Question 11
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12292
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kirsty Wilson
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3/4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12318
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Steven Morris
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12345
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - footpaths: 4
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12367
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12389
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12402
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Roger Powell
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Children : 3
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12430
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Luxon
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12459
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs. Harlow
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q1: No. I question very strongly the need for growth anywhere in Brentwood. The area is already overcrowded, services etc are struggling to cope.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. It is never appropriate to sacrifice Green Belt and areas of beauty to commercial or living purposes. In this overcrowded world these areas are even more precious.
Q4: This road is already much too busy and dangerous.
Q6: Brownfield sites.
Q7: The highway network needs to be hugely updated and enlarged first.
Q8: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q13: Roads. Water, sewerage. Lighting (safety). Schools. All healthcare facilities. Sport and leisure facilities.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12473
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Martin
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q1: No. Brentwood is too busy and overcrowded already.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. To have Green Belt is precious to keep.
Q4: This road is used too much already and dangerous.
Q5: No. Growth in Brentwood now is overcrowded and services are finding it hard to cope.
Q6: Brownfield.
Q7: The roads need to enlarge.
Q8: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q13: Roads. Lighting. Healthcare. Schools.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12483
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Scott Cooper
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12500
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr R Thomas
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12506
Received: 22/04/2015
Respondent: Valerie Godbee
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Other- Flood plain (Fig 15) Blackmore Wooded Farmland/ Heritage (Fig 16) 4:
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12530
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Louise Cooper
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12542
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Lynne Matthews
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12557
Received: 24/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Martin Sorrell
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12758
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanna Durrell
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q1: Do not build on green land.
Q2: No. Please let small villages remain part of English heritage and not overpopulate them.
Q3: Yes, leave the Green Belt alone. Do not build on Green Belt.
Q4: I think this has already happened near Dunton Ford's. Another large town has been created but where are the schools and why have the roads not been addressed already to deal with the extra population?
Q5: No. I don't want to live in a London Borough. I like that we are a small town and have a community feel.
Q6: No.
Q7: No.
Q8: Retail is a key part of our community. Not big supermarkets and department stores.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 3
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes. The new port at Tilbury and the impact our village will have if the M25 and A130 fails to work. A128 will be used as a cut through to bypass the roads. Pollution and safety has not been addressed.
Q13: Ensuring our roads are safe and well maintained including pavements.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12772
Received: 24/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Copps
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q1: No. This is mainly Green Belt plus fields. Please let there be some open spaces in Brentwood.
Q2: No. The infrastructure and facilities and local services are already stretched to the max.
Q3: No.
Q4: None. Find somewhere else.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Do not touch Green Belt.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: No.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Being a village which are slowly being lost in England: 5
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: No.
Q13: Making existing roads more roadworthy. Dealing with speed limits, especially on A128 which can be very dangerous. More buses and school buses to encourage more use.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12787
Received: 29/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Edna Connaway
Houses: 4
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreational Facilities: 3
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12795
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: John E Rolfe
All roads in this area have not really been materially increased in the last 50 years. Where is the vision and planning for the future?
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12804
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: John E Rolfe
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12817
Received: 30/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Wood
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12850
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kelly Bowers
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4
Q1: No. I think the government need to look at unused inner city buildings, derelict land and so forth. Keep our Green Belt identify, protect our heritage and not overbuild.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Keep our villages especially Blackmore as it is. We haven't the resources and the roads would become dangerous, congested and like a town.
Q4: Not sure.
Q5: No.
Q6: Is this a question or a statement? I do not agree with using Green Belt at all. I strongly believe that Brentwood or elsewhere could be developed more.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: As in what provision? Don't know.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Green Belts saved re Woollard Way - my road and my children's view and safety: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Space and Tranquillity, English Heritage: 4
Q12: Quality of life, enjoying greenery of a natural environment. Safety for our children to grow up more free, not a built up area - this is why we moved to Blackmore, Woollard Way.
Q13: Don't know.
These questions are very biased and vague.
I do not want Woollard Way - the brownfield area of Green Belt to be developed / built on. This will devastate us. We moved here for the greenery and views. This will devalue our homes, effect our children's freedom and security. A close made into a noisy road would be categorically wrong and devastating. All the children love watching the horses, wildlife in the field next to use, they play out with no through traffic.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12866
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Jefferyes
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12883
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Dean Shepherd
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q1: No
Q2: No
Q3: Yes - The proposed site will increase traffic to a quiet road in the village that doesn't have the capacity to accommodate increased traffic.
Q4: No because the site isn't located near the A127.
Q5: No.
Q6: No these should stay Green Belt as the feel of the area will become urbanised and not village like.
Q7: No.
Q8: Yes - The population of the village has increased and the shops are struggling to cope this is without future development.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes - The additional funds should be spent improving residents safety by erecting more street lights and local buses.
Q13: Pedestrian safety and local street lights, buses, better road surfaces.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12908
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Luke Wenban
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12930
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Leanne Wenban-Price
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12943
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mrs Anika Perry
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12955
Received: 05/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ronan Hart
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
See attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12989
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Stratford
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other: -
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 13021
Received: 07/05/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Bunker
Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other: -
See attached