Question 7
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7012
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Joanne Gill
Yes. Also close to rail.
see attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7028
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Freeman
Brentwood has very high employment rates, we don't need new sites.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7044
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Holbrook
No comment made
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7057
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs A. Small
Any new employment opportunities must be created where road and rail links exist.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7070
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Lesley Mitchelmore
Only where the highway network has the capacity to accommodate the increased traffic. It would be more sustainable if people were able to walk to work.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7089
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Alan Smith
Yes
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7090
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Stiles
Geographical areas for employment are no longer as important considering the flexible nature of modern work.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7109
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Trevor Zucconi
A small amount of development yes but the planned development if sited along major highway networks , already under pressure will simply exacerbate the traffic issues, reduce quality of life further. The best option is to spread development as far and wide as possible reducing impact locally.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7134
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr. Norman Russell
Yes.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7141
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola McNicol
Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area. These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7169
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Stephen Allpress
Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for
primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment
opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must
however be accessible via regular and reliable public transport as well as via
road
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7214
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Frank Last
Yes.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes
Q3: Yes. Green Belt land should not be considered for development.
Q4: Any site that is considered for development should be looked at carefully as once it is built on it is lost as green space forever.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed first. We must not keep losing greenfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes.
Q13: The repairing and maintenance of our existing road and keeping the Borough clean and tidy.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7227
Received: 06/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch
Yes.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Seems wrong to force on villages in Green Belt that struggle to cope with road, transport, communications as it currently stands.
Q4: Seems more logical to go where the capacity for growth in one area rather than several areas thus causing less disruption.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Development of brownfield sites is preferable.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.
Q9: No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. Blackmore seems to accommodate barely its present requirements. Transport is rubbish.
Q13: Along the A127 or the A12.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7240
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Owen
Yes, within a village new sites for employment are not a major consideration.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7252
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand
No comment made
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7254
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7274
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Deidre Belton
No.
Q1: No. I strongly object to any building on our countryside.
Q2: Neither. Do not know the issues raised in some areas.
Do not develop around Ingrave & Herongate.
Q3: Don't know. Leave Ingrave & Herongate out of the equation.
Q4: Anywhere but Ingrave & Herongate.
Q5: No. Leave our countryside alone.
Q6: Develop on brownfield sites only so long as it does not affect Ingrave & Herongate countryside.
Q7: No.
Q8: Don't know what this means.
Q9: No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: It is difficult enough to obtain doctors appointments and other care facilities in this area without anymore rebuild.
Q13: No comment.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7286
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Savill
Yes. What future employment needs.
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU businesses for profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial areas.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7298
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: MR Richard Savill
Yes. What future employment needs?
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU business' for pure profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial area.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs?
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7307
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Helena Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7319
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Harrington
Yes, the concern is that there are limited public transport available in village to access work in nearby towns.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7333
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr George Hand
No comment made
Please see attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7367
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington
Yes, the concern is that there are limited public transport available for those in villages to access nearby towns.
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7380
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7396
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7426
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7441
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
Yes. With the industrial estates at West Horndon expected to be developed for primarily residential development, it is key that replacement employment opportunities are provided within the local area (A127 Corridor). These must however be accessible via public transport as well as via road.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7457
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Jennie Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7480
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr James Carpenter
No comment made
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7496
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Beverley Graves
Some A12 and A127
See attached document