Support

Representation ID: 20036

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

It is considered that the provision of a number of strategic residential and employment locations in or close to the town centre could help to encourage sustainable travel and reduce the pressure on the highway network, which is welcomed. In particular, development located in close proximity to Rail Stations is welcomed as it could encourage long distance trips to shift away from private car use. The A12 highway corridor also runs alongside the railway corridor and therefore this provision could help reduce the reliance of new residents and employees on private vehicle use.

Comment

Representation ID: 20037

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

It is noted that some development sites are located in close proximity to the M25 and A12 corridors and therefore consider that these could potentially have a notable impact on the number of trips at the junctions.

Comment

Representation ID: 20038

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

The proposed development locations could have a notable impact on the SRN, particularly on M25 Junction 28 and Junction 29, as well as A12 Junction 12. The flow diagrams provided within the LP evidence base appendices demonstrate that approximately 500 and 1,200 additional vehicles per hour could route via Junction 28 and 29 respectively as a result of LP development. Furthermore, there is predicted to be a material impact at A12 Junction 12, although the flow diagrams were not clear enough to calculate an accurate total.

Comment

Representation ID: 20039

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

As some notable development is located in close proximity to the A12, we would like Brentwood Borough Council to be mindful of the Road Investment Strategy proposals announced and the potential for the widening of the A12. Additionally, cross boarder impacts will need to be considered from adjacent local authorities local plans, as well as strategic rerouting as result of large schemes in the RIS such as the lower Thames Crossing. I would also draw your attention to the potential for noise and air quality problems and recommend suitable consideration is given to ensure new occupants are not adversely affected.

Comment

Representation ID: 20040

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

This site could have a significant effect on the operation of the junction, due to its size and its proximity to the junction. The LP indicates that public transport will be encouraged at the site to encourage alternatives to private car use. However, the extent of the public transport provision, access by cyclists and pedestrians is unclear at this stage. It is important that this provision is extensive and covers long distance as well as short distance trips, to try and minimise the impact of the development on the SRN.

Comment

Representation ID: 20041

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

The access and egress arrangements to this site are also potentially challenging and it is recommended that the proposals for these are discussed with Highways England to provide reassurance that safe and acceptable operation can be achieved at an early stage.

Comment

Representation ID: 20042

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

It is important that all out of town sites are well connected to the public transport network, both in terms of bus provision and access to nearby rail stations to ensure longer distance strategic trips have an alternative to private vehicle use. Whilst this approach is supported through Policy the LP does not provide specific public transport details and therefore the extent of the intended public transport provision is unknown.

Comment

Representation ID: 20043

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

Whilst specific details of the potential public transport provision at individual sites or locations are limited, there is discussion of a proposed Green Travel Route. This route is intended to provide better Borough links for strategic development allocations outside the Brentwood urban area, which is welcomed as the existing public transport provision to these locations is likely to currently be limited. Without a step change in provision these strategic development locations could result in a significant increase in vehicles on the highway network.

Comment

Representation ID: 20044

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

Whilst we support a public transport strategy for the strategic development sites, it is unclear what the exact provision may be. It is recommended that further details regarding the specific public transport provision is outlined within the LP and how the council consider this could affect mode share for residents and employees at the development sites.

Comment

Representation ID: 20045

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: National Highways

Crossrail could have an impact on the mode share of residents and employees within Brentwood and that the scheme may encourage a greater rail mode share, which could reduce the reliance on private vehicle use. It should be noted that the Council will consider the scope for 'park and walk' schemes. Depending where the 'park and walk' sites are located, this could result in an increase in vehicle trips in certain sections of the highway network. It is important that any implications for the SRN are fully considered by Brentwood Borough Council.