020 West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane, West Horndon

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 62

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9191

Received: 08/04/2015

Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Our client is aware that BBC has suggested that approximately 250 dwellings could be constructed on Site 020 (the equivalent of 39 dwellings per hectare). However, on the basis that this site is located close to the settlement centre and its train station, our client considers that a greater density of development could be achieved in this location. We therefore respectfully request that Brentwood Council increase s the approximate density for this site to a minimum of 320 dwel lings (the equivalent of 50 dwellings per hectare).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9192

Received: 08/04/2015

Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Our client fully support BBC's recognition that the Local Plan needs to be revisited following consultation on the POLP, notably that the proposed housing requirement has increased in the light of OAN. Our client's site has great potential to meet Brentwood Council's housing needs and help deliver socio -economic infrastructure improvements for the residents of West Horndon. The redevelopment of our client's site for residential -led mixed use purposes would also result in a reduction in heavy vehicle traffic and noise impact through the settlement , which has been identified by local residents as a high priority during the Council's public consultation exercise.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9194

Received: 08/04/2015

Respondent: Threadneedle Property Investments Ltd

Agent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

We therefore support Council's aspiration to encourage new residential-led mixed us development in West Horndon, particularly the redevelopment of the West Horndon Industrial Estate (Sites 020 & 021).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9491

Received: 09/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Christopher Hart

Representation Summary:

The development of the Industrial Estates (020 and 021) being brownfield sites could be achieved in a positive manner for West Horndon village, although probably at a lower density than the 500 indicated in the 5 year land supply.

It should be noted however that development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and as such, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9652

Received: 13/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Carol Minter

Representation Summary:

O20 and O21 - Industrial Estates in W Horndon. 500 is excessive as it will increase the village size by about 90%. The current infrastructure would be totally inadequate to expand the village to this size.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10260

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: H. Watson

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon village (at a lower density than the 500 indicated in the 5 year land supply)

It should be noted that development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and as such, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately.

The present infrastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10392

Received: 14/04/2015

Respondent: S. Arkieson

Representation Summary:

The industrial estates in West Horndon 020 and 021 are already in the 5 year plan and are brownfield sites. There are other brownfield sites that could be developed around West Horndon giving u a lower figure than 400-500 homes. Elliots club is earmarked for 20 new homes. West Horndon has approx. 700+ homes and with 400-500 new homes our village will increase by 90%. Even with this amount we would need expansion of school, doctors, transport, shops, roads (ours are all small and virtually only lanes).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10425

Received: 14/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jill Saddington

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are I believe brownfield sites and will hopefully be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon. This will increase the size of the village by 90%

037A, B and C, 038A and B and 126 are all Green Belt and would change the villagebeyond recognition. I strongly object to that. Let all the Brentwood vilalges take some pain and not just us.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10745

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Sue Lister

Representation Summary:

The areas 020 and 021 are brownfield industrial sites, which are already in the 5 year land supply. If 400-500 houses are built here, that will change West Horndon by about 80% increase in housing.

Full text:

Q1: Yes.

Q2: No - The A127 is always busy and there are frequent roadworks. The A12 flows much better. The A127 is prone to flooding, which causes further delays.

Q3: Yes - The areas 020 and 021 are brownfield industrial sites, which are already in the 5 year land supply. If 400-500 houses are built here, that will change West Horndon by about 80% increase in housing. 037A, B and C, 038A and B and 126 are Green Belt. This would be inappropriate development and would cause environmental harm. These fields are frequently water logged and therefore prone to flooding.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb is preferred. It has a great deal of potential for growth, as although it is in our parish, it is outside the village. Robust buffer zones should be established however.

Q5: Yes - Brentwood should use the available sites for significant development in these areas. As previously stated, I believe there is more capacity on the A12 rather than the A127.

Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed, greenfield should not be developed, and should be regarded as sacrosanct.

Q7: Yes - Transport by bus from railway stations must be established.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes - We have a park in West Horndon. The potential development of the Dunton Harden Suburb should include more open spaces for us, as DSG will impact us.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 2

Q12: As previously stated, the A127 struggles now. No information seems to be available re C2C.

Q13: Health, education and transport are what I consider to be priorities. These must be established sooner, rather than later.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10841

Received: 14/04/2015

Respondent: Mr David Smith

Representation Summary:

I agree with the use of the 2 industrial areas in West Horndon (the old rotary area and Brown & Tawse) although these also are in Green Belt, If relocated they become Brownfield sites.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11320

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Lukas Warren

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11323

Received: 16/04/2015

Respondent: David and Lesley Peterson

Representation Summary:

I am agreeable to the development of the Industrial estates (020 & 021) within West Horndon providing that there is sufficient planning and infrastructure to manage the impact on the existing community.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11364

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Anthony Warren

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11386

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Linda Warren

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11754

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs. Margaret Thorpe

Representation Summary:

Yes. Building on industrial estate will improve village.

Full text:

Q1: No. All areas with unused properties should be used first.

Q2: No to Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q3: Yes. Building on industrial estate will improve village.

Q4: Not on Green Belt.

Q5: Only if on brownfield sites.

Q6: Only brownfield sites.

Q7: No. A127 has already too much traffic on it.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 1

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. The flooding resultant of the building on fenland (flood plain).

Q13: Adequate bus services.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11785

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Doreen Worth

Representation Summary:

Sites 020 and 021 would be best suited to housing and office space given the proximity to the rail station, ignoring for the moment the fact that the rail line is currently at capacity.

They would not be suitable for a Gypsy and Traveller site because the travellers would have little or no requirement for a rail link so the advantage of sites 020 and 021 with their proximity to the rail station would be better used for other people who would rely heavily on the rail link.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11802

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr and Mrs John and Linda Minch

Representation Summary:

Yes. 020 and 021 industrial estates in West Horndon are brownfield sites and in my opinion if we have to have extra housing, this would be the preferred option, rather than Green Belt land. But there would need to have schools, doctors and public transport to satisfy demand.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. Splitting the Borough into three areas appears to make sense due to the different characteristics of these areas.

Q2: No. Road and rail infrastructure is overstretched. A127 at peak times is at a standstill and c2c is packed at peak times with no seats available, which will only get worse. Flood risk has not been assessed, we have flooding in Thorndon Avenue and roads around Dunton often flooded on slip road.

Q3: Yes. 020 and 021 industrial estates in West Horndon are brownfield sites and in my opinion if we have to have extra housing, this would be the preferred option, rather than Green Belt land. But there would need to have schools, doctors and public transport to satisfy demand.

Q4: Site 200 (Dunton Garden Suburb) is preferred to other sites as it would give a large number of housing in one location, although it would put a strain on surrounding road and rail networks.

Q5: Yes. Suitable sites should be included in the A12 Corridor to spread the impact on one area.

Q6: Where there are suitable brownfield sites these should be developed first as in West Horndon Industrial Park as it provides housing in a good location without damaging Green Belt land.

Q7: Yes. To relocate employment sites such as West Horndon Industrial Park it is important that it is within the A12 Corridor with good access to major road networks but ideally with access to public transport.

Q8: Yes. There does need to be local shops for villages but focus needs to be on Town Centres.

Q9: Yes. The park in Cadogan Avenue in West Horndon could be enhanced and expanded. If they build the Dunton Garden Suburb they could put in park areas.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. If the Dunton Garden Suburb gets the go ahead it would need a train station, otherwise the residents would drive to neighbouring stations at West Horndon or Laindon which would cause chaos at peak times, and Laindon would not have enough allocated parking in station car parks, and there would need to be better bus services.

Q13: Given the scale of development proposed in A127 Corridor it would need to be evenly spread between education, transport, healthcare, community facilities and green space.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12105

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Katharine Turner

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 (Industrial Estates in West Horndon) are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed in a positive manner for West Horndon village, (at a lower density than in the 5 year land supply.) Development of these sites could increase the residential size of West
Horndon village by 90%, sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure
that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12198

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Craske

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12255

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Louise Hollamby-Craske

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12297

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Steven Morris

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12329

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12350

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12372

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12416

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Support redevelopment of existing employment sites at West Horndon (020 & 021), provides an opportunity for housing growth close to the existing railway station and nearby local facilities. Brentwood Enterprise Park [site ref 101A] can provide new employment floorspace options for displaced businesses. This will help reduce Green Belt impacts and ensure best use of previously developed land in line with national policy. Location proximity to M25 best meets employment demands and avoid distribution traffic travelling through residential areas.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12446

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Scott Cooper

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12512

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Louise Cooper

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply, and are brownfield sites that could be developed positively for West Horndon village, at a lower density than indicated in the 5 year land supply. Development of these sites alone could increase the residential size of West Horndon village by c. 90% and sufficient planning and infrastructure will need to ensure that the impact to existing residents is managed appropriately. The present infrastructure (including roads, school and healthcare provision, and public transport) would be extremely inadequate in light of such expansion of the village.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12592

Received: 24/04/2015

Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd

Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited

Representation Summary:

The 'West Horndon Strategic Allocation' and the 'Dunton Garden Suburb' alternative must relate fully to the existing pattern of settlements, the hierarchy of centres and the available infrastructure identified in the Borough in order to be sustainable. In order to make the West Horndon allocation, or the Dunton Garden Suburb sustainable and viable (in accordance with all aspects of the NPPF definition of sustainable development) there would be a need for significant new social, community, transport, environmental and green infrastructure to be delivered which are costly requirements and will take some significant time to be provided and become fully established to the benefit of the future residents, with consequent implications for the timing of delivery of housing.

Full text:

See attached questionnaire.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12891

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12913

Received: 05/05/2015

Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price

Representation Summary:

020 and 021 are already in the 5 year land supply and are brownfield sites that could be developed. If the proposed 500 dwellings were to go ahead this could almost double the size of West Horndon village and would require major improvements to the infrastructure, including, roads, school, health care and public transport, as the current infrastructure would be inadequate to cope with the proposed new dwellings.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: