy. Schemes can serve a single building or a whole community, even being built out across entire cities. Decentralised energy is a rapidly-deployable and efficient way to meet demand, whilst improving energy security and sustainability at the same time. Other benefits of decentralised energy include:

1. increased conversion efficiency (capture and use of heat generated, reduced transmission losses)
2. increased use of renewable, carbon-neutral and low-carbon sources of fuel
3. more flexibility for generation to match local demand patterns for electricity and heat
4. greater energy security for businesses that control their own generation
5. greater awareness of energy issues through community-based energy systems, driving a change in social attitudes and more efficient use of our energy resources

5.46 District heating and cooling systems (DH) are an important enabling technology for the use of renewables and need to be a central component of the decentralised system. DH can combine different sources of heat and can play a positive role in the integration of variable renewable energy. In 'the Future of Heating'^[19] the government highlighted the role for heat networks for delivering low carbon heat. District heating can be retrofitted for existing heat customers or installed in developments as part of a site wide low or zero carbon energy solution.

5.47 The East of England resource assessment and the Brentwood Renewable Energy Study 2014 suggest that there are unlikely to be major anchor and high heat density areas in the borough suitable for retrofit-only DH networks. New development will therefore play an important role in heat network development in the borough. Strategic allocations could offer great opportunities to expand the borough's decentralised energy infrastructure and were identified in the Brentwood IDP, these include:

1. Sites in the South Brentwood Growth Corridor masterplan area including Brentwood Enterprise Park and Dunton Hills Garden Village;
2. Warley extension masterplan area;
3. Officer's Meadows masterplan area.

5.48 According to the Brentwood Renewable Energy Study (2014), DH is a viable low and zero carbon energy solution for new development; the viability of DH and CHP schemes are improved with increased scale, density and mix of uses. Smaller sites close to large exiting loads, on the other hand, provide opportunities for collaboration which provides cost effective, energy efficient, low carbon heat and electricity.

5.49 The financial opportunity from DH schemes exists as there are economies of scale where the costs of providing a central heat source that also generates power, together with the associated distribution infrastructure, outweighs alternative means of complying with Part L. Where development occurs piecemeal, it is likely that individual developers for each site would choose traditional means of meeting Part L Building Regulations, which may result in a loss of opportunity.

5.50 Energy masterplanning at the large scale offers a unique opportunity to consider and plan for a robust infrastructure that will support the aspirations of a sustainable community – not only in terms of demand reduction, energy efficiency and renewable energy supply, but also in relation to water and waste management, transport and biodiversity. All these issues must be considered from the earliest stage and will have a major influence on the energy masterplan concept. Particular attention should be given to opportunities for utilizing existing decentralised and renewable or low-carbon energy supply systems and to fostering the development of new opportunities to supply proposed and existing development. Such opportunities could include co-locating potential heat customers and heat suppliers. Using the masterplanning process to map out zero-carbon and renewable energy opportunities in the area will help in identifying the potential for renewables at all scales, including community-scale schemes (TCPA, 2016, Practical Guides for Creating Successful New Communities, Guide 4: Planning for Energy and Climate Change).

5.51 An Energy Masterplan should identify:

1. major heat loads (including anchor heat loads, with particular reference to sites such as schools, hospitals and social housing);
2. heat loads from existing buildings that can be connected to future phases of a heat network major heat supply plant;
3. opportunities to utilise energy from waste;
4. secondary heat sources;
5. opportunities for low temperature heat networks;
6. land for energy centres and/or energy storage;
7. heating and cooling network routes;
8. opportunities for futureproofing utility infrastructure networks to minimise the impact from road works;
9. infrastructure and land requirements for electricity and gas supplies;
10. implementation options for delivering feasible projects, considering issues of procurement, funding and risk.

Building scale technologies

5.52 Brentwood Borough has relatively high levels of domestic gas and electricity consumption, therefore building-scale technologies have potentials to meet the borough's domestic energy demands. Building scale technologies often comprise permitted development and can be included in new development or retro-fitted to existing units. Building scale technologies with the greatest potential include rooftop solar technologies and biomass boilers in the commercial and industrial sector.

5.53 While the Council wishes to promote renewable and low carbon energy generation, there is also a need to balance this aim against other objectives for Brentwood, such as minimising pollution, and conservation, preservation and enhancement of the natural and historic environment.

5.54 Other policies in the local plan relating to the safeguarding of the natural and historic environment and the conservation and protection of national or locally designated sites and buildings should be taken into account in applications for energy schemes.

5.55 Potential impacts may be acceptable if they are minor, or are outweighed by wider benefits, including the environmental benefits associated with increased production of energy from renewable and low carbon sources, which will contribute to reducing carbon and other emissions.

5.56 In determining planning applications for the development of renewable or low-carbon energy, and associated infrastructure in the Green Belt, careful consideration will be given to the impacts of such projects on the Green Belt. Developers will need to demonstrate very special circumstances that clearly outweigh any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm if projects are to proceed.

5.57 In order for Brentwood to contribute to the national targets for carbon reduction, there is a need to reduce emissions from existing buildings as well as new ones. This policy seeks to utilise the opportunities that arise for making cost-effective energy efficiency improvements when works to extend existing homes are undertaken.

5.58 The aim of the policy is to help homeowners implement measures that will enhance the energy efficiency of their homes, helping to reduce fuel costs at a time of rising energy prices. Domestic emissions are sensitive to the weather; therefore, the installation of proper insulation, heating control, condensing boiler and draught proofing will help achieve efficient energy use whilst alleviate many causes of damp and mould.

5.59 If the property has an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC), this could also be submitted as part of the planning application to demonstrate the need to comply with the policy.

5.60 Care will need to be taken in applying the policy to listed buildings and other heritage assets, to ensure that they are not damaged by inappropriate interventions. The implementation of the policy will be case by case, with officers recommending measures that would be suitable for that particular property, bearing in mind its age, type of construction and historic significance. There may be cases where improvements cannot be made to an existing dwelling without causing harm to the significance of the heritage asset, and in such circumstances the requirements of this policy will not be implemented.

5.61 The Energy Saving Trust's website^[20] offers useful guides on energy efficiency improvements in the home, as well as the cost of these measures and how much they save home owners' energy bills.

5.62 For some, climate change and severe weather events could cause them discomfort; for others, especially children, the elderly, and those who have certain health conditions, the effects can be potentially lethal. According to the first UK Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA) in 2012, there are around 2,000 heat-related deaths in the UK; it projects that this number could more than double by the 2050s. Much of this increased risk is thought to be caused by exposure to high indoor temperatures. Overheating risks to health also emerged as one of the top six key risks where more action is required in the most recent UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017^[21].

5.63 The Climate Change Act (2008) and the NPPF (2018, paragraph 149) also require planning to take a proactive approach to mitigating and adapting to the risk of overheating from rising temperatures.

5.64 Many aspects of building design can lead to increases in overheating risk, including high proportions of glazing and an increase in the air tightness of buildings. There are a number of low-energy-intensive measures that can mitigate this risk; these include but not limit to solar shading, building orientation, solar-controlled glazing, living walls and green roof. For major developments, a landscape scheme integrating multi-functional green and blue infrastructure should be developed along the built form as this can be part of a sustainable and energy efficient development.

5.65 Developers should refer to most up to date guidance and best practice examples. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE) produces a series of guidance on assessing and mitigating overheating risk in new developments, in particular:

1. TM 59: Design Methodology for the Assessment of Overheating Risk in Homes - is relevant for domestic developments; and
2. TM52: The Limits of Thermal Comfort: Avoiding Overheating in European Buildings - is relevant for non-domestic developments.

These can also be applied to refurbishment projects.

Sustainable Drainage

(1)5.66 Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are the primary means by which increased surface run-off can be mitigated. They can manage run-off flow rates to reduce the impact of urbanisation on flooding, protect or enhance water quality and provide a multi-functional use of land to deliver biodiversity, landscape and public amenity aspirations. They do this by dealing with run-off and pollution as close as possible to its source and protect water resources from point pollution. SuDs allow new development in areas where existing drainage systems are close to full capacity, thereby enabling development within existing urban areas. Reference must be made to the criteria outlined in the Essex County Council SuDS Guide.

5.67 Wherever possible, Sustainable Drainage Systems techniques must be utilised to dispose of surface rainwater so that it is retained either on site or within the immediate area, reducing the existing rate of run-off. Such systems may include green roofs, rainwater attenuation measures, surface water storage areas, flow limiting devices and infiltration areas or soakaways. This approach is commonly known as the 'surface water management train' or 'source-to-stream'.

(1)5.68 The Environment Agency introduced a new classification system in 2011 enabled by The European Water Framework Directive. This system allows for more rigorous and accurate assessment of water quality. Some water bodies will never achieve good ecological status, however, because they have been physically altered for a specific use, such as navigation, recreation, water storage, or flood protection.

5.69 Essex County Council is the Lead Local Flood Authority. Applicants will need to prove compliance with the above drainage hierarchy and ensure sustainable drainage has been adequately utilised, taking into account potential land contamination issues and protection of existing water quality, in line with local and national policy and guidance.

5.70 The applicability of SuDS techniques for use on potential development sites will depend upon proposed and existing land-uses influencing the volume of water required to be attenuated, catchment characteristics and the underlying site geology.

5.71 When run-off does occur, treatment within SuDS components is essential for frequent rainfall events, for example up to 1:1 year return period event, where urban contaminants are being washed off urban surfaces, for all sites.

5.72 For rainfall events greater than the 1:1 event, it is likely that the dilution will be significant and will reduce the environmental risk. It is important that the SuDS design aims to minimise the risk of re-mobilisation and washout of any pollutants already captured by the system.

5.73 Developers are encouraged to refer to the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 2018 (which maps infiltration areas) and guidance provided by the Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA) for design criteria, technical feasibility, to ensure the future sustainability of the borough's drainage system. Essex County Council has produced a SuDS Design Guide (2015) to help steer what is expected from development to complement national requirements and prioritise local needs.

Communications Infrastructure

5.74 The Council recognises the growing importance of modern, effective telecommunications systems to serve local business and communities and their crucial role in the national and local economy.

5.75 High quality communications infrastructure including ultrafast broadband and mobile communication will be provided by working collaboratively with Essex County Council, communications operators and providers, and supporting initiatives, technologies and developments which increase and improve coverage and quality throughout the borough.

5.76 The government has committed to improving broadband access. As part of this commitment the Superfast Essex Programme aims to extend the fibre broadband network as far as possible in Essex. The Council will work with broadband infrastructure providers and Essex County Council to ensure as wider coverage as possible. Upgrades to existing and new communications infrastructure, including ultrafast broadband and mobile communication will be strongly supported, including masts, buildings and other related structures, to harness the opportunities arising from new high-quality communications.

5.77 The objective of this policy is to ensure the right balance is struck between providing essential telecommunications infrastructure, conserving and preserving the environment and local amenity, particularly in the borough's sensitive areas. By its nature, telecommunications development has the potential to have a significant impact on the environment and raises issues of visual and residential amenity. Mast and site sharing, using existing buildings and structures and a design led approach, disguising equipment where necessary, can help address these concerns. Therefore, planning applications must be accompanied by detailed supplementary information which provides the technical justification for the proposed development including the area of search, details of any consultation undertaken, the proposed structure and measures to minimise its visual impact.

5.78 Although the impact from telecommunications equipment on health is a source of public concern, the government has indicated that the planning system is not the place to determine health safeguards. However, the Council will nevertheless require all applicants to demonstrate their proposed installation complies with the latest national and international guidelines. This currently requires applicants to demonstrate they comply with the International Commission of Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP)^[23] which should take into account the cumulative impacts of all operators' equipment located on the mast/site.

5.79 Fast, reliable digital connectivity is essential in today's economy and especially for digital technology and creative sector. The provision for digital infrastructure is important for the functioning of development and should be treated with importance.

5.80 Digital connectivity supports smart technologies in terms of the collection, analysis and sharing of data on the performance of the built and natural environment, including for example, water and energy consumption, air quality, noise and congestion. Where it is appropriate and viable to do so, development should be fitted with smart infrastructure, such as sensors, to enable better collection and monitoring of such data. As digital connectivity and the capability of these sensors improves, and their cost falls, more and better data will become available to improve monitoring of planning agreements and impact assessments.

5.81 Digital connectivity also supports smart technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), wireless motion sensors and Virtual Reality (VR) which are increasingly used to assist an ageing population and people living with dementia, by reducing isolation, promoting independent living and assisting and complementing care and support.

5.82 Provision of high capacity broadband will support businesses and attract investment to Brentwood. It allows residents and businesses to access essential online services, social and commercial networks. It also has the potential to increase opportunities for home-working and remote-working, reducing the demand on travel networks at peak periods. The importance is demonstrated by recent census returns which show that the biggest change in journey to work patterns in the last 20 years has been the increase in people working from home.

5.83 The Council aspires to have ultrafast broadband or fastest available broadband at all new employment areas and all new residential developments through fibre to the premises/home (FTTP/H). Fibre to the curb, copper connections to premises and additional ducting for future provision will be considered if developers can show that FTTP/H is not viable or feasible.

5.84 It is recognised that at present, in some rural areas of the borough, fast, reliable broadband is not available as it is uneconomic or unviable to serve small numbers of properties in isolated locations. These places generally have poor access to other facilities and as such would not be expected to provide significant levels of growth. Lack of fast, reliable broadband or lack of scale to deliver broadband may be considered as unsustainable in these locations.

5.85 Where new development is proposed in rural areas, investment in superfast reliable broadband will be required, subject to viability. This means that developers should explore all the options, and evidence of this engagement should be submitted with a planning statement.

(13)Transport and Connectivity

Sustainable Transport

5.86 Sustainable transport is a key component of sustainable development, for its many benefits go beyond helping the environment. It encourages an active lifestyle, contributes to improving air and noise quality, helps improve public health, provides safer environments for children, increases social interaction in the neighbourhoods and can save travel time by reducing congestion.

5.87 Sustainable transport refers to:

1. Transport strategies that increases accessibility/mobility while minimising traffic volume and overall parking levels, for example allocating development in highly accessible locations, or providing public transport and a cycling network (Policy BE11 Strategic Transport Infrastructure, Policy BE12 Car-limited development, Policy BE13 Sustainable Means of Travel and Walkable Street, Policy BE14 Sustainable Passenger Transport, Policy BE17 Parking Standards)
2. Means of transport which reduces the impact on the environment such as sustainable public transport, low emission vehicles, vehicle charging points and car sharing, as well as non-motorised transport, such as walking and cycling (Policy BE14 Sustainable Passenger Transport, Policy BE15 Electric and Low Emission Vehicle,).
3. Mitigating the transport impact of development (Policy BE16 Mitigating the Transport Impacts of Development)

(2)5.88 Many aspects of transport and travel need to be considered, including reducing the need to travel, encouraging walking and cycling to reduce dependency on car travel and to improve public health, making public transport cleaner and more accessible to all users.

5.89 It is also important that we consider car ownership and be realistic about the fact that most households in the borough will own a car. While public transport links into London are good for Brentwood town and other areas along the transport corridors, villages are more remote with less good access. Therefore, it is acknowledged that some level of car travel and parking considerations will remain important for Brentwood as we consider the future.

5.90 This policy seeks to align strategic transport infrastructure improvements with Brentwood's proposed allocations and economic growth and to contribute to health and well-being whilst preserving the environment. This would be achieved by maximising the value of Elizabeth Line, improving the capacity of the stations and road network, ensuring the main settlements and new development have convenient access to high quality and frequent public transport services which connect to the town centre, main employment centres, rail stations, ports and airports in the wider region.

5.91 Development proposed within this Plan will only be deliverable and supported if suitable transport measures and investment are led, coordinated and, where appropriate, delivered by Brentwood Borough Council and strategic partners. Development should seek to enhance transport, particularly public transport, and wider connectivity between new and existing employment areas.

Maximising the value of railway connectivity and Elizabeth Line

(1)5.92 Previously known as Crossrail, the new Elizabeth Line is a 118 km railway under development crossing through the heart of London, enabling access between Reading and Heathrow in the west, through central London to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east. The full route is expected to be fully operational by December 2019. The arrival of Elizabeth Line will provide an improved and more frequent service to Brentwood's residents and visitors thus benefiting businesses and facilitating growth. The Council will work with partners to improve the station environment at both Brentwood and Shenfield stations, specifically in terms of non-motorised users and enhanced public transport access, with new forecourt and pedestrian crossing facilities.

5.93 It is expected that the introduction of this new railway will have both positive impacts, as a result of additional rail trips, and potentially negative impacts, with potential for increased travel by car to access the stations (Transport Assessment, PBA, 2018). There will be a need to monitor and review the situation once the services are operational. Any impacts identified should be addressed through the implementation and promotion of sustainable transport measures, for example the provision for non-car modes and the implementation of parking restrictions and pedestrian wayfinding system.

5.94 The proximity of new housing developments close to railway stations can provide the opportunity to improve cycling and walking infrastructure for shorter distance trips, to access rail services. Improving links to Brentwood and Shenfield stations will benefit both existing population as well as the new Local Plan developments within easy access of the stations. Proposed allocations and future development near Brentwood and Shenfield stations are required to demonstrate that the planning and design for movement connect well to the surrounding walking, cycling and public transport links to the station, and give priority to pedestrians and cyclists.

(3)Improvements to the train stations

5.95 In order to support a transit-oriented growth strategy and support projected travel demands from future development as well as provide the opportunity for non-motorist travel, it is important to achieve integration of transport modes. This should support regional trips by public transport and reduce pressure on the road network at the critical peak period. The Council will encourage improvements to the public realm surrounding existing train stations and look to improve access, interchange facilities, installation of wayfinding signs and introduce parking control where appropriate. Park and Ride/Cycle/Stride schemes to improve access to the stations will be considered subject to a future detailed feasibility study prepared by the Council.

(4)5.96 The railway stations in the borough have potentials to assist in providing additional benefits to sustainable travel. New development should seek to provide new or improved links and access to the station. Where appropriate contributions will therefore be sought from nearby developments:

1. Brentwood station: located on the Great Eastern Mainline, Brentwood station is served by TfL rail services operating between Shenfield and London Liverpool Street and Abellio Greater Anglia services operating between Southend Victoria and London. The emphasis on accessibility to both Shenfield and Brentwood stations will be on sustainable travel as a means of access, with improvements to pedestrian and cycle infrastructure and bus services, linking both new and existing developments near the stations, and on introducing new parking controls where needed to discourage parking around the stations, therefore reducing car travel.
2. Shenfield station: also located on the Great Eastern Mainline, Shenfield station is served by TfL and Greater Anglia rail services to Stratford and London Liverpool Street station and Greater Anglia services to Southend Victoria, Colchester Town, Ipswich, Braintree and Clacton-on-Sea, as well as some services to Norwich. From late 2019 it will be the terminus of the Elizabeth Line which will run from Reading and Heathrow Airport in the west through London. During 2014 JMP Associates undertook a station parking study for Shenfield prior to the development of the Elizabeth line. From the Rail User Survey carried out as part of the study, the study demonstrates that with the introduction of better bus services to the station, a reduction in the number of people who park at Shenfield who live in the vicinity as well as from any future Local Plan developments in the region could be witnessed, reducing overall traffic on the local network. As mentioned above, enhancement to Shenfield station would centre around improving pedestrian and cycle infrastructure and bus services and where necessary, parking controls.
3. West Horndon station: West Horndon station is on the London, Tilbury and Southend Railway line and is served by C2C with two trains per hour to London Fenchurch Street and Shoeburyness. It is currently identified that parking capacity is fully utilised most weekdays for commuters into London from the A127/A13 corridors. The location of a number of the Local Plan development sites will mean that West Horndon Station will play an important role in future transport provision. The Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018) proposed that over the lifetime of this Plan, the improvements to the station, bus and cycle infrastructure and interchange facilities are phased to create a new integrated transport hub. An increased capacity on the existing train service will be central to the new cycling, walking and bus movements of the new residents and employees. To ensure the new development will provide convenient access to the future interchange at West Horndon, the Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018) proposed that interim bus service(s) connecting the developments sites to the interchange should be built into the development agreements to be funded. This should allow time for enough customer demand for a commercial operator to take on the routes. This is particularly the case with Dunton Hills where new opportunities will exist.
4. Ingatestone station: Ingatestone railway station is on the Great Eastern Main Line, currently served by Greater Anglia. New development should seek to provide new or improve links and access to Ingatestone station.

Delivering improvements to the highway infrastructure capacity

5.97 As the backbone of our transport system, roads keep the population connected and the economy flowing. In light of planned development, it is important to grasp the opportunity to transform our roads and the experience of driving on them, whilst also addressing strategic imperatives such as economic growth and climate change.

5.98 It should be noted, however, that providing additional highway capacity will only have a short-term impact and may be quickly taken up by suppressed traffic. Therefore, investment in providing alternatives is important. Non-highway measures^[25] such as sustainable transport measures and behavioural change that go beyond physical improvements could assist in alleviating pressures on the highway network. These measures are embedded in other policies in this Plan.

5.99 The Council is working with Associations of South Essex Local Authorities (ASELA) to prepare a statutory Joint Strategic Plan (JSP) which will identify ways to transform transport connectivity, among other required work to deliver growth. This work will inform public transport services needed to follow suit if the wider development needs of south east England are to be sustainably provided.

5.100 In Brentwood, the strategic highway infrastructure includes:

1. the A12 which connects the market town and major settlements in central Brentwood Borough to London and the wider region, providing access to services, jobs and recreation;
2. the A127 which travels through the south of Brentwood Borough and connects it to London, Basildon, Rochford, Southend, Southend Airport and surrounding employment areas. The A127 corridor is a vitally important primary route for the south of Essex;
3. the M25 in the west which connects Brentwood Borough to London and Stansted Airport;
4. and associated key junctions.

5.101 The Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018) assessed how the highway network within the borough copes at a strategic level as a result of the new Local Plan Development and committed developments within adjacent local authorities that would likely have an impact on Brentwood Borough highways. This work identified a number of junctions that may require mitigation as well as a number of non-highway^[26]related mitigation measures. The results of the modelling and junction assessments highlight the need to continue to monitor throughout the Local Plan period to identify any additional impact from other schemes on the highway network in Brentwood, such as the Lower Thames Crossing project, the A127 and any highway effect from the opening of the Elizabeth Line. Since the level of growth planned along the A127 and A12 are reliant on new and improved strategic infrastructure of regional and national importance (including the Lower Thames Crossing), the Council will continue to work with the highway authority (Essex County Council), statutory bodies (including Highways England), the Essex Heart and Haven Strategic Transport Boards^[27] other partners (including the ASELA and the A127 Task Force), and developers to secure the mitigation measures to the highways and related junctions to deliver growth. The impact of individual access junctions for individual sites would be expected to be undertaken by promoters of individual sites.

(2)5.102 It is recognised that existing mitigation undertaken by third parties is being considered and will assist in improving capacity of the highway network in the borough. These include:

1. A127/A128: several studies, led by Essex County Council, have been progressing on the A127 corridor between Southend-on-Sea in the East to the M25 in the west, the final section of this road is within Brentwood Borough. Within the A127 Corridor for Growth study^[28] there are individual pieces of work currently at various stages of planning and development, many of which are focussed on interchange capacity and/or safety improvements. Continued joint working with ECC and other neighbouring authorities will be important, so any outcomes from this study can feed through to the South Brentwood Growth Corridor Masterplan;
2. M25 Junction 28: Highways England are currently undertaking work to develop improvements at M25 Junction 28^[29]. Further engagement will be required with Highways England on this scheme;
3. M25 Junction 29: mitigation measures at this junction are being considered with the aim to improve the junction's operation with the introduction of the Brentwood Enterprise Park. Proposals for the Lower Thames Crossing route that impact M25 Junction 29 will need further consideration as part of these overall aims.

5.103 Brentwood high schools and some primary schools are very attractive not only to residents within the borough, but also for many children from the surrounding Essex and London authorities. The five high schools located in the central area of Brentwood Borough generate a significant volume of parents dropping off and picking up their children; therefore, the impact of an increasing population of children and school related traffic should be taken into consideration as a part of mitigation measures to the highway network. Development in proximity to schools and education facilities should be designed with priority given to safety and convenience of pupils' walking, cycling to school, as well as other measures that can address the impacts of school run traffic, in line with ECC's Developers Guide to Infrastructure Contributions.

5.104 For Central Brentwood Growth Corridor, the Council is considering a sustainable transport strategy to help address traffic and associated air quality issues, based on non-highway measures identified in the Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018), options including but not limited to School Clear Zones and Low Emission Zone:

1. The School Clear Zones concepts seeks to remove school related trips from the town centre and to encourage greater use of non-car modes for such trips. In these zones, vehicles will be restricted from stopping, parking for drop off during AM/PM peak hour. The pupils will be encouraged to walk or cycle from drop off zones to relieve pressure on the highway network. The measure has the added benefit of encouraging more physical activity for children their parents, and all other users to walk or cycle from a reasonable distance. In addition, it would help improve air quality and address illegal car parking affecting residents living close to the schools. The Council intends to continue exploring the potential and deliverability of this concept;
2. A Low Emission Zone is a defined area where access by polluting vehicles is restricted or deterred with the aim of improving the air quality. This may favour vehicles such as alternative fuel vehicles, electric vehicles, or zero-emission vehicles. Currently feasibility analysis is being considered for Low Emission Zone as part of a long-term assessment (Brentwood IDP, 2018).
3. Other measures and behavioural change measures are detailed under Policy BE16 Mitigating the Transport Impacts of Development, and can also be found in the Transport Assessment (2018).

(4)5.105 For South Brentwood Growth Corridor, there is a recognition that provision of sustainable transport in this area is poor. To mitigate the impact of future development on the highway network in the South, the Council will work proactively with developers, key stakeholders and service providers to implement new area-specific sustainable transport measures, which would seek to mitigate transport impacts of sites on the highway infrastructure, improve bus links across the area and improve capacity of West Horndon station. The measures would also seek to reduce the impacts of northward movements into central Brentwood. Where northward movement happens, they should be undertaken by electric car club vehicles, electric bikes or bus.

(2)5.106 It is considered that the preferred route of the Lower Thames Crossing, developed by Highways England, will have impacts on opportunities as well as cumulative impact on the local and strategic transport network. The Lower Thames Crossing is a proposed new road crossing of the River Thames which will connect the counties of Essex (north) and Kent (south). The planned route is expected to run from the M25 near North Ockendon, cross the A13 at Orsett before crossing under the Thames east of Tilbury and Gravesend. A new link road will then take traffic to the A2 near Shorne, close to where the route becomes the M2. At this stage, information on the impact of this scheme on the highway network in Brentwood is limited. The impact of the scheme on travel in the borough will need to be reviewed as the scheme progresses, in particular, if delivery of the scheme comes forward during the Plan period.

(2)5.107 The Lower Thames Crossing Statutory Consultation commenced on October 10^th 2018^[30], the forecast reporting released as part of the consultation evidence does not provide detailed analysis of flow changes on the A128 and A127; however, the non-technical summary identifies a reduction in traffic on these links, demonstrating that this is likely to have a beneficial effect in the operation at these junctions. Currently, Highways England anticipate that, subject to funding and planning consent, the scheme would open in 2027, within the Plan period. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the timescales for the delivery of this scheme (Transport Assessment 2018, PBA).

5.108 While the aim will be to offer a choice of transport, reducing dependency on the car will reduce congestion and pollution and improve resilience in the face of future fuel shortages or price rises. The government's Active Travel Strategy (Department of Health and Department for Transport, 2010) aims to get more people walking and cycling in recognition of the many benefits these bring. As the Strategy notes, walking or cycling can be quicker and cheaper than driving or taking public transport for many short trips and are an easy way to become more physically active thereby improving health and well-being.

(2)5.109 The dominance of vehicles on streets is a significant barrier to walking and cycling and reduces the appeal of streets as public places. When properly implemented in appropriate locations, car-limited development could have significant benefits including:

1. accommodating more dwellings on a given site, without overdeveloping;
2. leaving more space for landscaping and green space;
3. safer streets for children's play, and more social interaction;
4. reduced car dependency, while supporting walking, cycling, public transport and local car clubs;
5. less traffic congestion and pollution associated with the new development.

5.110 Larger car-limited developments will be encouraged to incorporate a car club, which can be an attractive alternative to private car ownership and boost the attractiveness of car-limited housing.

(1)5.111 Securing public transport improvements and better provision for walking and cycling would reduce pollution, make it safer and easier for people to travel to jobs and services and lead to better health, less congestion and more pleasant streets.

(1)5.112 This policy seeks to encourage people to make sustainable travel choices by improving choices and making development easily accessible by different modes of transport, especially walking, cycling and public transport. An important policy tool to achieve this is the modal hierarchy. All major development should follow the modal hierarchy by providing access for all of the following (most preferable first, least preferable last):

1. walking and providing access for all, including people with mobility impairment;
2. cycling;
3. public transport;
4. powered two wheelers;
5. commercial vehicles and taxis;
6. car sharing;
7. electric and low emission vehicles;
8. private cars.

5.113 Streets account for a major part of public spaces; high quality streets are therefore fundamental to the character and efficient functioning of a place and play a fundamental role in moving people around safely, improving public realm and providing spaces for people to come together. New major development should create permeable, accessible, inclusive and multifunctional streets that promotes active lifestyle and integrates different modes of transport in line with Policy HP13 Creating Successful Places. Barriers to walking should be addressed in development proposals, to ensure that walking is promoted and that street conditions, especially safety/security and accessibility for disabled people, are enhanced. Walking networks and facilities in and around all new developments should be direct, safe, attractive, accessible and enjoyable.

5.114 Cycling is a space efficient mode compared to cars so making streets attractive for cycling can bring benefits to all road users while also improving the experience of living, working and getting around. Although further consultation will be required, once finalised the Brentwood Cycling Action Plan (2018)^[31] can:

1. identify how cycling levels can be increased in the borough;
2. enable any funding for new cycling schemes in Brentwood to be prioritised;
3. create a usable, high-quality cycle network that connects residential areas with key employment locations, rail stations and town centres; and
4. create opportunities to increase recreational cycling in Brentwood.

5.115 Cycling will be promoted through the provision of improved cycle parking and other facilities and new cycle routes as part of highway infrastructure improvements/traffic management measures and, where appropriate, in association with planning permission for new development. Development should facilitate and encourage cycling to reduce car dependency and the health problems it creates. When providing for cycle parking, cycle parking areas should be secure and covered, and allow easy access for occupiers and their visitors, and provide facilities for all, including disabled cyclists. This could include identifying and reserving specific spaces which provide step-free cycle parking and opportunities for people using adapted cycles, as well as providing facilities for other non-standard cycles such as tricycles, cargo bicycles and bicycles with trailers. Space for folding bicycles should be provided as well as space for conventional bikes to cater for rail commuters. However, space for folding bicycles is not an acceptable alternative to conventional cycle parking as these are less popular in some areas, tend to be less affordable and present difficulties for some users. Surface level parking is preferable to stacked parking which may be difficult for some people to use. Visitor parking should be quickly and easily accessible to front entrances of buildings and not require cyclists to visit parts of a site restricted to occupiers only. Developers should refer to the vehicle parking standards set out in the Essex Parking Standards (2009) or as amended, in line with Policy BE17 Parking Standards.

5.116 The Council strongly supports contributions to and provision for car clubs at new developments to help reduce the need for private car parking.

5.117 The Council will work with partners and stakeholders to facilitate and promote sustainable transport links from new development to key destinations and the wider network. This include new or improved infrastructure, services and promotion to support walking, cycling and public transport, and provision of charging points for electric vehicles. The Sustainable Modes of Travel Strategy (SMOTS) produced by Essex County Council provides a framework for the Council and its partners to co-ordinate the provision of services and infrastructure to achieve its objectives.

5.118 The Essex County Council's Transportation Development Management Policies provide further detail on requirements relating to accessibility and access, including Transport Assessment and Statement thresholds for each land use category.

5.119 Passenger transport, including bus, school bus, rail, taxis and private hire vehicles play a significant role in enabling access to facilities and services across the borough and to destinations in other authorities' areas. They also provide people with travel choices and can contribute to addressing congestion and offsetting the environmental impacts of travel.

5.120 The Council, in consultation with relevant partners, will seek the retention of existing bus and rail services and, where viable, encourage improved and new services. Support will be given to the refurbishment of rail station buildings and other improvements in facilities for public transport users including transport interchange improvements.

(1)5.121 Brentwood and the surrounding area are served by multiple bus operators; the most frequent are First Bus, Stagecoach and Ensign Bus. There is potential in future, with the pattern of development, to provide improved bus services linking key residential areas, both existing and those proposed through the local plan, employment and railway stations. The Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018) highlights that there is an opportunity to provide services that will link Dunton Hills Garden Village (and Basildon), West Horndon Station, Brentwood Enterprise Park, Childerditch Business Park and Brentwood (including the station), which if providing a high-quality express service between these key origins and destinations would provide a realistic alternative to the private car. Moving forward, in addition to traditional bus services, demand responsive services could be considered as a part of sustainable transport measures.

5.122 The Council would support the commencement of passenger transport in large scale developments at the earliest opportunity, which should be considered to be the responsibility of the developer. The Council will seek to secure additional passenger transport facilities and service funding to enable the existing routes to be enhanced in terms of frequency, quality, connectivity and coverage where appropriate.

5.123 According to the Brentwood Renewable Energy Study^[32], transport emissions in Brentwood are higher than the national average, due to increased car ownership and access to vehicles. Electric or other low emission vehicles will help reduce pollution, climate change impacts, oil use from the transport sector while improving energy independence, air and noise quality, thus well-being of Brentwood residents.

5.124 The development of a robust infrastructure network is widely considered a key requirement for a large-scale transition to electromobility. Research^[33] has found that the availability of public charging is generally linked with electric vehicle uptake as providing charging stations can help meet charging demand and increase electric vehicle consumer confidence. Highways England has plans to install charging infrastructure every 20 miles along the major road network as part of its Road Investment Strategy^[34].

5.125 The Council may seek infrastructure for electric and low emission vehicle where it is appropriate and viable. This could be in the form of public charging infrastructure or make-ready infrastructure for charging stations. The design and operation of such infrastructure should follow best practice so that their operation would not undermine the quality of public realm nor refract from the shift towards active travel.

5.126 In addition, the provision of private charging infrastructure at home and at workplace will be encouraged:

1. Home charging stations could help to make electric vehicles more accessible. In multi-unit dwellings, where residents frequently do not have dedicated parking spots, installation of charging infrastructure in shared parking facilities or public curbside charging stations could be sought. The UK Government's Office for Low Emission Vehicles currently offers incentive programs towards the up-front cost of each electric vehicle charge point purchased and installed to defray the added costs of charging infrastructure at home^[35].
2. Workplace charging can serve as the primary charging opportunity for drivers without a dedicated home charge point, allowing increased flexibility for drivers who commute with their electric vehicle. Since cars charging at a workplace tend to be plugged in for many hours during the middle of the day, it is an ideal setting for smart charging programs and could further the integration between electric vehicles and daytime renewable energy, especially solar. Pilots projects in the UK^[36] and elsewhere^[37] have shown that people are much more likely to switch to electric vehicles if there is access to charging infrastructure at their workplace. The UK Government's Office for Low Emission Vehicles offers financial support^[38] towards the cost of installing EV charging to encourage organisations to install electric vehicle charging facilities at their workplace.

5.127 Traffic congestion and road capacity remain key issues on the borough's transport network and the need to mitigate their impacts and to promote modal shift remains imperative, especially as growth in and around Brentwood increases.

5.128 Joint working is being undertaken with Highways England, Essex County Council (highways authority), developers and all relevant partners to identify necessary mitigations at key junctions, to consider the cumulative impact of growth within the borough over the Plan period, and to consider the wider planned growth on the local and strategic route network.

5.129 Development resulting in an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or significant and harmful residual cumulative impacts on the road network will be prevented or refused on highways grounds, unless any impact will be effectively mitigated to an acceptable degree, in line with the NPPF (2018).

5.130 Developments should also provide adequate provision for servicing and public service vehicles.

5.131 As noted earlier in this chapter, providing physical improvements to the highway will only have a short-term impact therefore it is important to invest in long term alternatives. The Council will work with developers and service providers to consider potential sustainable transport measures that could assist in reducing the impact of developments on the overall road network. The Transport Assessment (PBA, 2018) identifies a number of non-highway mitigation measures that could be implemented in Brentwood Borough; feasibility analysis for some of these measures are being considered in the in the Brentwood IDP as part of a long-term assessment. These include:

1. School Clear Zone;
2. Park and Ride/ Cycle/ Stride;
3. 'Quietway' cycle routes;
4. Low Emission Zone;
5. Banning all large freight vehicle from stopping deliveries within the Central Brentwood zone and A128 corridor during AM/PM peaks;
6. Car-limited development at appropriate locations;
7. Pedestrian wayfinding system;
8. Multiple service app making access to smart car hire/ community buses/ booking bikes/ bike hire schemes etc. easier;
9. Encourage clean vehicles and introduce electrical parking points to encourage use of such vehicles and plan and deliver other IT infrastructure required to allow future implementation of emerging SMART systems;
10. Multi-modal integration at rail stations.

5.132 This policy should be read in conjunction with Policy BE11 Strategic Transport Infrastructure, BE12 Car-limited Development, BE13 Sustainable Means of Travel and Walkable Streets and BE14 Sustainable Passenger Transport. Aims to reduce pollution levels from transport can also be linked to Policies BE18 Green and Blue Infrastructure, NE05 Air Quality, and SP03 Health Impact Assessments.

(1)Managing Parking

5.133 The Council will continue to promote lower levels of private car parking to help achieve modal shift, particularly for non-residential developments where more sustainable transport alternatives such as walking, cycling and public transport exist. This will be particularly important in the Town Centre, where the transport strategy is to increase access without an increase in overall parking levels.

5.134 Car parking standards are an important means of managing traffic levels in and around a development, especially when combined with measures to increase access to transport alternatives to the private car.

5.135 Developers should account for the following when proposing the level of car parking for a site:

1. the location of the development, in terms of whether the site has convenient walkability and cyclability to the Town Centre, District Shopping Centres, major employment centres, and whether or not it has high public transport accessibility;
2. the type of development (fringe site, infill site, etc.) - infill sites are much more likely to be located in areas with existing travel patterns, behaviours and existing controls, and may be less flexible;
3. the type of residence (houses, flats, etc.) - houses tend to have higher car ownership than flats, even if they have the same number of habitable rooms;
4. local car ownership levels;
5. for developments requiring a Transport Assessment, it should be demonstrated that the level of parking proposed is consistent with the recommendations of this Transport Assessment;
6. the need to ensure an adequate provision of spaces for charging plug-in and other ultra-low emission vehicles. Electric vehicle charging points or the infrastructure to ensure their future provision should be provided within a development where reasonable and proportionate; and
7. adequate provision should be made for efficient deliveries and servicing.

5.136 Brentwood Borough Council adopted the Essex Parking Standards as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) in 2011 and will expect these standards to apply until such time as they are revoked or superseded by other standards. This document sets out a range of standards to be applied depending on the proposed use of new development, such as minimum parking for residential development to address issues of on-street parking and maximum standards for parking in non-residential developments in order to encourage more sustainable transport methods. This document is subject to revision by Essex County Council in light of changes made to the NPPF (July 2018).

5.137 Parking associated with offices has the potential to generate car travel in the morning and evening peaks when streets are the most congested. This makes bus travel less reliable and active travel less attractive and road network more congested in some parts of the borough. Office parking also has the potential to induce car dependence even where alternatives to the car exist. Census 2011 origin and destination statistics indicate that workers commuting to Brentwood from the surrounding local authorities mainly commute by car. Reduced office parking provision where alternative choices are convenient and available can facilitate higher-density development and support the creation of mixed and vibrant places that are designed for people rather than vehicles. Applicants should ensure that the use of non-car modes are provided for where appropriate.

5.138 It is important that local retail and leisure sector businesses are provided with suitable facilities to continue to thrive. Current parking provision in Brentwood Town Centre, District Shopping Centres and Local Centres often have negative visual impacts yet does not always meet parking space demands of shoppers and visitors. The Council seeks to improve the quality of parking so that it is convenient, safe and secure, alongside measures to promote accessibility for pedestrians and cyclists.

5.139 The shared parking provision in the Town Centre and District Shopping Centres is encouraged to allow visitors, shoppers and commuters to share parking facilities at different times of the day and week and to relieve the current high parking demands in these areas.

5.140 Free commuter parking could contribute to congestion and pollution, it also undermines public transport, including park-and-ride and rural bus services. Reducing free commuter parking will therefore reduce congestion and pollution and create demand for public transport. The net effect will be to start a virtuous circle of more convenient and reliable bus services attracting more passengers, creating demand for an expansion in services.

5.141 The quantum of any parking provision, as well as its design and implementation, should have regard to the need to promote active modes and public transport use. The operation of car and cycle parking and the associated public realm should be designed and managed in a way that it would not have negative transport, visual and safety impacts on the surrounding areas, and that under-utilised parking space is converted to other uses such as additional cycle parking, amenity space or green and blue infrastructure. Parking provision should be flexible for different users and adaptable to future re-purposing in the context of changing requirements, including technological change. Applicants should refer to best practice and guidance on the design, layout, landscaping and lighting of parking as set out in the Essex Design Guide, Brentwood Town Centre Design Guide and British Parking Association.

Green and Blue Infrastructure

5.142 There are a number of definitions of green and blue infrastructure (GBI) ^{[39] [40] [41]}, all share the same notion in which GBI can be understood as natural or semi-natural networks of green (soil covered or vegetated) and blue (water covered) spaces and corridors that maintain and enhance ecosystem services; it is capable of supporting and enhancing biodiversity and geodiversity, improving air and/or water quality, enhancing and conserving the historic environment, providing recreational or cultural experiences as well as enriching the quality of life of local communities.

(1)5.143 In Brentwood, GBI includes open space, woodlands, wildlife habitat, parks, registered commons, villages and town greens, nature reserves, recreational sports facilities, cemeteries, allotments, gardens, waterways and bodies of water, historic parks and gardens and historic landscapes. Figure 5.7 sets out the GBI typology which is based upon the Green Infrastructure Strategy^[42], Sport, Leisure and Open Space Assessment^[43], Natural England's Green Infrastructure Guidance^[44].

Type of GI	Key Policy Elements
Parks and Gardens	County Parks, Borough Parks and Recreation Grounds, Historic Parks and Gardens.
Ecological assets and natural and semi-natural greenspaces (urban / rural)	Special Sites of Scientific Interest (SSSI), Local Nature Reserves (LNR), Local Wildlife Sites (LoWS), Woodlands, Geological Assets, Grasslands, Thames Chase Forest, other assets.
Green and blue corridors	Main rivers, large ordinary/ non-main river watercourses, major tributaries, wetland, hedgerows, major road corridors, major rail corridors, cycling routes/ network, pedestrian paths and rights of way, Protected Lanes.
Outdoor sports facilities and provision for children and teenagers	Natural green surfaces: tennis courts, bowling greens, sports pitches, golf courses, school and other institutional playing fields, and other outdoor sports areas. Green formal/ informal recreation areas for children/ teenagers.
Amenity greenspace	Amenity greenspace, village greens, commons, other informal greenspace, Protected Urban Open Space, Local Green Space.
Allotments	Typically Parish and Council owned/ managed.
Cemeteries and churchyards	Public and privately-owned facilities.
Classified landscapes and accessible urban fringe countryside	Ancient Landscapes.
Other GI	Private gardens.

Figure 5.3: Brentwood Green and Blue Infrastructure Typology

5.144 GBI as a design approach considers the effects and problems of modern development, it promotes a sensibility that accepts the interwoven worlds of the human and the natural and seeks to more fully and intelligently design human environments in harmony with the conditions of setting, environment, and climate change^[45].

(1)5.145 The Council will protect and enhance local distinctiveness and plan positively for the creation, preservation and enhancement of networks of biodiversity and GBI in line with the Council's Green Infrastructure Strategy (2015). As part of planning for infrastructure provision, the Council will work with statutory bodies, infrastructure providers including Essex County Council and utilities companies and consider the roles of developers in providing and maintaining the GBI that is required as a result of new growth.

5.146 This policy is in line with the NPPF, as well as the government's latest environment plan: A Green Future: Our 25 Year Plan to Improve the Environment^[46] which sets out a long-term vision for England's environment post-Brexit, along with some medium-term aspirations for progress, and some shorter-term actions. The plan stresses the importance of good-quality green and blue infrastructure (GBI) and commits to creating a 'national framework of green infrastructure standards, ensuring that new developments include accessible green spaces and that any area with little or no green space can be improved for the benefit of the community'. The Local Plan policies will seek to achieve a net gain for biodiversity by providing new green spaces including high quality green infrastructure built into the designs and masterplans of new development.

5.147 It is vital that the right infrastructure is in place to support future growth in the borough, and this includes GBI. There is a need to better link formal and informal open spaces in the borough to improve their wider use and value, as highlighted by the Brentwood Green Infrastructure Strategy (2015). Existing GBI should be protected and enhanced and where opportunities arise, e.g. in conjunction with new development, additional provision made.

5.148 There is a growing and compelling body of evidence substantiating the potential for GBI to contribute to the economic, social and environmental well-being of individuals and society; for example, access to the countryside, sport and recreation facilities can promote active and healthy lifestyles through the enhancement of walking and cycling. Strategic scale and more local GBI can make a vital contribution to quality of place and health outcomes if properly integrated into the design and delivery of new development.

5.149 It is widely acknowledged that GBI and open space has a major role to play in mitigating against and adapting to climate change, for example, urban cooling, encouraging sustainable travel choices, flood alleviation and supporting habitats. Through the provision of GBI the policy can help overcome habitat fragmentation and improve the ability of the natural environment to adapt to climate change and habitat loss by improving ecological connectivity.

5.150 Landscape, parks and open space often have heritage interest, and can play a key role in enhancing and conserving the historic environment. It can be used to improve the setting of heritage assets and to improve access to it. Likewise, heritage assets can help contribute to the quality of green spaces by helping to create a sense of place and a tangible link with local history. Opportunities can be taken to link GBI networks into already existing landscapes or green spaces in towns or existing historic spaces such as church yards, town paths, verges etc. as well as larger designed landscapes to improve the setting of and access to historic buildings or historic townscape. Maintenance of GBI networks and spaces should also be considered so that they continue to serve as high quality places which remain beneficial in the long term.

(1)5.151 Brentwood rivers and their valleys form an attractive and important ecological, leisure and recreation resource. The rivers are valued by residents and used as corridors of movement by people and wildlife. They also contain floodplains that provide flood storage capacity. The River Wid is located within the Anglian River Basin District and the Roding, Beam and Ingrebourne catchment and Mar Dyke lie within the Thames River Basin District. They contribute to the objectives of the Water Framework Directive, the Thames and Anglian River Basin Management Plan.

(1)5.152 According to the Brentwood Water Cycle Study (2018), watercourses in the study area are either of Poor or Moderate Status; therefore, new development proposals need to ensure construction does not result in deterioration and where necessary, provide protection, enhancement and buffering of watercourses. This includes the provision of ecological buffer strips and corridors, native tree planting and the new wetland areas to help manage flood risk and reduce diffuse pollution whilst connecting people to nature. This could also include de-culverting, removal of redundant structures, alien species removal where appropriate.

5.153 According to the TCPA's guidance Planning for Green and Prosperous Places^[47], as time goes by, GBI usually becomes increasingly valuable, but only if it is well maintained. This guidance also emphasises on the importance of maintaining GBI. Therefore, when planning GBI, the following should be considered from the earliest stage:

• revenue funding: to pay for the care of the GBI in perpetuity;
• capital funding: to pay for creating the GBI; and
• the design of the GBI: which will affect the cost of maintaining it as well as the cost of creating it.

5.154 Proposals that provide appropriate GBI which is well integrated with the existing and new development and with the surrounding area will be supported. In progressing an allocation, strategic consideration should be given to additional mitigation measures, for example planning for the provision of 'off-site' compensatory habitats to address likely residual impacts upon Priority Habitats and Species, and long-term financial support to land managers of nearby green and blue infrastructure that may be subject to significant additional recreational pressure.

(1)5.155 The strategic allocation of Dunton Hills Garden Village is located between three living landscape areas; other strategic allocations in the south of the borough, such as the Enterprise Park and West Horndon Industrial Estate redevelopment are also likely to have cumulative impacts on the landscape. However, they also present significant opportunities to establish a strategic framework that deliver a positive contribution to the local ecological network. The quantity, quality, accessibility and distribution of GBI across the area will be considered in site policies in Chapter 9 and development masterplan frameworks.

(1)5.156 Development should seek to deliver green and blue infrastructure network in the borough. The strategic planning, implementation and management of GBI requires a co-ordinated approach from a multi-disciplinary, cross-organisational team of partners, for example, Highways England, Essex County Council, Natural England, Thames Chase Forest, Essex Wildlife Trust, the Council's public health team, as well as voluntary groups.

5.157 This policy should be read in conjunction with Policy BE08 Sustainable Drainage, Policy HP18 Designing Landscape and the Public Realm, Policy BE19 Access to Nature, Policy NE01 Protecting and Enhancing the Natural Environment, and Policy NE06 Flood Risk.

5.158 The Health Foundation identifies 'our surroundings' as one of eight factors, outside of health care, that influence people's opportunity to live a healthy life^[48]. In addition, potential mitigations to adult health and social care pressure are rooted in better access to and more regular use of green open space. Effective planning and delivery of GBI at all levels is vital if it is to be delivering health outcomes^[49].

5.159 Ambient access to nature carries its own benefits, but the Council encourages interventions that use active connection to nature to achieve improved health and positive lifestyle. GBI need not be difficult or expensive to implement, it can be delivered one step at a time when resources are available. Small and micro scale greening interventions such as pocket park, courtyard garden, green roofs/wall, can be as valuable as large scale GBI in building the pieces of the network. Integrating micro GBI in the built environment can arguably has some of the most significant effects, for example enhancing microclimate, addressing the urban heat island effect, improving water management, creating community cohesion, influencing use and behaviour.

5.160 Fragile or high-input landscape features (for example, intensive green walls) could fail their purpose if not properly installed or maintained. This applies to other aspects of building design and construction and should be addressed by ensuring that any proposed greening intervention is supported by appropriate specification and maintenance plans.

5.161 This policy should be read in conjunction with Policy HP13 Creating Successful Places, Policy HP16 Buildings Design, Policy HP18 Designing Landscape and the Public Realm, Policy BE18 Green and Blue Infrastructure, Policy BE22 Open Space in New Development, and Policy BE23 Open Space, Community, Sport and Recreational Facilities.

5.162 Local community food growing space not only helps to improve social integration and community cohesion but can also contribute to improved mental and physical health and well-being. It supports healthy living by enabling residents make more sustainable food choices, protects local ecosystems and fosters community spirit and enterprise. It also helps reduce the carbon footprint of food production by minimising CO₂ emissions from transporting food and is beneficial for air quality by helping to reduce pollution.

5.163 The wider benefits of growing produce are identified in the Brentwood Open Space, Sport and Leisure Assessment (2016)^[50] which highlights that providing opportunities for people to grow their own food contributes to sustainability, health and social inclusion.

5.164 The Council therefore aims to safeguard land for garden and allotment, promotes local food growing by encouraging development proposals to include spaces for residents and communities to grow their own food. This would enable and support healthy lifestyles, in line with the NPPF (2018, paragraph 91).

5.165 There are no currently nationally adopted standards of provision for allotments: the old Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (PPG17) referred to a standard of 0.2 ha of allotments per 1,000 people whereas the National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners (NSALG) recommends a standard equivalent to 0.23 ha of allotments per 1000 people.

5.166 The Brentwood Open Space, Sport and Leisure Assessment (2016)^[51] and the updated calculations in the Brentwood IDP (2018)^[52] estimate the total amount of allotments in Brentwood Borough to be around 16-17 ha; based upon a borough population of 73,601 (2011 Census), this equates to circa 0.22ha of allotments per 1000 people, which is broadly in line with the old PPG17 standard and NSALG recommended standard.

5.167 However, the level of growth planned within this Plan period will lead to an increased population and there will be a need to consider how future development can be planned to meet the growing need.

5.168 The Council are proposing to declare all existing Council owned allotment sites in the borough as having statutory status so they enjoy the legal protection provided by the Allotments Act 1925. Further engagement work is also required to understand whether the current allotment infrastructure have opportunities to accommodate additional growth or additional provision will be needed.

5.169 Opportunities may be available to provide new allotment space as part of the GBI provision in large and strategic housing development.

5.170 When allotments are provided on site as part of a development, developers should pay for the future maintenance and management of the allotments and arrange for a management body to undertake that responsibility for the life of the development. Where, land is transferred to the Borough or Parish Councils, an agreed maintenance contribution should be made. It is expected that the developer will maintain the allotment for twelve months before it transfers it to the borough or relevant parish council with the payment of a commuted sum to cover 20 years maintenance. Developer contributions for off-site provision could include the enhancement of nearby allotment facilities.

5.171 Innovative solutions to small scale food growing space will be encouraged, such as green roofs/walls, re-utilising existing under-used spaces and incorporating spaces for food growing in new schools.

5.172 Forecast of additional allotment land requirements across the borough and at selected strategic sites is detailed in the Brentwood IDP (2018).

5.173 This policy should be read in conjunction with Policy BE18 Green and Blue Infrastructure, Policy BE23 Open Space, Community, Sport and Recreational Facilities.

(4)5.174 As the definition of Previously Developed Land within the NPPF excludes private residential gardens and allotment, inappropriate development of garden and allotment sites will be resisted. Proposals that are considered to be appropriate on garden or allotment sites in accordance with the criteria set out in this policy will still be assessed against other policies within this Plan.

5.175 Allotments and gardens provide a semi-natural habitat for local wildlife and corridors for the movement of wildlife in the urban area. Collectively, they help to mitigate fluvial and surface water flooding in the built-up parts of Brentwood. They form part of an area's development pattern, providing a setting for buildings. They are an important environmental resource and are a vital component of Brentwood's character.

5.176 However, it should also be noted that, some forms of redevelopment and infill development, which are well designed and make efficient use of land, will continue to be a valuable additional source of housing supply and need not be inappropriate.

5.177 For policies and guidance relating to garden and open space, applicants should refer to Policy HP06 Standards for New Housing, Policy BE23 Open Space, Community, Sport and Recreational Facilities as well as the Brentwood Town Centre Design Guide and Essex Design Guide.

(1)Open Space

5.178 Brentwood's existing sport, leisure, public and private open spaces are important valued assets serving communities and visitors.

(1)5.179 Access to good quality open space is essential for health and well-being. The ability to access local open space across the borough varies with a lack of provision in some areas. Provision within new development is therefore particularly important in areas where a deficiency has been identified or where new development would give rise to a deficiency.

5.180 The proportion of any site to be set aside (or the contribution to be made for off-site provision) will be assessed with regard to the extent, nature, quality and accessibility of existing provision, the suitability of the site and form of the proposed development.

5.181 On larger residential and/or commercial schemes of 50 units and above, the Council will seek at least 15% of the site to be set aside with substantive and usable public open space created. Useable open space is defined as 2000m² in a single mass, giving people a space to be able to play. Developments that are unable to provide 15% substantive and usable public open space will be required to provide an enhanced financial contribution to the creation and/or improvement to existing open space outside of the development site. Developments providing specialised accommodation for the elderly, such as sheltered housing, will be required to provide private amenity space as part of the site and may be required to provide a financial contribution to enhance or improve existing burial ground / service within the borough.

5.182 In some central urban locations site constraints may make new provision difficult, in which case a contribution towards providing or enhancing open space facilities in the borough will be required.

5.183 The Council will require a contribution towards the laying out, provision and future maintenance of play equipment, where open space is provided as part of the overall development. An Infrastructure Delivery Plan and CIL Charging Schedule, will provide further detail on arrangements for securing commuted payments and ongoing maintenance through planning obligations, in line with Policy PC14 Protecting and Enhancing Community Assets .

(1)5.184 Policy BE23 is concerned with ensuring good provision of high quality, accessible open space to meet the needs of the local community. Set entirely within the Metropolitan Green Belt, Brentwood has direct access, via the rights of way network, to extensive open areas for informal recreation. Country Parks including Hutton, South Weald and Thorndon provide 324 hectares of informal open space, together with other publicly accessible playing fields, parks, woodlands and wider sporting facilities. The Council aims to retain and enhance existing facilities unless a case can be made for alternative provision to be provided which is equivalent or better in terms of the type of open space, accessibility, quality and convenience.

5.185 All proposals, where appropriate, will be required to comply with the Council's open space standards as set out in Figure 5.4. These take account of recommendations in Open Space and Sports facilities evidence, Brentwood Play Pitch Strategy (2018), Brentwood Open Space Strategy (2008-2018) and Play Strategy (2018). With regard to children's play space, the Council will seek proposals which meet the Fields in Trust minimum standards as set out in Figure 5.5.

Outdoor Sport	3.15 ha per 1,000 population
Children's Playing Space	Between 0.13 – 0.17 ha per 1,000 population
Allotments and Community Gardens	0.18 per ha per 1,000 population

Figure 5.4: Open Space Standards

Local Area for Play (LAP)	Characteristics: The LAP is a small area of open space specifically designated and primarily laid out for very young children to play close to where they live. Aimed at children up to the age of 6.
	Walking distance: 100 m Minimum activity zone: 100 sqm Minimum buffer zone: 5 m
Local Equipped Area for Play (LEAP)	Characteristics: The LEAP is an area of open space specifically designated and laid out with features including equipment for children who are beginning to go out and play independently close to where they live.
	Walking distance: 400 m Minimum activity zone: 400 sqm Minimum buffer zone: 20 m
Neighbourhood Equipped Area for Play (NEAP)	Characteristics: The NEAP is an area of open space specifically designated, laid out and equipped mainly for older children but also with play opportunities for younger children.
	Walking distance: 1,000 m Minimum activity zone: 1,000 sqm comprising an area for play equipment and structures and a hard surfaced area of at least 465 sqm – the minimum needed to play five-a-side football) Minimum buffer zone: 30 m

Figure 5.5: Fields in Trust Children's Play Space Standards