Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8820
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sally-Anne Backhouse-Jaques
Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.
Q1: No. I strongly object to any proposal to build on Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. It is ok to build on old factory sites if this is necessary and they are derelict. There is no need to build on Green Belt. Green Belt is Green Belt.
Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127. Building more houses will create even more gridlock.
Q5: No. The gridlock will still be there. Do you not research surrounding areas / traffic?
Q6: 80% of growth according to Brentwood Council will be from people who currently live outside Brentwood. There is no local need for this ridiculous amount of houses.
Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of employment and there is plenty of infrastructure existing for expansion.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes. Infrastructure should be considered for the North of England where there is massive scope for expansion, Brentwood is at full capacity.
Q13: Maintaining existing infrastructure and improving public access to Green Belt.