these proposals make eminent sense as being both sustainable and given the use, workable within the infrastructure network

Yes, I agree with this and the plan should aim to minimise increases to local traffic and noise/disturbance to residential areas. The M25 Junction 29 business park seems like a very good idea.

This make sense

Yes - the Brentwood area is well blessed with good road links, and it makes sense to locate future employment areas close to these so that the town centre and suburbs don't suffer too badly from increased traffic and parking requirements.

Not necessarily. It depends on the employment being provided. Access to transport corridors makes sense if goods are being manufactured and transported but such access may be less necessary for service industries.

New sites should be close to the improved transport ( not just highways) network needed within the borough.

see attached

see attached

see attached

See attached document

See attached document

I agree that the most sustainable approach would be to allocate sites close to the highway network

Please see attached document

See attached document

See attached consultation questionnaire.

Please refer to the attached letters relating to the proposals for development in the above mentioned area.

It is widely felt that any building developments on these existing Green spaces (regardless of actual planning definition) would have an adverse effect on all local residents, from the young to those retired.

The area is the first 'parcel' of countryside North of Brentwood and as such is the Gateway for all residents who wish to enjoy access to the paths and Bridleways that stretch out from this point.

The access to that 'Gateway' is currently along quiet, almost traffic free, lanes and is a safe passage for both young and old.

It is vital that the local community and Brentwood as a whole do not lose such a valuable and recreational asset.

Any development upon the sites, in the area, would involve road building and re-planning of the local highway, putting even greater pressure upon the already dangerous, Ongar Road/Coxtie Green road roundabout. It is probable that any such development will further endanger pedestrian access to the previously mentioned 'Gateway'.

No development should take place.

Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 176

This parcel of land referenced above, is the closest to the 'Gateway' reference point mentioned in the covering letter, any development here would destroy that change affect one experiences when leaving suburbia and entering the real countryside.

The land itself has a natural spring and most of the time is waterlogged. Great Crested Newts have been seen in its pool, bats frequent the area and other wildlife, badgers, squirrels, etc 'live' in the vicinity.

Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter.
The land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its cartilage buildings.
Area must remain Green Belt.

Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011C
SHLAA ref: G038

This parcel of land, reference above, was stated as Green Belt in an unsuccessful development application made in 2009/10. There has been no stated change in that status and the previous reasons for the rejection of the plan remain in place.
The land is habitat for bats, smaller species of deer and other wildlife, badgers, squirrels, and untold varieties of bird species including long tailed tits.

Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter.

Again the land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its curtilage buildings.

Area must remain Green Belt.

Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011B
SHLAA Ref: G038

This land is scrub land but is habitat for bats, badgers, squirrels and untold varieties of bird species including long tailed tits, protected species such as Great Crested newts are known to be in this area.

Access is a problem to this site, as mentioned in the covering letter. It is probable that this area would be sacrificed to any road improvements to support the other building plans. The land currently acts a natural sound barrier against traffic noise on the Ongar Road, especially the braking sounds emanating from the Coxtie Green / Ongar Road roundabout.

Again the land is adjacent to the Grade II Listed Gents Farm and its curtilage buildings.

Area must remain Green Belt.

Hullets Lane/ Gents Farm and Environs, Pilgrims Hatch
Site Ref: 011A
SHLAA ref: B025

In October 2013, many of the local residents objected to the proposed building of domestic property on the above site, nothing has changed in the interim concerning those objections.

We, like many locally are once again stating that this building proposal should not be considered.

Hullets/ Gents Farm area is Grade II Listed, together with its curtilage buildings which border the rear gardens of 10 to 20 Orchard Lane. The buildings cannot be demolished to gain access to the paddock, which is Green and not Brown belt land, as it would defile the meaning of the Listing.

Area must remain Green Belt.

See attached document

See attached document

See attached documents

See attached document

Using M25 widening service area

Yes

No - this isn't necessarily the best answer, the villages are used as cut throughs to the A12 and A414 - as most haulage firms know the village routes are shorter. If this is to be the solution then thought needs to be given to protect the heritage of these villages by putting traffic prevention methods in place - like width restrictions.

Support - but only if it is currently Brownfield

Agree but only if it is currently Brownfield.

Sites 079c, 106, 107 and 158 I support. NOT 177
Other sites I don't know personally so cannot comment.

The areas in Brentwood and Shenfield are already too crowded. Dunton could be reinvigorated by new money and developement.

However I would not want to see large businesses anywhere near future proposed housing. Local shops however would be recommended within future housing developments.

Further development predicated on the use of personal and individual commercial transport are not sustainable into the future. Greater coordination of alternative transport arrangements need to be considered, and linking the development plan with highway transportation will not be planning strategically for the future, where there is likely to be less opportunity for such transportation to be used

see attached

see attached

Yes - it is sensible to allocate new employment land near the existing highway network.