Question 12
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8450
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Reece Smith
Yes. Due to many people I know have children that attend Blackmore School but cannot live in the village, I believe there should be more variety and opportunities for homes here.
Q1: Yes, I agree in the participation of any housing properties built into the villages.
Q2: Yes. I agree that more homes/properties need to be built in Blackmore as more families want to live here but cannot due to limited council homes.
Q3: Yes, I am interested in any properties in Blackmore due to family and friends living here.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Yes. I agree with any housing taking place on greenfield and brownfield.
Q7: Yes.
Q9: Yes, I believe there are; Fingrith Hall Road linking Orchard Piece and Red Rose Lane linking to Woollard Way located in Blackmore village.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. Due to many people I know have children that attend Blackmore School but cannot live in the village, I believe there should be more variety and opportunities for homes here.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8471
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Thereasa Marsden
Yes. Taken into account there should be more housing offering families more choice, that have a great need for the area.
Q1: Yes. I do agree for building in Blackmore.
Q2: Yes. I know there are families that have a great to move into Blackmore.
Q3: Yes, I have an interest in building to go to Blackmore.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Yes, if there is areas on the outside of Blackmore village for development, I do support it.
Q7: Yes.
Q9: None that I know of.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: -
Infrastructure: -
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. Taken into account there should be more housing offering families more choice, that have a great need for the area.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8488
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Marion Nicol
Yes.
Q1: No.
Q2: No.
Q3: No.
Q4: None.
Q5: No.
Q6: Neither.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8504
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Malcolm and Wendy Watson
Number of people: 2
Yes. The infrastructure, i.e. roads, school capacity, extra stopping trains, more doctors surgeries, to mention a few, needs to be completed or started and though about first before anything else.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: No. Traffic on A127 at capacity (during rush hour extremely busy). There is not much room for expansion on A127, but the A12 could provide more room for widening. The flooding issue is a priority for improvement.
Q3: Yes. Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane] - industrial sites seem to be the only appropriate areas for development. The greenfield sites are not appropriate. We who live in this village (us for 46 years) want a village environment to remain.
Q4: Site 200 [Land East of A128, South of A127]
Sites 020 [West Horndon Industrial Estate, Childerditch Lane] and 021 [Horndon Industrial Estate, Station Lane]
Consider the clay soil re flooding.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites. Developing greenfield sites around West Horndon would be detrimental in so many ways.
Q7: Yes. Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses.
Q8: Yes. See comment above re buses [Rep ID 8495: "Public transport will possibly be required to a greater extent than now - especially buses."]
Q9: Yes. Improvement on recreational field/park in Cadogan Avenue. If the school needs enlargement there is scope in the small area adjacent to the school behind the houses in Cadogan Avenue and Thorndon Avenue.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4
Other - Sense of community: 4
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. The infrastructure, i.e. roads, school capacity, extra stopping trains, more doctors surgeries, to mention a few, needs to be completed or started and though about first before anything else.
Q13: All community facilities should be prioritised. This is an all or nothing situation. Will this have an impact on Council Tax?
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8528
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Raymond Pascoe
No.
Q1: No.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes - The use of Green Belt / agricultural land for building homes / commercial buildings is strongly opposed.
Q4: Not on Green Belt land.
Q5: No.
Q6: Brownfield sites only.
Q7: No - Not if on greenfield site.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 2
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: No.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8549
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Alfred Larney
Yes.
Q1: No - Blackmore will lose its identity as a village.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes - Necessary to retain the Green Belt and farm land.
Q5: No.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: Yes.
Q13: No further infrastructure. Narrow road could not cope with extra traffic. Plus limited transport. None on Sundays. Extra cars on road. With 130 homes = approx 400 people possibly 260 more cars. We moved here from Central London to enjoy village atmosphere in retirement.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8552
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Anthony Harvey
Yes.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes. Blackmore is not suitable for any development with the facilities that are already here, school etc. The A127 Corridor has far more potential.
Q4: A127 Corridor, Dunton Garden Suburb would seem to be the best option.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: As far as villages are concerned, no greenfield sites should be developed only brownfield.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. Protect the High Streets.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: Yes.
Q13: State of footpaths in Blackmore are an absolute disgrace.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8562
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: C Owers
Yes.
Q1: Not within the Green Belt.
Q6: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8581
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Sophie Hewitt
No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.
Q1: No. No building on Green Belt. I want to live in a village.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are local.
Q4: No capacity for growth on A127.
Q5: Yes. Not on Green Belt.
Q6: Far in excess of local need.
Q7: No. Not enough adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.
Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8594
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Jonathan Hewitt
No.
Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on current Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are for local need.
Q4: The A127 has no capacity for growth.
Q5: Yes, as long as it is not on Green Belt. I object to building on Green Belt.
Q6: This is not for local need, this is national need.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: No.
Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8597
Received: 31/03/2015
Respondent: Allyson Sorrell
The juctions are already at full tilt and this means the A127 and A12 will just get worse.
Local hospitals, schools and doctors are already struggling to cope currently.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8609
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Alan Dodd
Without detail of each planned development is not yet possible to give a definitive answer. Infrastructure seldom seems up with development.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8623
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanne Marrs
To many issues for Blackmore village to cope with.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8637
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: S Hollam
Yes.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8640
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Miss Toni Cope
As well as being densely populated, the traffic on the A128 between the A127 and Brentwood is already a disaster at peak times.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8649
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Miss Toni Cope
Impact on roads, network rail, schools, doctors, hospitals - additional homes on Green Belt / Brownbelt sites affects it all.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8660
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Hazel Town
We need to keep England a green and pleasant land.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8673
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Isabel Acombar
Yes. Trains on C2C are already packed at rush hour. New Cross Rail should be No. 1 priority in making full use. A127 near max capacity unless major development proposed.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8685
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Ron Beazley
Ideally keep the countryside as it is for visitors and locals to enjoy.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8698
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Barry
Yes. The current infrastructure is to capacity for the Ingrave/Herongate area. Any further development would push the already limited facilities to breaking point.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8711
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Danny Barry
The infrastructure is already to capacity for Ingrave/Herongate area. Any further development would push the already limited resources to breaking point.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8724
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Bradley Thurgood
The Herongate/Ingrave area could not accommodate any more resident. Road, rail (which is absent) an schools are limited. Roads consistently jammed in rush hour.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8737
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Alison Thurgood
For Ingrave/ Herongate we are already to capacity. With the A128 and no rail link / public transport at all for residents. There is only one school and a small park shared with the school. No doctors etc.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8761
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Carol Hewitt
No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.
Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on what is currently Green Belt - I chose to live in a village.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites are appropriate providing they are for local need.
Q4: There is no capacity for growth on A127. It's always rammed with congestion.
Q5: Yes. Providing it's not on Green Belt.
Q6: This is far in excess of requirements for local need.
Q7: No. You do not have adequate infrastructure for extra traffic.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: No. Appropriate infrastructure for growth, i.e. doctors, schools, playschools etc.
Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8762
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Karen Higgin
The Green Belt was created for a purpose & it should be preserved for future generations.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8786
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Janice Perkins
Space away from towns/ work etc to relax and breathe. Also for others visiting from outer London boroughs.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8789
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Captain Peter Hewitt
No. Why go for the easy option - Green Belt - our villages and home.
Q1: No. Build on Brown Belt sites. I object to building on our Green Belt land.
Q2: No. Do not build on Green Belt.
Q3: Yes. You will destroy our village life. This is Green Belt land - not building land.
Q4: The A127 is already passed capacity and cannot except anymore.
Q5: Yes, providing it is not on Green Belt land.
Q6: We do not need anymore properties in our villages.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: No. Why go for the easy option - Green Belt - our villages and home.
Q13: Herongate and Ingrave do not need any new infrastructure.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8802
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Russell Butler
Green Belt was introduced for a reason.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8820
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sally-Anne Backhouse-Jaques
Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.
Q1: No. I strongly object to any proposal to build on Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. It is ok to build on old factory sites if this is necessary and they are derelict. There is no need to build on Green Belt. Green Belt is Green Belt.
Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127. Building more houses will create even more gridlock.
Q5: No. The gridlock will still be there. Do you not research surrounding areas / traffic?
Q6: 80% of growth according to Brentwood Council will be from people who currently live outside Brentwood. There is no local need for this ridiculous amount of houses.
Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of employment and there is plenty of infrastructure existing for expansion.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.
Q13: Maintaining existing infrastructure and improving public access to Green Belt.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8828
Received: 01/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Pauline Butler
Green Belt is important for residents and visitors alike. A space to breather from our towns and cities. A place for wildlife.
See attached.