Object

Representation ID: 30603

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Gary Durdant-Pead

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Houses were reduced from 70 to 50 by BBC due to high level of concerns by majority of Blackmore residents. For the Inspector to just increase back to 70 ignores the point of asking for public response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30615

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Louise Roast

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

What is the point in consulting with Blackmore residents on the LDP for the Inspector to just increase the number houses back up to 70.

Object

Representation ID: 30617

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Rita Tuffey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

To reduce the proposed number of houses to 50, then increase back to 70 does not have the appearance of the public's response being taken into consideration at all.

Object

Representation ID: 30630

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Wilkinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Housing density was reduced from 70 to 50 by BBC due to the many local residents concern. To arbitrarily increase this back to 70 ignores the point of asking for public response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30640

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Derek Tillet

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

How can the BBC reduce the houses from 70 to 50 due to the concern of the majority of Blackmore residents, then the Inspector just increases back up to 70, that is not listening to the public and not asking for publics response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30643

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Ian and Janet Tennet

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Flooding in Blackmore is a problem, removing fields & wildlife habitat is contrary to what government advocates. There were better alternative sites BBC did not investigate thoroughly. We already have 12 homes in Red Rose Lane those should be part of village allocation. The Environment Agency needs to be involved.

Object

Representation ID: 30648

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Finn Thompson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Increasing the number of houses to 70, after reducing them to 50 due to residents concern shows a disregard for public response to the LDP which BBC claimed to encourage and asked for.

Object

Representation ID: 30678

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Kyle Pounds

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Houses were reduced from 70 to 50 by BBC due to high level of concerns by majority of Blackmore residents. For the Inspector to just increase back to 70 ignores the point of asking for public response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30689

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Pounds

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Houses were reduced from 70 to 50 by BBC due to high level of concerns by majority of Blackmore residents. For the Inspector to just increase back to 70 ignores the point of asking for public response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30704

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Robert Strange

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Green Belt protection has been ignored with no evidence of the required exceptional circumstances. R25 & R26 exhibit a lot of the characteristics used in other areas to block development on Green Belt. Other more appropriate development sites and brownfield sites were either removed from the plan (eg Honeypot Lane) or ignored.

Object

Representation ID: 30718

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Diane Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Brentwood Council do what they please, never talk about the consequence of their action. Blackmore is in a dip the water gather. Development has to deal with flooding, school improvement, new drainage system before any discussion take place. There are other sites that could be built on and on a decent system. This is not infill, it's mass destruction.

Object

Representation ID: 30720

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Debbie Spencer

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

BBC reduced the number of houses to be built from 70 to 50. For the inspector to increase the number back to 70 begs the question why ask the public for a response to the LDP if you are then going to ignore that response?

Object

Representation ID: 30725

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janet Parris

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

I feel this is not the right area to build that many homes, my reason for saying this is I live here and I know the infrastructure just couldn't cope with that many homes, the houses you are proposing will not include any affordable homes, so our children would have no hope of being able to live here and I thought Brentwood Council assured us that that would not happen. It would not increase local employment, again, I thought Brentwood Council assured us it would. There would be a massive increase in transport which I feel our roads just couldn't cope with all this is apart from the local school not being able to taken any more children. So again everyone would be in their cars on roads that just could not cope.

Object

Representation ID: 30729

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Sirrell

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

The sites for development in Blackmore were selected by developers (on Green Belt land) and a full sustainability (and suitability) review needs to be undertaken. Blackmore doesn't meet any of Brentwood Borough Councils strategic tests so why are these sites being considered?

Object

Representation ID: 30735

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Slimm

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Blackmore is a small settlement which is experiencing episodes of flooding and sewage overflow causing pollution in the area and downstream into Chelmsford. Building on the two green field sites R25 and R26 will increase flooding within the village. Development on this location contradicts with long term climate change objectives.

Object

Representation ID: 30743

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Darryl Pounds

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Houses were reduced from 70 to 50 by BBC due to high level of concerns by majority of Blackmore residents. For the Inspector to just increase back to 70 ignores the point of asking for public response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30747

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Smart

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Flooding is a massive issue in Blackmore, the removal of these 2 fields will make this worse. Roads are already blocked for hours when it rains. Why has this changed from 50 to 70 houses? Loss of wildlife important to the local area.

Object

Representation ID: 30750

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Faye Osborne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

BBC reduced the number of houses to be built from 70 to 50. For the inspector to increase the number back to 70 begs the question why ask the public for a response to the LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 30753

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr John Randall

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Loss of wildlife, increase flood risk, don't believe exceptional circumstance test was carried out with any conviction (otherwise brown field sites would have been identified and included in LDP).

Object

Representation ID: 30763

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Ronald Sanders

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

BBC reduced the number of houses to be built from 70 to 50. For the inspector to increase the number back to 70 despite public opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 30799

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Jennifer Barry

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Flooding area in and around Blackmore. Will BBC be taking responsibility for the flooding risk which will be bound to repeat due to proposed development and climate change. Not sustainable location as Blackmore is at capacity for existing residents. Primary school is full, no senior school here.

Object

Representation ID: 30809

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Stephen Slaughter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Blackmore has a long history of flooding, developing 2 green fields will make it worse. BBC did not carry out exceptional circumstances test.

Object

Representation ID: 30822

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janis Smith

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Brentwood Council have ignored all representations given by BVHA concerning our much love local village and in doing so has/is ignoring the right needs for the village and all who live here. Flooding and drainage capacity cannot cop. Local amenities and infrastructure cannot cop ie. shops, car park, broadband. Planners are willing to throw Green Belt protection out the door.

Object

Representation ID: 30825

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Mollie Stenning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Blackmore does not meet strategic aim for BBC or government, has poor public transport. Development will rely on car use, resulting in more pollution, congestion. Blackmore has a history of flooding, removing 2 large fields will make the situation worse.