Question 8
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11846
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs M Craddock
Yes.
Q1: Yes. The character of the areas is completely different.
Q2: No. A127 at full capacity - widening could cause massive problems for local residents. Flooding, already a recurring problem, does not seem to have been addressed. Open fenland, with its wildlife and beauty, is greatly valued by residents of West Horndon.
Q3: Site 200 [Entire Land East of A128, south of A127] massively preferred to 037 [A/B/C - Land West of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon], 038 [A/B - Land East of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon], and 126 [Land East of West Horndon, South of Station Road].
Brownfield sites should be used for future building before exploiting greenfield sites.
New, appropriate infrastructure should be carefully planned before any building takes place.
My concern is that West Horndon will no longer be a village, its character treasured by local residents.
Q4: Site 200 has the greater potential to afford future benefit for the village of West Horndon.
Development unsuitable in sites 037 A,B,C [Land West of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon] and 038 A,B [Land East of Thorndon Avenue, West Horndon] which are prone to becoming water logged - please refer to paragraph 100 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Q5: Yes. Sustainable development in the Borough of Brentwood should be sought in all areas of the Borough, and especially along the A12 Corridor, to address the projected level of housing needs.
Q6: Brownfield sites are preferable for development of housing. Greenfield sites should only be used when distinct levels of benefit to the existing area are proved.
Q7: Yes. Employment opportunities are a must, and accessible by road, rail and public transport (including buses).
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Not sure.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Other - Flooding Prevention: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. Travel links to surrounding areas/communities.
Q13: An holistic infrastructure Plan must be delivered to ensure development is undertaken in a sustainable manner.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11868
Received: 20/04/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Drake
Yes.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11873
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Warner
Yes. Promote Town Centres as this reduces traffic.
Q1: Yes. A12 and A127 should be promoted.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes. It is not appropriate to develop sites 76 [Land south of Redrose Lane, north of Orchard Piece, Blackmore], 77 [Land south of Redrose Lane, north of Woollard Way, Blackmore], 199 [Land to the East of Ingatestone Road, Blackmore], 202 [Land to the South of Blackmore, off Blackmore Road] and 203 [Land to the West of Blackmore, off Blackmore Road] as this is a conservation area and within the Green Belt.
Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield sites must be developed in preference to green sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. Promote Town Centres as this reduces traffic.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - A Tourist Attraction: -
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Historic Buildings including Church: 2
Q12: No.
Q13: Health provision.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11916
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Karen Powell
Yes. Better access to the south of Brentwood would fulfil the the access issues not only for new housing but also allow town centre growth and encourage visitors from the larger conurbations to the south of Brentwood.
see attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11929
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Robinson
Yes.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11950
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs N. Blake
Yes, but for diverse and quality retail units.
Brentwood Town centre needs much better shops if it is to justify the expensive car parking it currently offers.
The town needs to distinguish between all day parking for people who work and part day car parking for people who want to shop.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11963
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sarah Lafferty
Yes
see attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11977
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Susan Webb
Yes. This is by far the most sensible and transport links are aready there to make this increasingly viable
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12006
Received: 21/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs J.M. Wix
Yes, but no point if most housing is south of A127. Unreliable bus service from West Horndon south of A127 (three busses a day in and back to Brentwood). Dunton unknown as yet but more likely to shop in Laindon.
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12024
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Vera Grigg
Yes. In order for Brentwood to remain a town it needs a town centre. Out of town shopping areas are losing their attraction and they are accessible nearby - Gallows Corner and Chelmsford.
Q1: No. The areas specified do not mention [sites] 028C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] plus sites on the edge of the Green Belt south of Hutton 028A/B [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood]. These are huge areas of land that are not part of the A12 and A127 Corridors, nor villages to the North of the Borough. This specific area is not considered, shown but not part of the planning.
Q2: No. North of the Borough - Insufficient attention to infrastructure - transport, schools, GPs.
A12 Corridor - Yes.
A127 Corridor - Yes.
No mention of [sites] 028A,B,C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] - Green Belt which should not be used for housing. Now much used by walkers, open space, historical woodlands, ample footpaths and good tracks. Home to much wildlife, birds, small mammals. Should not be touched as page 27 consultation document. Difficulty of ingress/egress to Hall Lane - no pavements and too much traffic on Hanging Hill Lane.
Q3: Yes. The A127 Corridor is the most suitable as it lies between the A127 and the railway. Not prime agricultural land, room for expansion between these two networks. Already a core of infrastructure which could be added to.
A12 Corridor - Yes if confined to areas between A12 and railway.
North of the Borough - Only if small sites were made available.
Q4: The A127 Corridor.
Q5: No. But only if between A12 and railway.
Q6: To develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. In order for Brentwood to remain a town it needs a town centre. Out of town shopping areas are losing their attraction and they are accessible nearby - Gallows Corner and Chelmsford.
Q9: No. With all the Green Belt around us at [sites] 028A,B,C [Land east of Running Waters, Brentwood] and 192 [Heron Hall, Herongate, Brentwood] we delight in the open spaces available to us.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Accessibility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: Yes. Growth of present population - schools expansion.
Q13: Transport. GP facilities. Education - schools.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12052
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Richard Latham
Yes. Definitely target retail development towards developing a vibrant, attractive and interesting town centre for the local community of Brentwood Borough.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12062
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Maureen Butler
Yes. Reduce traffic by promoting town centres.
Q1: Yes. A12 and A127 Corridors should be encouraged and not North due to lack of infrastructure.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes. Blackmore is in a conservation area and within the Green Belt. Sites 076, 077, 199, 202 and 203. So are not suitable.
Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: In borough villages, if land needs to be released at all, then brownfield sites should be used.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. Reduce traffic by promoting town centres.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Tourist Attraction: 2
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other - Historic Buildings including Church & Priory: 2
Q12: No.
Q13: Health provisions.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12074
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Glenda Fleming
Yes.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12096
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Keith Godbee
Yes. This seems obvious as the Town centre already has some of the
infrastructure needed
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12119
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Katharine Turner
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12127
Received: 21/04/2015
Respondent: Elizabeth Finn Care
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
A focus on retail development in town centres is generally supported. The development of housing on sites accessible to town centres such as Rayleigh
Road, Hutton will assist in supporting the vitality of the boroughs town centres.
See attached documentation.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12143
Received: 22/04/2015
Respondent: S J & C M Norris
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Yes, the 'Town Centre First' approach is generally supported. The proposed park and ride has the potential to offer an alternative to parking within Brentwood/ Shenfield Town Centre and could help support existing retailers within the existing centres. In particular it is considered that A1/A2 uses should be restricted to town centre locations. The proposed site 158 has the ability to offer potential for A3/A4 use as part of the proposals, which given the scale would not conflict with the Town Centre First Approach.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12150
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Susan Tappenden
Yes.
see attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12165
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Roland Lazarus
Yes, but with a smaller rise in population than the latest version of the Brentwood Plan, as is dictated by the Green Belt restraint, current vacant retail sites and an increasing use of internet shopping, I am not convinced of the need for retail development beyond the existing retail offer.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12221
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Maureen Craske
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12250
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited
Agent: GL Hearn
We support retail development in existing town centres, especially at locations such as Brentwood due to its high levels to public transport accessibility and planned Crossrail development. In parallel with this strategy, Brentwood should be the overall focus for development for a range of uses including retail and housing.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12269
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Louise Hollamby-Craske
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12288
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Kirsty Wilson
Yes
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12315
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Steven Morris
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12342
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola Giles
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12363
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr. Stuart Giles
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12386
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Morris
Yes.
Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres.
Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12399
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Roger Powell
Better access to the south of Brentwood would fulfil the the access issues not only for new housing but also allow town centre growth and encourage visitors from the larger conurbations to the south of Brentwood.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12427
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Luxon
Yes retail development should always be "town centre first".
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12433
Received: 03/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Larkin
Yes. Park and Ride should be considered at strategic points around the town and to Shenfield Station
see attached