Question 9
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 6960
Received: 10/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Moss
No. Other than if the unsuitable sites suggested for development were earmarked instead for open space provision rather than development.
I have tried to find the necessary questionnaire about the above mentioned subject but have been unable to access it. I wish to object most strongly to the proposals for a number of reasons, not least of which is that neither Lime Grove nor Peartree Lane are suitable for increased vehicular traffic either during or post development. This is a ridiculous proposal obviously put forward by and supported by those who have either no knowledge of the area or selfish interests or both. I wish to register my objections.
[Email: See attached]
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 6989
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Kay Turner
There is a good provision of open space in my area and within the locality.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7003
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Anderson
Yes.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7016
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanne Gill
No.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7030
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Freeman
Yes.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7046
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Holbrook
No. In the immediate vicinity there is a high proportion of open space as it is a village in the middle of a farming area.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7059
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs A. Small
Yes. West Horndon's park would benefit from enhancements.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7092
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Stiles
No.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7098
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Alan Smith
No The area is mosty surrounded by farms
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7111
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Trevor Zucconi
Development of the local park area and furhter Land to the East, West and South [of West Horndon].
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7136
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr. Norman Russell
No.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7143
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola McNicol
Yes. West Horndon village currently benefits from a small community park on Cadogan Avenue. As part of any potential future development within the village (and indeed, the Dunton Garden Suburb), there are significant opportunities to enhance this park, both from a facilities and access
perspective.The green belt was created to permanently protect area like Brentwood from urban sprawl. It
should be preserved and only enhanced to define new nature reserves protect wildlife effectively.Wildlife habitats that are protected by law can be found on all green belt land not just those designated as conservation areas or sites of special scientific interest. Any possibility of
development on green belt or other open spaces needs to be proceeded by a detailed environmental impact assessment
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7172
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Stephen Allpress
West Horndon village currently benefits from a small community park on
Cadogan Avenue. As part of any potential future development within the village
(and indeed, the Dunton Garden Suburb), there are significant opportunities to
enhance this park, both from a facilities and access perspective.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7216
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Frank Last
Yes.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes
Q3: Yes. Green Belt land should not be considered for development.
Q4: Any site that is considered for development should be looked at carefully as once it is built on it is lost as green space forever.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed first. We must not keep losing greenfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes.
Q13: The repairing and maintenance of our existing road and keeping the Borough clean and tidy.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7229
Received: 06/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch
No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Seems wrong to force on villages in Green Belt that struggle to cope with road, transport, communications as it currently stands.
Q4: Seems more logical to go where the capacity for growth in one area rather than several areas thus causing less disruption.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Development of brownfield sites is preferable.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.
Q9: No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. Blackmore seems to accommodate barely its present requirements. Transport is rubbish.
Q13: Along the A127 or the A12.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7242
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Owen
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7256
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7276
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Deidre Belton
No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.
Q1: No. I strongly object to any building on our countryside.
Q2: Neither. Do not know the issues raised in some areas.
Do not develop around Ingrave & Herongate.
Q3: Don't know. Leave Ingrave & Herongate out of the equation.
Q4: Anywhere but Ingrave & Herongate.
Q5: No. Leave our countryside alone.
Q6: Develop on brownfield sites only so long as it does not affect Ingrave & Herongate countryside.
Q7: No.
Q8: Don't know what this means.
Q9: No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: It is difficult enough to obtain doctors appointments and other care facilities in this area without anymore rebuild.
Q13: No comment.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7288
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Savill
No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU businesses for profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial areas.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7300
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: MR Richard Savill
No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU business' for pure profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial area.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs?
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7309
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Helena Penkul
If you create a development as large as this proposal, there must be areas left as open and natural land. It is beautiful as it is.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7321
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Harrington
If the plan is to use green belt but if the country is to be protected there isn't any space.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7335
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr George Hand
No comment made
Please see attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7349
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lawrence Harrington
We must protect our green belt
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7369
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington
If the plan is to use greenbelt but if the country's ecosystem is to be protected then there isn't any space.
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7382
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7398
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7428
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
But please keep our rural village aspect by retaining our surrounding farmland.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7444
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
Yes. West Horndon village currently benefits from a small community park on Cadogan Avenue. As part of any potential future development within the village (and indeed, the Dunton Garden Suburb), there are significant opportunities to enhance this park, both from a facilities and access perspective.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7446
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
As part of any potential future development, the Dunton Garden Suburb, there are significant opportunities.
See attached.