Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Search representations
Results for Essex County Council search
New searchSupport
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM109
Representation ID: 29533
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
2. Justified
3. Effective
With regards to access and criterion 2.b., ECC as highway and transportation authority previously made representations recommending that BBC needed to demonstrate that suitable access arrangements for all modes of travel could be achieved, including appropriate mitigation/improvements, and demonstrate what discussions had taken place the relevant Highway Authorities, to ensure that access arrangements are deliverable and agreed.
ECC confirms it has agreed in principle that an access to the site from Warley Street (B186) can be achieved.
This modification has addressed ECC’s Reg.19 Reps 22498 and 22501.
2. Justified
3. Effective
With regards to access and criterion 2.b., ECC as highway and transportation authority previously made representations recommending that BBC needed to demonstrate that suitable access arrangements for all modes of travel could be achieved, including appropriate mitigation/improvements, and demonstrate what discussions had taken place the relevant Highway Authorities, to ensure that access arrangements are deliverable and agreed.
ECC confirms it has agreed in principle that an access to the site from Warley Street (B186) can be achieved.
This modification has addressed ECC’s Reg.19 Reps 22498 and 22501.
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM110
Representation ID: 29534
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
3. Effective
The Local Plan Transport Assessment (TA) advises that the Childerditch Lane junction with the eastbound A127 (junction 14 in the TA) would operate satisfactorily post Local Plan development. Given the TA recommendations, and the requirement for applicants and decision makers to consider other borough wide policies in the Local Plan, including BE16 – Mitigating the transport impacts of development, ECC does not object in principle to the deletion, of the wording ‘consideration for improvements to A127 junction’ in criterion 1.d. of Policy E12.
This reaffirms ECC’s position as set out in paragraph 1.5 of its Hearing Statement F126B.
3. Effective
The Local Plan Transport Assessment (TA) advises that the Childerditch Lane junction with the eastbound A127 (junction 14 in the TA) would operate satisfactorily post Local Plan development. Given the TA recommendations, and the requirement for applicants and decision makers to consider other borough wide policies in the Local Plan, including BE16 – Mitigating the transport impacts of development, ECC does not object in principle to the deletion, of the wording ‘consideration for improvements to A127 junction’ in criterion 1.d. of Policy E12.
This reaffirms ECC’s position as set out in paragraph 1.5 of its Hearing Statement F126B.
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM111
Representation ID: 29535
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
2. Justified
3. Effective
In principle ECC as highway and transportation authority is satisfied that Warley Street (B186) could be used as an additional access to the Codham Hall Farm site and the additional wording in criterion 1.a. of Policy E10.
This reaffirms ECC’s position in its Examination statement F126B (paragraphs 1.2 and 1.3).
2. Justified
3. Effective
In principle ECC as highway and transportation authority is satisfied that Warley Street (B186) could be used as an additional access to the Codham Hall Farm site and the additional wording in criterion 1.a. of Policy E10.
This reaffirms ECC’s position in its Examination statement F126B (paragraphs 1.2 and 1.3).
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM113
Representation ID: 29536
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
3. Effective
ECC previously advised vehicular access via Roman Road may not be able to meet highway standards. Needed evidence to demonstrate safe and suitable access(es), for all highway users, including pedestrians and cyclists.
Following discussions, ECC as highway and transportation authority is in principle satisfied suitable access could be achieved from Roman Road, subject to highway improvements.
Recommendations of LP TA (j.24 - need to signalise A12 off slip junction with Roman Road) justifies deletion of ‘potential’.
ECC satisfied with criterion 1.a. modification, which addresses ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22510 and reaffirms position in Hearing Statement F121A (paragraphs 1.2-1.4).
3. Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority has previously advised that vehicular access via Roman Road may not be able to meet highway standards, and that BBC needed to provide the evidence to demonstrate that safe and suitable access(es), for all highway users, including pedestrians and cyclists could be achieved.
Further discussions have since taken place and ECC as highway and transportation authority is in principle satisfied that a suitable access could be achieved from Roman Road, subject to highway improvements.
The recommendations of the Local Plan Transport Assessment (TA) which identifies the need to signalise the A12 off slip junction with Roman Road (junction 24 in the TA), also justifies the proposed deletion of the word ‘potential’ from this criterion.
As a result, ECC is satisfied with the proposed modified wording for criterion 1.a. of Policy E08.
This modification addresses ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22510 and reaffirms ECC’s position as set out in its Hearing Statement F121A (paragraphs 1.2-1.4).
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM113
Representation ID: 29537
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
3. Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority has previously advised that vehicular access via Roman Road may not be able to meet highway standards, and BBC needed to provide evidence to demonstrate safe and suitable access(es), for all highway users, including pedestrians and cyclists could be achieved.
Following further discussions, ECC as highway and transportation authority is in principle satisfied that a suitable access could be achieved from Roman Road, subject to highway improvements.
ECC is satisfied with paragraph 9.227 modified wording.
This modification addresses ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22511 and reaffirms ECC’s position in Hearing Statement F121A (paragraphs 1.2-1.4).
3. Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority has previously advised that vehicular access via Roman Road may not be able to meet highway standards, and BBC needed to provide evidence to demonstrate safe and suitable access(es), for all highway users, including pedestrians and cyclists could be achieved.
Following further discussions, ECC as highway and transportation authority is in principle satisfied that a suitable access could be achieved from Roman Road, subject to highway improvements.
ECC is satisfied with paragraph 9.227 modified wording.
This modification addresses ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22511 and reaffirms ECC’s position in Hearing Statement F121A (paragraphs 1.2-1.4).
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM22
Representation ID: 29538
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority considers that the words ‘(where appropriate)’ in the first paragraph of the Policy are unnecessary. The words ‘reasonable and proportionate’ provide the necessary clarity to applicants and decision makers.
3. Not Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority considers that the words ‘(where appropriate)’ in the first paragraph of the Policy are unnecessary. The words ‘reasonable and proportionate’ provide the necessary clarity to applicants and decision makers.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM22
Representation ID: 29539
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of criterion c. it provides clarity on bodies to be engaged with on strategic transport infrastructure matters. However, clarification is sought on the definition of transport evidence. As currently written, it is unclear whether this relates to transport evidence for the Local Plan, that accompanies planning applications, and/or accompanies transport schemes from statutory bodies/stakeholders. Evidence accompanying planning applications and transport schemes provides detail and up-to-date positions which supplement the strategic overview of Local Plan evidence. It is recommended that this is clarified in supporting text to this policy.
3. Not Effective
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of criterion c. it provides clarity on bodies to be engaged with on strategic transport infrastructure matters. However, clarification is sought on the definition of transport evidence. As currently written, it is unclear whether this relates to transport evidence for the Local Plan, that accompanies planning applications, and/or accompanies transport schemes from statutory bodies/stakeholders. Evidence accompanying planning applications and transport schemes provides detail and up-to-date positions which supplement the strategic overview of Local Plan evidence. It is recommended that this is clarified in supporting text to this policy.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM22
Representation ID: 29540
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
Clarification is sought with regards to the status and progress with South Brentwood Growth Corridor Masterplan referenced in criterion i in paragraph 5.102. BBC should consider providing further narrative in the paragraph to explain this.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22350 and the position in the Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC.
3. Not Effective
Clarification is sought with regards to the status and progress with South Brentwood Growth Corridor Masterplan referenced in criterion i in paragraph 5.102. BBC should consider providing further narrative in the paragraph to explain this.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22350 and the position in the Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM22
Representation ID: 29541
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
2. Not Justified
3. Not Effective
The modification does not reflect in the supporting text the most up to date position and reference to the Transport Assessment for the Local Plan. Whilst it is recognised that this is proposed to be addressed in paragraph 5.93, it also needs reflecting in paragraphs 5.96 c., 5.101, and 5.104.
2. Not Justified
3. Not Effective
The modification does not reflect in the supporting text the most up to date position and reference to the Transport Assessment for the Local Plan. Whilst it is recognised that this is proposed to be addressed in paragraph 5.93, it also needs reflecting in paragraphs 5.96 c., 5.101, and 5.104.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
MM57
Representation ID: 29542
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
Paragraph 7.20 should be amended to provide clarity as to the difference in figures in Table 7.5 (33.76ha to 45.96ha) and the figure in paragraph 7.20 (46.64ha). This would ensure consistency.
3. Not Effective
Paragraph 7.20 should be amended to provide clarity as to the difference in figures in Table 7.5 (33.76ha to 45.96ha) and the figure in paragraph 7.20 (46.64ha). This would ensure consistency.
