Question 1
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12807
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Wood
No. I agree that new houses must be built somewhere! However this area is already seriously stretched regarding schooling and parking.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12819
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: Aedis Homes Limited.
Agent: Smart Planning Ltd
South Essex Golf Club. It is acknowledged that the Council need to find suitable land with capacity for growth, this submission puts forward a site that can easily accommodate a new hotel with conference and leisure facilities. It is therefore submitted that this new site is considered to be suitable for a country club style hotel which will significantly benefit the local community. The Council are requested to consider this site for inclusion within their emerging Local Plan.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12840
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers
No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.
Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.
Q4: Not sure.
Q5: No.
Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4
Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.
Q13: Don't know.
These questions are very biased and vague.
I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12855
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes
The three broad areas are suitable for consideration, but there are many limitations and penatlies with the area "North of the Borough."
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12870
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: J. Matthews
I am totally overwhelmed by the shear amount of proposed housing within the Brentwood area over the next 15 years. As much as I understand that some development needs to take place, I was not aware that housing could be built on Green Belt land.
I was only handed the Strategic Growth Option Plan on Sunday so have not had much time to scrutinise the document. It would seem that there has not been much of an attempt to publicise the document. However, I am totally overwhelmed by the shear amount of proposed housing within the Brentwood area over the next 15 years.
As much as I understand that some development needs to take place, I was not aware that housing could be built on Greenbelt land.
I also feel strongly for the lack of infrastruture that seems to support each new built that is developed. With this in mind I can only strongly appose any new development that is currently being planned.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12873
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd
No.
Q1: No
Q2: No
Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.
Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.
Q5: No.
Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.
Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12889
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban
Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12911
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price
Splitting the borough in to the three areas of "North", "A12 Corridor" and "A127 Corridor" appears to make sense given the different characteristics of these areas.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12939
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry
Yes
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12946
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ronan Hart
Yes
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12957
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Anderson Group
Agent: Bidwells
Representations are made with respect to site 077 in Blackmore. The Anderson Group has commissioned evidence in respect of landscape, ecology, flood risk, highways impact and utilities.
See attached documents.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12960
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Hermes Fund Managers Limited
Agent: McGough Planning Consultants
Hermes understands and supports the approach taken in the identification of the three broad areas, but only so far as this does not detrimentally affect the redevelopment potential of the industrial estates within West Horndon.
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12980
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Stratford
As the A127 corridor can be expanded to cope with increased road traffic & increased rail traffic, including an additional rail station, disruption to the whole of Essex will be confined to a smaller area both during construction & once housing is completed & occupied, as long as local amenities to this area (schools, GPs, shops) are adequately provided for the increased population, so sites around West Horndon & Dunton Hills seem the best options. Dispersing development to multiple sites over a wider area would clearly result in more widespread disruption throughout Essex both during construction & once new housing occupied, which would seem a major disadvantage.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12992
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker
Yes but not at the detriment to the Village environments which have proved to be a positive factor for the house holders to enjoy with benefits both in prosperity and in terms of psychologically wellbeing.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13024
Received: 08/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Elaine Smith
There are many things to be considered for Dunton I feel development would be a good thing, it would improve an otherwise run down area , bringing connections to Brentwood ,Basildon and London through road and possibly rail if there was a station built on the line it would be an easy commute to London opening up job prospects to residents in both Dunton and Horndon.
See attached.