020 West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane, West Horndon
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9191
Received: 08/04/2015
Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Our client is aware that BBC has suggested that approximately 250 dwellings could be constructed on Site 020 (the equivalent of 39 dwellings per hectare). However, on the basis that this site is located close to the settlement centre and its train station, our client considers that a greater density of development could be achieved in this location. We therefore respectfully request that Brentwood Council increase s the approximate density for this site to a minimum of 320 dwel lings (the equivalent of 50 dwellings per hectare).
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9192
Received: 08/04/2015
Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd
Agent: Barton Willmore
Our client fully support BBC's recognition that the Local Plan needs to be revisited following consultation on the POLP, notably that the proposed housing requirement has increased in the light of OAN. Our client's site has great potential to meet Brentwood Council's housing needs and help deliver socio -economic infrastructure improvements for the residents of West Horndon. The redevelopment of our client's site for residential -led mixed use purposes would also result in a reduction in heavy vehicle traffic and noise impact through the settlement , which has been identified by local residents as a high priority during the Council's public consultation exercise.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9194
Received: 08/04/2015
Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd
Agent: Barton Willmore
We therefore support Council's aspiration to encourage new residential-led mixed us development in West Horndon, particularly the redevelopment of the West Horndon Industrial Estate (Sites 020 & 021).
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9491
Received: 09/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Christopher Hart
The development of the Industrial Estates (020 and 021) being brownfield sites could be achieved in a positive manner for West Horndon village, although probably at a lower density than the 500 indicated in the 5 year land supply.
It should be noted however that development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and as such, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9652
Received: 13/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Carol Minter
O20 and O21 - Industrial Estates in W Horndon. 500 is excessive as it will increase the village size by about 90%. The current infrastructure would be totally inadequate to expand the village to this size.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10260
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: H. Watson
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon village (at a lower density than the 500 indicated in the 5 year land supply)
It should be noted that development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and as such, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately.
The present infrastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10392
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: S. Arkieson
The industrial estates in West Horndon 020 and 021 are already in the 5 year plan and are brownfield sites. There are other brownfield sites that could be developed around West Horndon giving u a lower figure than 400-500 homes. Elliots club is earmarked for 20 new homes. West Horndon has approx. 700+ homes and with 400-500 new homes our village will increase by 90%. Even with this amount we would need expansion of school, doctors, transport, shops, roads (ours are all small and virtually only lanes).
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10425
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jill Saddington
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are I believe brownfield sites and will hopefully be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon. This will increase the size of the village by 90%
037A, B and C, 038A and B and 126 are all Green Belt and would change the villagebeyond recognition. I strongly object to that. Let all the Brentwood vilalges take some pain and not just us.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10745
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Sue Lister
The areas 020 and 021 are brownfield industrial sites, which are already in the 5 year land supply. If 400-500 houses are built here, that will change West Horndon by about 80% increase in housing.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: No - The A127 is always busy and there are frequent roadworks. The A12 flows much better. The A127 is prone to flooding, which causes further delays.
Q3: Yes - The areas 020 and 021 are brownfield industrial sites, which are already in the 5 year land supply. If 400-500 houses are built here, that will change West Horndon by about 80% increase in housing. 037A, B and C, 038A and B and 126 are Green Belt. This would be inappropriate development and would cause environmental harm. These fields are frequently water logged and therefore prone to flooding.
Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb is preferred. It has a great deal of potential for growth, as although it is in our parish, it is outside the village. Robust buffer zones should be established however.
Q5: Yes - Brentwood should use the available sites for significant development in these areas. As previously stated, I believe there is more capacity on the A12 rather than the A127.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed, greenfield should not be developed, and should be regarded as sacrosanct.
Q7: Yes - Transport by bus from railway stations must be established.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes - We have a park in West Horndon. The potential development of the Dunton Harden Suburb should include more open spaces for us, as DSG will impact us.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 2
Q12: As previously stated, the A127 struggles now. No information seems to be available re C2C.
Q13: Health, education and transport are what I consider to be priorities. These must be established sooner, rather than later.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10841
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Smith
I agree with the use of the 2 industrial areas in West Horndon (the old rotary area and Brown & Tawse) although these also are in Green Belt, If relocated they become Brownfield sites.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11320
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Lukas Warren
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.
See attached representation.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11323
Received: 16/04/2015
Respondent: David and Lesley Peterson
I am agreeable to the development of the Industrial estates (020 & 021) within West Horndon providing that there is sufficient planning and infrastructure to manage the impact on the existing community.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11364
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Anthony Warren
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.
See attached representation.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11386
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Linda Warren
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.
See attached representation.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11754
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs. Margaret Thorpe
Yes. Building on industrial estate will improve village.
Q1: No. All areas with unused properties should be used first.
Q2: No to Dunton Garden Suburb.
Q3: Yes. Building on industrial estate will improve village.
Q4: Not on Green Belt.
Q5: Only if on brownfield sites.
Q6: Only brownfield sites.
Q7: No. A127 has already too much traffic on it.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 1
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. The flooding resultant of the building on fenland (flood plain).
Q13: Adequate bus services.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11785
Received: 20/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Doreen Worth
Sites 020 and 021 would be best suited to housing and office space given the proximity to the rail station, ignoring for the moment the fact that the rail line is currently at capacity.
They would not be suitable for a Gypsy and Traveller site because the travellers would have little or no requirement for a rail link so the advantage of sites 020 and 021 with their proximity to the rail station would be better used for other people who would rely heavily on the rail link.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11802
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mr and Mrs John and Linda Minch
Yes. 020 and 021 industrial estates in West Horndon are brownfield sites and in my opinion if we have to have extra housing, this would be the preferred option, rather than Green Belt land. But there would need to have schools, doctors and public transport to satisfy demand.
Q1: Yes. Splitting the Borough into three areas appears to make sense due to the different characteristics of these areas.
Q2: No. Road and rail infrastructure is overstretched. A127 at peak times is at a standstill and c2c is packed at peak times with no seats available, which will only get worse. Flood risk has not been assessed, we have flooding in Thorndon Avenue and roads around Dunton often flooded on slip road.
Q3: Yes. 020 and 021 industrial estates in West Horndon are brownfield sites and in my opinion if we have to have extra housing, this would be the preferred option, rather than Green Belt land. But there would need to have schools, doctors and public transport to satisfy demand.
Q4: Site 200 (Dunton Garden Suburb) is preferred to other sites as it would give a large number of housing in one location, although it would put a strain on surrounding road and rail networks.
Q5: Yes. Suitable sites should be included in the A12 Corridor to spread the impact on one area.
Q6: Where there are suitable brownfield sites these should be developed first as in West Horndon Industrial Park as it provides housing in a good location without damaging Green Belt land.
Q7: Yes. To relocate employment sites such as West Horndon Industrial Park it is important that it is within the A12 Corridor with good access to major road networks but ideally with access to public transport.
Q8: Yes. There does need to be local shops for villages but focus needs to be on Town Centres.
Q9: Yes. The park in Cadogan Avenue in West Horndon could be enhanced and expanded. If they build the Dunton Garden Suburb they could put in park areas.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. If the Dunton Garden Suburb gets the go ahead it would need a train station, otherwise the residents would drive to neighbouring stations at West Horndon or Laindon which would cause chaos at peak times, and Laindon would not have enough allocated parking in station car parks, and there would need to be better bus services.
Q13: Given the scale of development proposed in A127 Corridor it would need to be evenly spread between education, transport, healthcare, community facilities and green space.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12105
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Katharine Turner
020 and 021 (Industrial Estates in West Horndon) are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon village, (at a lower density than in the 5 year land supply.) Development of these sites could increase the residential size of West
Horndon village by 90%, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure
that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12198
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Maureen Craske
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12255
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Louise Hollamby-Craske
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12297
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Steven Morris
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12329
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12350
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12372
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12416
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Support redevelopment of existing employment sites at West Horndon (020 & 021), provides an opportunity for housing growth close to the existing railway station and nearby local facilities. Brentwood Enterprise Park [site ref 101A] can provide new employment floorspace options for displaced businesses. This will help reduce Green Belt impacts and ensure best use of previously developed land in line with national policy. Location proximity to M25 best meets employment demands and avoid distribution traffic travelling through residential areas.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12446
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Scott Cooper
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12512
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Louise Cooper
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12592
Received: 24/04/2015
Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd
Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited
The 'West Horndon Strategic Allocation' and the 'Dunton Garden Suburb' alternative must relate fully to the existing pattern of settlements, the hierarchy of centres and the available infrastructure identified in the Borough in order to be sustainable. In order to make the West Horndon allocation, or the Dunton Garden Suburb sustainable and viable (in accordance with all aspects of the NPPF definition of sustainable development) there would be a need for significant new social, community, transport, environmental and green infrastructure to be delivered which are costly requirements and will take some significant time to be provided and become fully established to the benefit of the future residents, with consequent implications for the timing of delivery of housing.
See attached questionnaire.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12891
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12913
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price
020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.
See attached