Question 12
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10580
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: John Allen
No.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10600
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Ashley
Yes. Already close to capacity.
Q1: No. I object to building on Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites only.
Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127.
Q5: Yes. Only on brownfield sites.
Q6: Most of the housing will not be for local need.
Q7: No. We have enough empty shops and business premises that will enable employment opportunities.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. Already close to capacity.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10601
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Vivienne Thompson
As stated throughout I think improving the infrastructure is the main issue, you have to consider the impact of West Horndon Village, the A128 and all the needs of the community, e.g. schools, shops, doctors, public transport, all of which are not currenlty sufficient to support any significant increases in population
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10619
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Catherine Ashley
Yes. Already close to capacity.
Q1: No. I object to building on Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. Brownfield sites only.
Q4: There is no capacity for growth on the A127.
Q5: Yes. Only on brownfield sites.
Q6: Most of the housing will not be for local need.
Q7: No. We have enough empty shops and business premises that will enable employment opportunities.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes. Already close to capacity.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10638
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Jan & Graham Wootton
No. Ingatestone Nursery development is not well planned. The two village schools are small. There is only one GP surgery in Ingatestone. Flooding occurs regularly.
see attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10641
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Miss Evelyn Bush
It currently takes a week - 10 days to obtain a doctors appointment. There are many pot holes on the road. A new bus shelter with a seat would be much appreciated.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10661
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Alison Ratcliffe
Blackmore has no capacity e.g. schools, roads, amenities for any further growth.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10669
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ruth Dimond
Yes
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10679
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Herring
Number of people: 2
Yes. The fact that you are completely changing a small village whose facilities are appropriate to its residents.
Q1: Yes. Accept there is a need for growth but not to alter existing small community villages.
Q2: No.
Q3: A large space near to A127 which does not effect the living conditions of a small village community seems a more acceptable choice to progress development. [site ref 200]
Q4: Dunton site. [site ref 200]
Q5: Yes. The old scrap yard of the A12 towards Mountnessing has yet to be developed? [site ref 107]
Q6: Better to develop independent sites on edges with access to highway network.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. With a fair mix of shops retail not just restaurants and bars.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community Spirit: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Peaceful tranquil spots: -
Q12: Yes. The fact that you are completely changing a small village whose facilities are appropriate to its residents.
Q13: Developing small new communities near t main road access not changing existing small areas.
Q1: Yes. Accept there is a need for growth but not to alter existing small community villages.
Q2: No.
Q3: A large space near to A127 which does not effect the living conditions of a small village community seems a more acceptable choice to progress development.
Q4: Dunton site. [site ref 200]
Q5: Yes. The old scrap yard of the A12 towards Mountnessing has yet to be developed? [site ref 107]
Q6: Better to develop independent sites on edges with access to highway network.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. With a fair mix of shops retail not just restaurants and bars.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community Spirit: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - Peaceful tranquil spots: -
Q12: Yes. The fact that you are completely changing a small village whose facilities are appropriate to its residents.
Q13: Developing small new communities near t main road access not changing existing small areas.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10700
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Linda Nobbs
Yes. There are many important issues:
Schools - intake for our two schools is large, and so are classroom numbers;
Doctor - it currently takes a week to obtain an appointment;
Roads - poorly maintained, with many potholes and crumbling at edges; narrow;
Telecommunications - old wiring causing faults on lines and bad connections' intermittent broadband with low mbps;
Water, sewerage and electrical grids also need discussing.
Living in the countryside has responsibility. We need to be sensible to our environment and keep our green spaces clean, natural and enjoyable.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10724
Received: 12/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Thomas Benham
No
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10734
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Mr David Lister
The A128 will be heavily impacted by any development and this should also be considered for upgrading.
Q1: Yes - They have different aspects, so yes.
Q2: No - Flooding is a problem on the A127 corridor. The A127 is busier than the A12 and the A12 has more potential for development. The open farmland of the A127 is not inferior to that elsewhere in the borough, how has this conclusion been reached?
Q3: Yes - 037 A, B and C and 126 are all Green Belt surrounding the village. If the industrial estates are developed, the 400+ houses proposed there will increase West Horndon by 70%. To build on the surrounding Green Belt as well would be inappropriate development and damaging to the local environment. Flooding would also be a major issue.
Q4: Site 200 - Dunton Garden Suburb should be developed in preference to the fields surrounding West Horndon (037, 038 & 126). Infrastructure must be established, and a buffer zone around West Horndon should be put in place to preserve the village.
Q5: Yes - As Brentwood needs so many houses, all suitable sites along the A12 should be considered. Why should it be centred around West Horndon and the A127?
Q6: Brownfield sites should always be considered in preference to Greenfield. Green Belt should be preserved.
Q7: Yes - From an environmental view as well as the practical view, this makes sense, although public transport must be provided.
Q8: Yes - Good public transport links are essential to ensure economic sustainability in the established town centres. Ease of car park facilities should also be a priority.
Q9: Yes - We have a small park at present. With the likely development of the new industrial sites and the potential development of DSG, more open space will be required for the village, certainly not less.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 2
Q12: Yes - The A128 will be heavily impacted by any development and this should also be considered for upgrading.
Q13: My priorities would be transport, health and education, which should be in place before the developments need them!
Other comments: Dunton Garden Suburb is my preferred option.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10767
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gary Middlehurst
Until you have a fully defined plan you cannot determine your objectives in resourcing those specific plans. Other issues to consider are: the true environmental impact to natural and infrastructure resources not only to residents but also to personal well-being. The impact at peak times upon travel to central transport hubs and their links needs significant further study not only locally but also to the employment centres of London and beyond.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10768
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gary Middlehurst
Pollution of what the plan proposes needs to be studied further, What are Brentwood Council looking to achieve within the plan which helps the UK carbon emissions target within any proposed growth.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10769
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gary Middlehurst
Economic prosperity will not be driven by housing alone, it will need business investment, therefore what does this look like for the whole area of Basildon, Brentwood & Ongar and Epping - Industrial; Commercial or Leisure centric this needs to be defined at a regional level. The new London Plan and 3rd London runaway will and should also feature within the BBC growth plan to enable potential impacts to be assessed.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10770
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gary Middlehurst
What are the plans towards Epping and Ongar, will this have an impact with Brentwood & Ongar being squeezed in two directions.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10792
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr M. Saddington
Existing bus services to the town centre are inadequate and the buses used are filthy broken down with the occasional decent bus. (I stopped using them because of this). Railway from West Horndon is at peak times already at capacity and the station is not usable by disabled people. The roads are also at peak times at capacity.
See attachment.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10803
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Saunders
Upgrading of support roads for development sites
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10812
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Ella Bradley
Just to underline previous comments including villages such as Blackmore is not the way forward.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10824
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mrs Maureen Slimm
Blackmore has no infrastructure for future growth.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10837
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Smith
Decent broadband speed (fibre) to all communities and not just large money making areas.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10851
Received: 14/04/2015
Respondent: Mr David Smith
Heavy traffic through village at present. Proper traffic calming measures not just 30 MPH lights at each end.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10866
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Sue Lister
As previously stated, the A127 struggles now. No information seems to be available re C2C.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: No - The A127 is always busy and there are frequent roadworks. The A12 flows much better. The A127 is prone to flooding, which causes further delays.
Q3: Yes - The areas 020 and 021 are brownfield industrial sites, which are already in the 5 year land supply. If 400-500 houses are built here, that will change West Horndon by about 80% increase in housing. 037A, B and C, 038A and B and 126 are Green Belt. This would be inappropriate development and would cause environmental harm. These fields are frequently water logged and therefore prone to flooding.
Q4: Dunton Garden Suburb is preferred. It has a great deal of potential for growth, as although it is in our parish, it is outside the village. Robust buffer zones should be established however.
Q5: Yes - Brentwood should use the available sites for significant development in these areas. As previously stated, I believe there is more capacity on the A12 rather than the A127.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed, greenfield should not be developed, and should be regarded as sacrosanct.
Q7: Yes - Transport by bus from railway stations must be established.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes - We have a park in West Horndon. The potential development of the Dunton Harden Suburb should include more open spaces for us, as DSG will impact us.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 2
Q12: As previously stated, the A127 struggles now. No information seems to be available re C2C.
Q13: Health, education and transport are what I consider to be priorities. These must be established sooner, rather than later.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10873
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jane Kelly
The road situation has barely been considered except to state widening of the A127. Would that involve encroaching on further green belt? Also it would not be sufficient as the knock on effect would be for people to use other aready busy routes around the area such as A128.
Unless you build a bypass, you are going to increase the burden of traffic on the local villages
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10886
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Claire Manning
Local infrastructure such as public transport, local schools, health care etc. Roads currently inadequate at rush hour (A127 and A12) and this will get worse.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: No - A127 is already over capacity and residential properties run right up to it. A12 should be given greater consideration. No consideration has been given to the flood risk around A127.
Q3: Yes - Brownfield sites should always be used over Green Belt. West Horndon is a small village and we wish it to stay this way. Therefore preference for site 200 over everything else.
Q4: Site 200 - albeit not enough consideration has been given to A12 corridor and this should be re-addressed.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield without question!
Q7: Yes - But consideration also needs to be given to public transport accessibility.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Other - Community: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 2
Q12: Yes - Local infrastructure such as public transport, local schools, health care etc. Roads currently inadequate at rush hour (A127 and A12) and this will get worse.
Q13: Roads, healthcare, education. We currently don't even have street lights that work.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10891
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Patricia Ramsay
What happened to the sustainability consultation on North Brentwood.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10915
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Caton
I strongly believe that owners of unoccupied residents should be heavily penalized, and if when left empty for a long time (? 12 months) without occupation they should be compulsory purchased. If this were done it would go well toward the housing needs up to 2030. Make selfish house owners pay!! Or let or sell their property.
Q1: Yes - It seems very comprehensive.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes - I think the Dunton Village is appropriate together with planned development shown on pages 192 to 197. I agree that the development of any existing village housing is to be in small packages (no more than 10).
Q4: Dunton Village.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: No I don't think its appropriate in anything other than small packages (no more than 10). In Blackmore any development as proposed by 2 applicants for anything up to 90 + 60 residents is ridiculously excessive.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 3
Other - Historic Church, St Lawrence, Blackmore: 4
Q11:
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation facilities: 4
Other - Blackmore school and village hall complex: 4
Q12: I strongly believe that owners of unoccupied residents should be heavily penalized, and if when left empty for a long time (? 12 months) without occupation they should be compulsory purchased. If this were done it would go well toward the housing needs up to 2030. Make selfish house owners pay!! Or let or sell their property.
Q13: See above.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10916
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr James Oliver
1. Building new housing near my house will devalue my property.
2. It will become a very different place to live, as we will be surrounded by a lot of people and noise, rather living in a peaceful place.
3. People live in Hutton on the basis that it is surrounded by the countryside, and this proposal will take this away
see attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10936
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Tytherleigh
Leave things as they are.
Q1: No - It is already too big.
Q2: Do not increase the size of Brentwood.
Q3: No new development.
Q4: None.
Q5: Certainly not.
Q6: No.
Q7: No.
Q8: No.
Q9: No change needed.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure use: 2
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 5
Q11: How can these aspects be occasional and frequent?
Q12: Leave things as they are.
Q13: Save our money.
Other comments: Reduce English population back to 49 million people.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10939
Received: 10/02/2015
Respondent: Mr James Knight
The quality of life and sustainability of the existing residents! Particularly where there are limited access possibilities and minimal infrastructure growth options.
The report for Doddinghurst conveniently ignores the lack of capacity at the junior school and the problems with bus services for senior schools (funding for free bus travel ceases next year). Just mentioning having 2 nurseries is merely one example of poetic licence.
see attached.