Question 11

Showing comments and forms 151 to 180 of 517

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7062

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A. Small

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7094

Received: 12/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Lee Stiles

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other -

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7115

Received: 12/03/2015

Respondent: Trevor Zucconi

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other -

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7138

Received: 12/03/2015

Respondent: Mr. Norman Russell

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other -

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7145

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Nicola McNicol

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7186

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Stephen Allpress

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7218

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Frank Last

Representation Summary:

Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes

Q3: Yes. Green Belt land should not be considered for development.

Q4: Any site that is considered for development should be looked at carefully as once it is built on it is lost as green space forever.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed first. We must not keep losing greenfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3

Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: Yes.

Q13: The repairing and maintenance of our existing road and keeping the Borough clean and tidy.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7231

Received: 06/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Seems wrong to force on villages in Green Belt that struggle to cope with road, transport, communications as it currently stands.

Q4: Seems more logical to go where the capacity for growth in one area rather than several areas thus causing less disruption.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Development of brownfield sites is preferable.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.

Q9: No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No. Blackmore seems to accommodate barely its present requirements. Transport is rubbish.

Q13: Along the A127 or the A12.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7244

Received: 16/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Owen

Representation Summary:

Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other: Tranquility 4

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7258

Received: 16/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7278

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Deidre Belton

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Full text:

Q1: No. I strongly object to any building on our countryside.

Q2: Neither. Do not know the issues raised in some areas.

Do not develop around Ingrave & Herongate.

Q3: Don't know. Leave Ingrave & Herongate out of the equation.

Q4: Anywhere but Ingrave & Herongate.

Q5: No. Leave our countryside alone.

Q6: Develop on brownfield sites only so long as it does not affect Ingrave & Herongate countryside.

Q7: No.

Q8: Don't know what this means.

Q9: No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4

Q12: It is difficult enough to obtain doctors appointments and other care facilities in this area without anymore rebuild.

Q13: No comment.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7290

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Savill

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Q1: No. Green Belt land.

Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU businesses for profiteering.

Q3: -

Q4: West Horndon industrial areas.

Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes. What future employment needs.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]

Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7302

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: MR Richard Savill

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Q1: No. Green Belt land.

Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU business' for pure profiteering.

Q3: -

Q4: West Horndon industrial area.

Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes. What future employment needs?

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]

Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7311

Received: 16/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Helena Penkul

Representation Summary:

Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7323

Received: 16/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs June Harrington

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7339

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr George Hand

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Please see attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7352

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Lawrence Harrington

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7371

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7384

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7400

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7430

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7452

Received: 13/03/2015

Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council

Agent: SJK Planning

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Other -

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7453

Received: 13/03/2015

Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council

Agent: SJK Planning

Representation Summary:

In this respect we would also refer to the Mid Essex Landscape Character Assessment (September 2006). It refers to the surrounding countryside as Horndon Fenland which it says is characterised as follows:-

* Large arable and pasture fields.

* Predominantly flat topography.

* Mature hedgerow field boundaries (sometimes gappy), which contain several single mature trees.

* Relatively sparse settlement pattern.

* Views to surrounding wooded hills to the north.

* Long distance views to pylons and Tilbury power station to the south.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7462

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Jennie Penkul

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7485

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr James Carpenter

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7500

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Graves

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7513

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr David Phillips

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7531

Received: 18/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Mason

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7554

Received: 18/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Evelyn Vincent

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 3
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Please see attached document

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7557

Received: 18/02/2015

Respondent: Stondon Massey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

see attached

Attachments: