Question 9

Showing comments and forms 451 to 480 of 530

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11654

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: K. Steel

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11655

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: V. Chars

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11656

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs K.A. Lagdon

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11657

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: D. Leireleir

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11658

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Dunn

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11659

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: D. R. Copeman

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11660

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Deborah Wilson

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11661

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: G. B. Wilson

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11662

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: G Holdgate

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11663

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Sharon Dymond

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11664

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Pat Guntrip

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11665

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Peter Guntrip

Representation Summary:

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, please consider extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Full text:

I understand that you and your fellow councillors together with senior officers are in the process of reviewing the Borough's Local Plan.

You have invited residents to contribute to this consultation process which I know is much appreciated by my fellow residents.

As you will know all we have by way of Public Open Space here in Shenfield is the Courage's playing field, which during the summer months is taken over most weekends by Shenfield Cricket club leaving our children and grandchildren with a very small play area.

Shenfield has a serious lack of Public open space, so, when your officers are considering their plans, can residents in Shenfield be taken into consideration and serious thought given to expanding what little space we have by extending the Courage's playing fields. This will alleviate the existing pressure and address any further shortfall if you are minded to allow substantial residential development to proceed.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11684

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Blanche Dust

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. My main concern is that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on households that border their land.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave

Q4: West Horndon.

Q5: Don't know.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes.

Q13: Schools, healthcare.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11704

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Dust

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. I am concerned that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on properties that border their land.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave

Q4: West Horndon.

Q5: Don't know.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes.

Q13: Schools, healthcare.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11727

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Graham Cooper

Representation Summary:

No. Other than farmland there is not much open space left, that would be suitable.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. I understand the need for growth, but any considered areas must take local resident views into account. Infrastructure must be one of the most important points, and what impact will development bring.

Q2: Yes. Any Local Plan must take all aspects into account with all residents views taken into account to have a good outcome.

Q3: Yes. When reading the consultations regarding the Brentwood Strategic Growth Options, it would appear to me that the most suitable options would be the Dunton Garden Suburb as the existing travel links are already in place.

Q4: As stated above [see Rep ID 11719] Dunton Garden Suburb would be most suitable. Very good travel links, which would help travel.

Q5: Yes. Only after all other options have been considered.

Q6: Brownfield sites would be better.

Q7: Yes. That's why Dunton Garden is a good plan.

Q8: Yes. The Town Centre should remain sustainable and improvements made.

Q9: No. Other than farmland there is not much open space left, that would be suitable.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Other - Peace: 5

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes.

Q13: Suitable housing with good transport links.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11746

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Thomas Lennon

Representation Summary:

No this area is semi rural, there are two large playing fields with children's play areas and one small field with children's playground. To provide further open spaces would mean intrusion into the Green Belt areas. [Hook End].

Full text:

Q1: Yes. All areas have separate issues to be considered.

Q2: Yes. 1) Social housing would be beneficial to allow growth in the villages, in particular brownfield sites. 2) A new bypass is essential to ensure increased traffic is diverted and not interrupt progress in the Town Centre. 3) This area offers the best option for housing and road networks.

Q3: Yes. Housing in these areas should be sympathetic to the local neighbourhoods.

Q4: The A127 Corridor offers the best opportunities for growth and development.

Q5: No. There appears to be enough scope for development alone for housing or new business interests to bring employment growth into the area.

Q6: No. In an ideal world it would be preferable to develop brownfield sites before intruding onto greenfield sites.

Q7: Yes. It is imperative that new sites sit in isolation and are served by separate networks in order not to intrude into housing development.

Q8: Yes. It is important that a Town Centre First approach is taken to improve retail development in order to promote growth in employment.

Q9: No this area is semi rural, there are two large playing fields with children's play areas and one small field with children's playground. To provide further open spaces would mean intrusion into the Green Belt areas.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4
Other - Public Footpaths: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Public Footpaths: 4

Q12: Yes. New and much improved broadband connection would be a considerable asset.

Q13: This would be expensive (any figure, not known) but necessary.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11760

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs. Margaret Thorpe

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: No. All areas with unused properties should be used first.

Q2: No to Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q3: Yes. Building on industrial estate will improve village.

Q4: Not on Green Belt.

Q5: Only if on brownfield sites.

Q6: Only brownfield sites.

Q7: No. A127 has already too much traffic on it.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 2
Tranquility: 1

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. The flooding resultant of the building on fenland (flood plain).

Q13: Adequate bus services.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11775

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Donald Mackenzie

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. Doddinghurst does not have the infrastructure to support further development. Small school, shop car park already overflowing, narrow twisting roads in and out of village. The suggested development would substantially dilute the quality of life in this rural community.

Q5: No.

Q6: Brownfield sites should be given priority.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No.

Q13: To build new homes adjacent to easily accessible amenities such as shops and restaurants.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11811

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mr and Mrs John and Linda Minch

Representation Summary:

Yes. The park in Cadogan Avenue in West Horndon could be enhanced and expanded. If they build the Dunton Garden Suburb they could put in park areas.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. Splitting the Borough into three areas appears to make sense due to the different characteristics of these areas.

Q2: No. Road and rail infrastructure is overstretched. A127 at peak times is at a standstill and c2c is packed at peak times with no seats available, which will only get worse. Flood risk has not been assessed, we have flooding in Thorndon Avenue and roads around Dunton often flooded on slip road.

Q3: Yes. 020 and 021 industrial estates in West Horndon are brownfield sites and in my opinion if we have to have extra housing, this would be the preferred option, rather than Green Belt land. But there would need to have schools, doctors and public transport to satisfy demand.

Q4: Site 200 (Dunton Garden Suburb) is preferred to other sites as it would give a large number of housing in one location, although it would put a strain on surrounding road and rail networks.

Q5: Yes. Suitable sites should be included in the A12 Corridor to spread the impact on one area.

Q6: Where there are suitable brownfield sites these should be developed first as in West Horndon Industrial Park as it provides housing in a good location without damaging Green Belt land.

Q7: Yes. To relocate employment sites such as West Horndon Industrial Park it is important that it is within the A12 Corridor with good access to major road networks but ideally with access to public transport.

Q8: Yes. There does need to be local shops for villages but focus needs to be on Town Centres.

Q9: Yes. The park in Cadogan Avenue in West Horndon could be enhanced and expanded. If they build the Dunton Garden Suburb they could put in park areas.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. If the Dunton Garden Suburb gets the go ahead it would need a train station, otherwise the residents would drive to neighbouring stations at West Horndon or Laindon which would cause chaos at peak times, and Laindon would not have enough allocated parking in station car parks, and there would need to be better bus services.

Q13: Given the scale of development proposed in A127 Corridor it would need to be evenly spread between education, transport, healthcare, community facilities and green space.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11824

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mrs Doreen Worth

Representation Summary:

No. The surrounding Green Belt provides the desired open space.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11825

Received: 15/02/2015

Respondent: CEG Land Promotions Limited

Agent: CODE Development Planners Ltd

Representation Summary:

Opportunities for more open space provision within the Borough are often limited by the availability of land and funding. With reference to the A127 corridor there is no doubt there remains a need for additional open space and public access to the countryside. Development of a large scale form of development as illustrated in Appendix A affords a genuine opportunity, not available in smaller allocations, to make a substantial improvement to the availability of open space and public access, one of the guiding principles of garden city development..Dunton would delivery the improvements and enhancements to biodiversity habitats. In order to be found 'sound' the Local Plan will need to demonstrate how it delivers the enhancements to public access and biodiversity in the greenbelt in line with the NPPF:

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11847

Received: 12/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs M Craddock

Representation Summary:

Not sure.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. The character of the areas is completely different.

Q2: No. A127 at full capacity - widening could cause massive problems for local residents. Flooding, already a recurring problem, does not seem to have been addressed. Open fenland, with its wildlife and beauty, is greatly valued by residents of West Horndon.

Q3: Site 200 [Entire Land East of A128, south of A127] massively preferred to 037 [A/B/C - Land West of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon], 038 [A/B - Land East of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon], and 126 [Land East of West Horndon, South of Station Road].
Brownfield sites should be used for future building before exploiting greenfield sites.
New, appropriate infrastructure should be carefully planned before any building takes place.
My concern is that West Horndon will no longer be a village, its character treasured by local residents.

Q4: Site 200 has the greater potential to afford future benefit for the village of West Horndon.
Development unsuitable in sites 037 A,B,C [Land West of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon] and 038 A,B [Land East of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon] which are prone to becoming water logged - please refer to paragraph 100 of the National Planning Policy Framework.

Q5: Yes. Sustainable development in the Borough of Brentwood should be sought in all areas of the Borough, and especially along the A12 Corridor, to address the projected level of housing needs.

Q6: Brownfield sites are preferable for development of housing. Greenfield sites should only be used when distinct levels of benefit to the existing area are proved.

Q7: Yes. Employment opportunities are a must, and accessible by road, rail and public transport (including buses).

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Not sure.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Other - Flooding Prevention: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes. Travel links to surrounding areas/communities.

Q13: An holistic infrastructure Plan must be delivered to ensure development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11852

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Elodie Powell

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11870

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Ian Drake

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11875

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr John Warner

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. A12 and A127 should be promoted.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. It is not appropriate to develop sites 76 [Land south of Redrose Lane, north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore], 77 [Land south of Redrose Lane, north of Woollard Way, Blackmore], 199 [Land to the East of Ingatestone Road, Blackmore], 202 [Land to the South of Blackmore, off Blackmore Road] and 203 [Land to the West of Blackmore, off Blackmore Road] as this is a conservation area and within the Green Belt.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Brownfield sites must be developed in preference to green sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. Promote Town Centres as this reduces traffic.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - A Tourist Attraction: -

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Historic Buildings including Church: 2

Q12: No.

Q13: Health provision.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11917

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Karen Powell

Representation Summary:

Yes. Closer to the Ongar and Brentwood road, Kelvedon Hatch and Pilgrims Hatch

Full text:

see attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11930

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Robinson

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11951

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs N. Blake

Representation Summary:

No. However the County Council could do much more to designate "quite" lanes and cycleways as narrow country lanes with HGV traffic. It would be relatively easy to close many of the one track minor roads to HGV through traffic to make these route safer for walkers and cyclists.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11964

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Lafferty

Representation Summary:

Priority is to preserve what we have already.

Full text:

see attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11978

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Webb

Representation Summary:

Yes. Blackmore is surrrounded by fields and Green Belt and has some Playing Fields and Woods etc whch are free to access. Having come from a town - I miss the organsised Parks (eg St George's) with variety of activities. There is room for that kind of provision here too (Country Park in the vicinity).

Full text:

see attached

Attachments: