Question 10
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7006
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Anderson
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3
(Other) Button Common 5
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7017
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanne Gill
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use : 5
Wildlife Interst : 5
Historic Interest : 4
Tranquility : 5
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7031
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Freeman
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
(Other) -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7047
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Holbrook
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7063
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs A. Small
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7093
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Stiles
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
(Other) -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7113
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Trevor Zucconi
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
(Other) -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7137
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr. Norman Russell
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
(Other) -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7144
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola McNicol
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Other - Safe neighbourhood/community: 5
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7185
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Stephen Allpress
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community Spirit: 5
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7217
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Frank Last
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes
Q3: Yes. Green Belt land should not be considered for development.
Q4: Any site that is considered for development should be looked at carefully as once it is built on it is lost as green space forever.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed first. We must not keep losing greenfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes.
Q13: The repairing and maintenance of our existing road and keeping the Borough clean and tidy.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7230
Received: 06/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Seems wrong to force on villages in Green Belt that struggle to cope with road, transport, communications as it currently stands.
Q4: Seems more logical to go where the capacity for growth in one area rather than several areas thus causing less disruption.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Development of brownfield sites is preferable.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.
Q9: No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. Blackmore seems to accommodate barely its present requirements. Transport is rubbish.
Q13: Along the A127 or the A12.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7243
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Owen
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other: Community 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7257
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7277
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Deidre Belton
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q1: No. I strongly object to any building on our countryside.
Q2: Neither. Do not know the issues raised in some areas.
Do not develop around Ingrave & Herongate.
Q3: Don't know. Leave Ingrave & Herongate out of the equation.
Q4: Anywhere but Ingrave & Herongate.
Q5: No. Leave our countryside alone.
Q6: Develop on brownfield sites only so long as it does not affect Ingrave & Herongate countryside.
Q7: No.
Q8: Don't know what this means.
Q9: No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: It is difficult enough to obtain doctors appointments and other care facilities in this area without anymore rebuild.
Q13: No comment.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7289
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Savill
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU businesses for profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial areas.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7301
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: MR Richard Savill
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU business' for pure profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial area.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs?
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7310
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Helena Penkul
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4
Other: Village community: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7322
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Harrington
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7337
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr George Hand
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 4
Please see attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7350
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lawrence Harrington
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7360
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
The consultation document refers to fenland landscapes and also implies that the A127 has greater development potential due to it having a "different landscape character". The inference seems to be that the landscape is less attractive than elsewhere in the Borough. Whilst it does indeed have a different landscape character to the North of the Borough, the local residents' value of the open space and farmland should not be considered any lower than residents of the North of the Borough. The open, fenland landscape is valued extremely highly by local residents, and contributes to an open rural feel to this area and local settlements.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7370
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other: Quality of architecture 4
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7383
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7399
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7429
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7450
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
(Other) -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7461
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Jennie Penkul
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 3
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7484
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr James Carpenter
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7499
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Beverley Graves
Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 4
See attached document