Question 8
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7045
Received: 11/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Holbrook
Very important!
See attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7058
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs A. Small
It's important that the Town Centres remain viable to retain vital services and prevent town centres from becoming graveyards.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7091
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Stiles
If high parking charges continue to be levied on town centre car parks then consumers will continue to choose alternatives.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7097
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Alan Smith
Yes Providing they are diverse and good retail units.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7110
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Trevor Zucconi
Yes.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7135
Received: 12/03/2015
Respondent: Mr. Norman Russell
Providing we get less pubs, clubs and restaurants.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7142
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Nicola McNicol
No. New retail development will be most needed near to areas where new housing
development will be proposed. Brentwood Town Centres become congested and does not have adequate parking. Brentwood has no out-of-town retail areas where parking can be free like the Pipps Hill and Gardiners Link retail areas of Basildon.
More vision is needed for Brentwood's future retail needs
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7170
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Stephen Allpress
-Yes. Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary
"destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing
town centres.
- Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or
preferably, preceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements
including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including
the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the
road network to prevent unmanageable congestion.
see attached
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7215
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Frank Last
Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes
Q3: Yes. Green Belt land should not be considered for development.
Q4: Any site that is considered for development should be looked at carefully as once it is built on it is lost as green space forever.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be developed first. We must not keep losing greenfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes. By building retail parks away from existing town centres has a great affect on local shops and the lack of customers.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 2
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes.
Q13: The repairing and maintenance of our existing road and keeping the Borough clean and tidy.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7228
Received: 06/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Arthur Birch
Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Seems wrong to force on villages in Green Belt that struggle to cope with road, transport, communications as it currently stands.
Q4: Seems more logical to go where the capacity for growth in one area rather than several areas thus causing less disruption.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Development of brownfield sites is preferable.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Not sure. The High Street is losing out to online retail. Are more retail sites necessary? There already seems a surplus of bars, eating establishments.
Q9: No. I think there is sufficient for the current village size.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. Blackmore seems to accommodate barely its present requirements. Transport is rubbish.
Q13: Along the A127 or the A12.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7241
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Owen
Parking must be a prior consideration
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7255
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Lillie Hand
No comment made
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7275
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Deidre Belton
Don't know what this means.
Q1: No. I strongly object to any building on our countryside.
Q2: Neither. Do not know the issues raised in some areas.
Do not develop around Ingrave & Herongate.
Q3: Don't know. Leave Ingrave & Herongate out of the equation.
Q4: Anywhere but Ingrave & Herongate.
Q5: No. Leave our countryside alone.
Q6: Develop on brownfield sites only so long as it does not affect Ingrave & Herongate countryside.
Q7: No.
Q8: Don't know what this means.
Q9: No. Ingrave & Herongate are country villages and should remain so.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 4
Q12: It is difficult enough to obtain doctors appointments and other care facilities in this area without anymore rebuild.
Q13: No comment.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7287
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Yvonne Savill
Yes.
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU businesses for profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial areas.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which needs to be preserved.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland:
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7299
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: MR Richard Savill
Yes.
Q1: No. Green Belt land.
Q2: Yes. Green Belt land purchased by EU business' for pure profiteering.
Q3: -
Q4: West Horndon industrial area.
Q5: Yes. If not Green Belt.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes. What future employment needs?
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No. Much of the area around Ingrave is Green Belt which I want to preserve.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No. See below [see answer to question 13: "Road, rail, water, sewage etc"]
Q13: Road, rail, water, sewage etc.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7308
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Helena Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7320
Received: 16/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs June Harrington
Yes
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7334
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr George Hand
No comment made
Please see attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7348
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Lawrence Harrington
Yes
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7368
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Ms Tina Harrington
No comment made
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7381
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Sydney Hunter
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7397
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Miss Pauline Fox
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7427
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7443
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: West Horndon Parish Council
Agent: SJK Planning
Yes. Whilst local shops need to be provided at the village level, primary "destination" shopping locations should be focused within existing town centres. Town Centre First retail development must also be accompanied (or preferably, proceeded by) appropriate infrastructure improvements including regular and reliable public transport to all areas including the more rural ones, car parking facilities, and improvements to the road network to prevent unmanageable congestion.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7459
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Jennie Penkul
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7481
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr James Carpenter
No comment made
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7497
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Beverley Graves
No comments made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7510
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr David Phillips
No comment made
See attached document
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7528
Received: 18/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Mason
Would only partially solve problem but should be considered first
See attached document
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7543
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: Stondon Massey Parish Council
Yes.
see attached