Question 7

Showing comments and forms 511 to 540 of 561

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12051

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Latham

Representation Summary:

Yes

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12061

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Butler

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. A12 and A127 Corridors should be encouraged and not North due to lack of infrastructure.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes. Blackmore is in a conservation area and within the Green Belt. Sites 076, 077, 199, 202 and 203. So are not suitable.

Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: In borough villages, if land needs to be released at all, then brownfield sites should be used.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. Reduce traffic by promoting town centres.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Tourist Attraction: 2

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Historic Buildings including Church & Priory: 2

Q12: No.

Q13: Health provisions.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12072

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Glenda Fleming

Representation Summary:

No. This is based on a presumption of continued expansion of commuting by car & road freight transport and will require major new road improvements.
Rail, walking and cycling routes should be encouraged.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12084

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Legg

Representation Summary:

Yes. Employment needs will be more important in the future as it will not viable to commute more and more people further and further distances to work.

Full text:

see attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12095

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Keith Godbee

Representation Summary:

Yes. Given the fact that a large number of Brentwood reseidents work in London
any development needs to be supported by road/rail facilities.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12118

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Katharine Turner

Representation Summary:

With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12142

Received: 22/04/2015

Respondent: S J & C M Norris

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Yes, this approach is strongly supported. In this regard site 157 (land adjacent to the A12 and A1023) provides a sound location for employment land with associated park and ride. It benefits from direct access onto the A12 and good links with Shenfield Train Station and Brentwood Town Centre. Allocating part of this land for employment, along with a park and ride provides for a very sustainable location for employment facilities. It will also have the potential to be of significant benefit in alleviating congestion within Shenfield and Brentwood.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12149

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Tappenden

Representation Summary:

No. But If there are brownfield sites to develop, yes. Priority should be to
extend existing business parks and office blocks wherevever possible

Full text:

see attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12164

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Roland Lazarus

Representation Summary:

Mixed use developments can provide the majority of the workforce and workplaces in the same location reducing the need to travel great distances to work. Locating new workplaces close to the strategic highway network and providing larger car cark areas encourages car use which is responsible for most of our carbon footprint and pollution.

The future employment need will be less with the lower housing growth target that Brentwood must use because of the restraint on land availability due to being restricted to one ninth of the Borough's area that is not Green Belt.

A lower proportion of warehousing floor space would meet future employment needs at a lower cost in terms of the area of land required.

It may be advisable to require triple glazing and air conditioning quality controls for these new sites depending on the employment use and distance from the road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12179

Received: 22/04/2015

Respondent: Valerie Godbee

Representation Summary:

It is important to allocate new sites close to the main road network (A12/A127/M25), rail stations and bus networks. It should also be noted when planning for the employment needs that there is a high level of the Brentwood population prefer to work in London.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12219

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Craske

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12268

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Louise Hollamby-Craske

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12287

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Kirsty Wilson

Representation Summary:

Unsure

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12310

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning Ltd

Representation Summary:

The emerging plan is not supported by a robust, up to date evidence base. This is required by national planning guidance to inform the emerging plan.

Full text:

See attached.

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12314

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Steven Morris

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12322

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Support allocation of employment sites in proximity to strategic highway network, M25 and A127. Codham Hall North [site ref 101B] currently provides valuable employment to meet Borough needs. The updated Economic Futures Study (2014) notes that proposed new site allocations with existing employment uses do not represent additional supply. In order to deliver net increase in employment as requested by the NPPF it is important that the current extent of employment use at Codham Hall North is formally allocated for employment purposes. This will provide certainty for existing businesses and reduce need for additional new employment sites in the Borough.

Full text:

I write on behalf of S & J Padfield and Partners with regards to the above consultation and site 101B at
Codham Hall (north of the A127).

Our comments particularly relate to chapter 4 of the consultation document concerning Economic Prosperity and consultation question 7. Question 7 states that "To enable future employment need to be met do you agree that the most sustainable approach is to allocate new sites close to the strategic highway network?"

The allocation of employment sites in proximity to the strategic highway network and to the M25 and A127 is supported.

As noted in the plan the site at Codham Hall currently provides for valuable provision for employment to meet needs within the Borough. The references on page 22 of the Strategic Growth Options Consultation is therefore supported which states: "101A Proposed as Brentwood Enterprise Park in the 2013 Preferred Options, this land presents an opportunity to provide a new business park for the Borough and meet the majority of unmet employment need. Alternative sites would not meet this need together and so an alternative piece of land would need to be identified if this site were not to come forward."

This approach is reflected in the update to the Council's Economic Futures Study carried out by Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners (December 2014) which provides important evidence on this topic. The NLP report notes at paragraph 4.5 that "proposed new employment site allocations 101B (Brentwood Enterprise Park) and 108 (The Old Pump Works, Great Warley Street) have existing employment uses on site and therefore do not represent additional land supply". In order to deliver a net increase in employment provision as requested by the NPPF and set out in the NLP report it is therefore especially important that the current extent of employment use at Codham Hall North is formally allocated for employment purposes. This will provide certainty for existing businesses at the site and assist in reducing the overall need for additional new employment sites in the Borough.

I attach a plan indicating the extent of existing employment uses and we would request that the proposed allocation is drawn to accord with this area.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12341

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12362

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor).

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12385

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12398

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Powell

Representation Summary:

Yes. This would not be met in the Doddinghurst site as the restricted access to Brentwood itself is quite a serious issue for several monthes of the year with a winding lane that has numerous accidents at this time of year.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12426

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Luxon

Representation Summary:

Yes. But not to the detriment of small villages.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12434

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

NPPF paragraph 21 requires the Plan to proactively encourage sustainable economic growth and identify strategic sites for local and inward investment to meet employment needs. Evidence base sets out significant need for continued job growth over Plan period. Brentwood Enterprise Park [site ref 101A] provides significant contribution to borough need but will need flexibility to meet market demands and ensure delivery (see attached Commercial Market Analysis). Site remains deliverable and development can be phased to meet short, medium and longer term needs. Site provides sufficient development quantum for Green Travel links to Brentwood and elsewhere (see attached highway report).

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12454

Received: 18/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs. Harlow

Representation Summary:

The highway network needs to be hugely updated and enlarged first.

Full text:

Q1: No. I question very strongly the need for growth anywhere in Brentwood. The area is already overcrowded, services etc are struggling to cope.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. It is never appropriate to sacrifice Green Belt and areas of beauty to commercial or living purposes. In this overcrowded world these areas are even more precious.

Q4: This road is already much too busy and dangerous.

Q6: Brownfield sites.

Q7: The highway network needs to be hugely updated and enlarged first.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Water, sewerage. Lighting (safety). Schools. All healthcare facilities. Sport and leisure facilities.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12469

Received: 18/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Martin

Representation Summary:

The roads need to enlarge.

Full text:

Q1: No. Brentwood is too busy and overcrowded already.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. To have Green Belt is precious to keep.

Q4: This road is used too much already and dangerous.

Q5: No. Growth in Brentwood now is overcrowded and services are finding it hard to cope.

Q6: Brownfield.

Q7: The roads need to enlarge.

Q8: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q13: Roads. Lighting. Healthcare. Schools.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12478

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Scott Cooper

Representation Summary:

With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12526

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Louise Cooper

Representation Summary:

Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12538

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Lynne Matthews

Representation Summary:

Yes. New retail parks, shopping malls etc require excellent transport links. These will only thrive if they are accessible from the adjoining districts also. The requirement of these being along the A127 corridor is also imperative, distancing away from the town centre to preserve private retail and business already in situ.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12553

Received: 24/04/2015

Respondent: Mr Martin Sorrell

Representation Summary:

No because this would increase air pollution and the highway network is
already congested enough and struggles to cope with its current traffic.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12654

Received: 27/04/2015

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

The allocation of new sites close to the strategic highway network is strongly supported and the AA for The Range North confirms that release of this site for employment is achievable and can be easily accommodated on the A127.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12655

Received: 27/04/2015

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

The NLP Report (2014) provides updated evidence on employment need snd set out the level of jobs alongside higher housing growth that meets OAN and accounts for past unmet need. As a result 22.7 ha of allocated emolument land is needed. Should 18.9 ha of employment land be allocated for housing, employment land need would increase to 41.65 ha, and a need for new employment sites. With the Enterprise Park highlighted, it is our view that BBC must ensure that there is a good supply of immediate deliverable employment land available in the right location and capable of accommodating a range of different uses in the short term to cater for requirements. Childerditch Industrial Park and The Range North (112D) is one such site.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments: