Question 7
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12688
Received: 24/04/2015
Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd
Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited
The SGO sets out the approach for employment site options, identifying the need for up additional employment land. This need requires a balanced approach to the consideration of employment site locations and options. This analysis is complex and nuanced and should consider a wider set of criteria than identifying locations close to the strategic highway network. (Refer to Paragraph 016, NPPF). In practice employment sites should be in proximity to established and future working population and accessible by a range of transport.Indeed, such an approach would underplay the economic potential of Crossrail that will significantly enhance the accessibility of Brentwood town and Shenfield to centres of employment outside the Borough in a wider functional economic market area and also enhance the opportunities for business to attract a skilled labour force from within the Borough and from elsewhere.
See attached questionnaire.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12689
Received: 24/04/2015
Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd
Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited
there will be a range of employment needs arising (in terms of the location, size and nature of employment sites/floorspace) from different economic sectors and occupiers that in turn have diverse requirements for B Use Class floorspace. Access to the strategic highway network may, or may not, be a priority for different sectors and occupiers. The SGO identifies the diversity of employment site requirements but need to more fully substantiate the conclusion drawn that locations close to the strategic highway network are most appropriate because "they meet modern business needs".
See attached questionnaire.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12690
Received: 24/04/2015
Respondent: Barwood Land and Estates Ltd
Agent: Chilmark Consulting Limited
The approach of allocating new employment sites predominantly on strategic highway networks should be properly considered against the requirements of the NPPF at paragraph 37 aiming to create a balance of land uses in order to minimise journey lengths for employment; and paragraph 38 with respect to encouraging the promotion of a mix of uses, including work on-site for larger scale residential developments.
See attached questionnaire.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12720
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Borough has unmet employment need, partly due to new homes requiring new jobs. The Economic Futures report (2014) sets out three scenarios, the highest (including replacement of existing employment land losses) requires 37.35 and 41.65 hectares of new employment land. This should be higher if more existing employment sites are re-allocated. The report sets out that majority of job growth is expected to be office-based.
Strategy should focus employment development in and around primary urban areas; more sustainable and accessible with reduced trip lengths, in accordance with NPPF.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12754
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanna Durrell
No.
Q1: Do not build on green land.
Q2: No. Please let small villages remain part of English heritage and not overpopulate them.
Q3: Yes, leave the Green Belt alone. Do not build on Green Belt.
Q4: I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?
Q5: No. I don't want to live in a London Borough. I like that we are a small town and have a community feel.
Q6: No.
Q7: No.
Q8: Retail is a key part of our community. Not big supermarkets and department stores.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes. The new port at Tilbury and the impact our village will have if the M25 and A130 fails to work. A128 will be used as a cut through to bypass the roads. Pollution and safety has not been addressed.
Q13: Ensuring our roads are safe and well maintained including pavements.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12768
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Copps
Yes.
Q1: No. This is mainly Green Belt plus fields. Please let there be some open spaces in Brentwood.
Q2: No. The infrastructure and facilities and local services are already stretched to the max.
Q3: No.
Q4: None. Find somewhere else.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Do not touch Green Belt.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: No.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Being a village which are slowly being lost in England: 5
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: No.
Q13: Making existing roads more roadworthy. Dealing with speed limits, especially on A128 which can be very dangerous. More buses and school buses to encourage more use.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12783
Received: 29/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Edna Connaway
This essential as it will also build traffic in these areas, and must have existing transport links.
See attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12800
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: John E Rolfe
No. All highways in this area are already over capacity!!!
See attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12812
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Wood
No.
See attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12846
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers
No.
Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.
Q4: Not sure.
Q5: No.
Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4
Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.
Q13: Don't know.
These questions are very biased and vague.
I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12862
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes
Yes. Ultimately the bulk of commuter traffic will use the highway network.
If new sites are created at some distance from these highways, then all of that traffic will add to congestion and polution on the routes for all of that extra distance onto the highways.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12879
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd
No.
Q1: No
Q2: No
Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.
Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.
Q5: No.
Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.
Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12904
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban
With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12926
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price
With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12938
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry
Yes
See attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12951
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ronan Hart
No
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12967
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Hermes Fund Managers Limited
Agent: McGough Planning Consultants
A significant reason for the decline of the industrial estates in West Horndon is the relatively poor road links to the strategic highway network. However, our traffic experts suggest local roads within and around West Horndon are adequately suited to the car traffic from a residential reuse of the estates; that would replace the industrial estates' commercial traffic in the event of redevelopment.
Hermes considers employment sites situated close to the strategic highway network would be successful and would encourage Brentwood to bring forward new employment sites in these locations.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13017
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker
Yes
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13030
Received: 08/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith
Yes you have to have good infrastructure , connections could easily be built at Dunton.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13060
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Wooldridge
Yes.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13071
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joan McCready
No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
Q1: This entire exercise is pathetic when shipyards, coalmines and factories were closed down there was a need for an excercise such as this in those locations.
Q2: See my husbands answers.
2 yes by all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
3 One who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on an y individual site.
5, No - the previous answers deal with this.
6 No, no, no.
7. No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
10
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
11
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2
8 Yes - But no more supermarkets.
9 Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use ot for leisure.
4 None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
12 No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
13 The previous answers deal with this.
1.14 Consultations. For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace.While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.