Support

Representation ID: 12065

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Glenda Fleming

Yes.

Object

Representation ID: 12080

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Legg

No. The A12, A1023, A128 and A129 are already highly congested. Significant improvement to infrastructure would be needed.

Support

Representation ID: 12089

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Keith Godbee

Yes. Whilst I agree with the 3 broad areas I believe priority should be given to
the A12 corridor and A127 corridor

Support

Representation ID: 12102

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Katharine Turner

Yes. Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Support

Representation ID: 12106

Received: 21/04/2015

Respondent: Elizabeth Finn Care

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

The broad areas for growth identified in the plan are generally supported. The focus of development around key transport corridors, particularly the A12 are considered to be logical in terms of access to service and employment provision.

Support

Representation ID: 12114

Received: 21/04/2015

Respondent: Elizabeth Finn Care

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

The arrival of CrossRail presents future opportunities for growth within the A12 corridor, with associated responsive demand for employment and housing provision anticipated to significantly increase in the Shenfield and Hutton area. In order for the plan to be considered to be sound, it is important that the Council allocates land for housing within the Shenfield and Hutton area, to adequately meet their housing OAN. The housing need is likely to be high in area given the rail links to London and pressures on the housing market area as a result of the shortage of housing in London. This will be exacerbated by the arrival of CrossRail.

Support

Representation ID: 12116

Received: 21/04/2015

Respondent: Elizabeth Finn Care

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

The land adjacent to Rayleigh Road is well-suited for new homes being strongly related to the settlement of Hutton with excellent access to services and the infrastructural network. Allocation of this land is required in order to positively plan for growth as required by the NPPF and would be an effective approach in planning terms.

Comment

Representation ID: 12133

Received: 22/04/2015

Respondent: S J & C M Norris

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

The submission outlines the suitability of the land adjacent to the A12, Chelmsford Road to support an apportionment of the councils OAN with the implementation of a Park and Ride scheme to and from the site and Shenfield station.

Object

Representation ID: 12134

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Susan Tappenden

No. There is too much concentration on the use of green belt to expand.

Comment

Representation ID: 12135

Received: 22/04/2015

Respondent: S J & C M Norris

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Yes, the broad areas for considering growth are supported. In particular, recognising the importance of Cross Rail and the A12 corridor as important factors to consider when planning for growth is supported. It is also supported that the document recognises that housing demands of the Borough cannot be met from brownfield land alone. In this regard, in order for the plan to comply with the NPPF it is important that the Council seek to plan for infrastructure requirements within the Borough, associated with the proposed housing and employment growth required over the plan period. Particularly with the arrival of Cross Rail.

Comment

Representation ID: 12159

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Roland Lazarus

I recognise them as defined by lines on the map. The more important distinction is between urban and unspoilt Green Belt.

Comment

Representation ID: 12170

Received: 22/04/2015

Respondent: Valerie Godbee

Yes. Although I agree with the 3 broad areas development should be focused on the A12 /A127 corridor, Brentwood Town Centre, Shenfield and West Horndon developments. This would protect our precious Green Belt North of the borough (Figure 6a) which has insufficient infrastructure to cope with anymore development, housing, retail or industrial. Local roads are used by farm vehicles which would cause disruption to the traffic flow and the A414 is already heavily congested.

Support

Representation ID: 12190

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Craske

Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 12193

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: S J & C M Norris

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

The broad areas are generally supported, the focus of these areas around transport
corridors reflects the need to focus growth and strategic scale development around these linkages. It should however be emphasised that there are smaller scale opportunities in other areas of the Borough for development that could provide modest extensions to well-serviced settlements and support the Borough's need for housing in rural areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 12194

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: S J & C M Norris

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Adequate sites in villages outside the key growth areas should be considered as suitable sites for residential development in order to comply with the NPPF desire to promote sustainable development in rural areas by locating housing, as stated in Paragraph 55. The option of small scale village growth in the north of the Borough, identified as Growth Option A within the Strategic Growth Options Consultation documents, is supported. Although the transport network may restrict large scale growth in these villages, the small scale release of green belt at village development boundaries would provide the growth required to maintain prosperous rural economies and enhance the vitality of rural communities, in line with the NPPF.

Comment

Representation ID: 12227

Received: 10/01/2015

Respondent: Mrs Sue Copeland

Have only concerns for one area which is the possible development of The Hopefield Animal Sanctuary alongside the A12.

Comment

Representation ID: 12230

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs A. Topham

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Broad areas identified are generally supported. However, it should also be emphasised that there are smaller scale opportunities for development that could provide modest extensions to well-serviced settlements and support the Borough's need for housing in rural areas.

Adequate sites in villages outside of the key growth areas should be considered as suitable for residential development in order to comply with NPPF paragraph 55 (sustainable development in rural areas with housing that enhances or maintains vitality of rural communities.

Comment

Representation ID: 12241

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited

Agent: GL Hearn

Each area exhibits different characteristics that impact upon ability to accommodate future housing growth. Balanced spatial strategy needed, helping meet development needs from all settlements across the Borough. Housing growth at each settlement should meet local needs, and be commensurate to the sustainability credentials of the settlement, in accordance with NPPF paragraph 14 (presumption in favour of sustainable development). Support identification of the majority of new housing growth in the A12 Corridor as this is the most sustainable location in the Borough. Other settlements should respond to local needs only in accordance with NPPF paragraph 55 (housing in rural areas).

Support

Representation ID: 12254

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ms Louise Hollamby-Craske

Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Support

Representation ID: 12279

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Kirsty Wilson

Yes, they are most suitable for consideration. However Green Belt Land should remain protected, its main purpose is to protect land around urban centres from urban sprawl, maintain forestry and agricultural areas and wildlife habitats. There are numerous run down commercial sites on non-green belt land that would benefit from regeneration.
Rural areas lack infrastructure required for development, they are for farming communities and not fit for large development. It will affect local residents and communities, such as residents, horse-riders, dog-walkers, who rely on access to woodland and whose safety is already jeopardised by traffic.

Support

Representation ID: 12295

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Steven Morris

Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 12321

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning Ltd

Representation documentation has been submitted which have assessment of urban design, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Green Belt Assessment and site visibility. The are part of the case being made for the release of land to the east of West Horndon.
Comparison of the West Horndon site with the Dunton Garden Suburb is made in these terms.

Support

Representation ID: 12323

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Areas considered generally appropriate. Focus around transport corridors reflects need to focus growth around these links. Strategic scale development is best located close to established road links and railway stations, and A127 corridor in particular.

Need to continue considering linkages between identified corridors. Brentwood Enterprise Park includes potential to deliver Green Transport Linkages between new employment provision, key settlements, and railway stations. Likely to include links into Brentwood to ensure site is fully sustainable whilst recognising that enterprise parks generating traffic movements from large goods vehicles will be best located at the strategic road network.

Support

Representation ID: 12327

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles

Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Support

Representation ID: 12348

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles

Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Support

Representation ID: 12370

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris

Yes, Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 12381

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning Ltd

The following documents have been submitted as part of the representations commenting on the Strategic Growth Options:

Questionnaire;
Strategic Growth Options Consultation and Sustainability Appraisal - Interim Report (URS), January 2015. Representations on behalf of Countryside Properties (UK) Ltd
Appendices
1 Site Location Plan
2 Odyssey Markides - Land at West Horndon, Brentwood, Representations about Dunton Garden Suburb Consultation. January 2015
3 Rummey Design. Lane east of West Horndon, Essex - Urban Design, Landscape and Green Belt Assessment
4 Odyssey Markides - Land at West Horndon, Brentwood - Strategic Growth Options - Highways. February 2015
5 RPS. West Horndon, Essex - An Archaeological Desk. Based Assessment. October 2014
6 Richard Graves Associates. West Horndon, Extended Phase I Survey. January 2015

Object

Representation ID: 12392

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Powell

No. Sites under consideration should have better services and transport access

Object

Representation ID: 12393

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Roger Powell

No

Comment

Representation ID: 12407

Received: 23/04/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Andrew Martin Planning Ltd

The SHMA claims compliance with work by Edge Analytics for the Essex Planning Officers Association. It does however not take account of the very latest figures as set out in Phase 6, published in September 2014. In addition the Government is shortly to publish 2012 - based Household Projections that will provide a more reliable set of figures, from the 2011 census, upon which to base an assessment of housing need.