067B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave

Showing comments and forms 1 to 11 of 11

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 5991

Received: 05/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Gordon MacLellan

Representation Summary:

Land at Salmonds Farm, Ingrave.
Road access very limited already.
Access to farmland behind Salmonds Farm House, one of the oldest dwellings in the Borough, would damage this historic building with HGVs both during building and then indefinately from Refuse collection, maintenance, ambulances, fire tenders, delivery lorries.
Walkers use the footpaths behind this area, coming to the area from outer London for their healthy recreation. This was the area Vaughan Williams would have enjoyed when he lived in a cottage overlooking these fields. The area survived bombs in the war without damage to historic buildings; let it not be damaged by heartless developers.

Full text:

Land at Salmonds Farm, Ingrave.
Road access very limited already.
Access to farmland behind Salmonds Farm House, one of the oldest dwellings in the Borough, would damage this historic building with HGVs both during building and then indefinately from Refuse collection, maintenance, ambulances, fire tenders, delivery lorries.
Walkers use the footpaths behind this area, coming to the area from outer London for their healthy recreation. This was the area Vaughan Williams would have enjoyed when he lived in a cottage overlooking these fields. The area survived bombs in the war without damage to historic buildings; let it not be damaged by heartless developers.

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 6893

Received: 17/02/2014

Respondent: Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) Brentwood Branch

Representation Summary:

Site is Greenbelt, not conforming with chosen Spatial Strategy, and within a Special Landscape Area.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7421

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul

Representation Summary:

In particular, I object to the proposals which greatly impact on rural communities: urban creep and destruction of community boundaries. Site 067B especially impacts my community.

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 7449

Received: 17/03/2015

Respondent: Jennie Penkul

Representation Summary:

In particular, I wish to oppose the massive intrusion into the green belt. I don't believe the A128 can accommodate more traffic. Site 067B would impact this problem.

Full text:

See attached document

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9201

Received: 08/04/2015

Respondent: Caroline Edwards

Representation Summary:

Concerned with development of site 028A, B and C, 192, 67A and B, 183, 192.

This land provides an important area of countryside in the Borough a large part of which currently falls within a special landscape area under the current local
Plan. Development would mean the loss of openness having archeological implications in such a sensitive area. It includes farmland, woodland, footways, bridleways all of which are utilised and would have a detrimental effect on the area in terms of loss of a sensitive wedge of open countryside.

There wouldn't be the infrastructure in terms of transport connections, local facilities, to cope with development.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11425

Received: 13/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ronald Phillipson

Representation Summary:

I am aware of the pressure that Central Government is putting on Brentwood Council, I strongly urge you to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land, which offers fresh air and quiet recreation for everyone in Ingrave and Herongate. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and should be protected under Green Belt legislation.

There are more suitable places in the rest of the County and Country. England has become far too London and SE centred.

Any development around the two villages would suffer badly from a lack of general amenities (e.g. transport, schools, doctors, etc.).

Full text:

Strategic Growth Options Plan (SGOP)

I am writing to comment on the proposed SGOP for Brentwood.

I have lived in the village of Ingrave for 53 years. During this time I have enjoyed countless walks in the fields and woods to the east of the A128 (NE, E and SE of the village). I am therefore very dismayed to see that all these areas appear to be under threat as part of the SGOP.

Whilst I am aware of the pressure that Central Government is (wrongly, I believe) putting on Brentwood Council, I strongly urge you to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land, which offers fresh air and quiet recreation for everyone in Ingrave and Herongate. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and should be protected under Green Belt legislation. I find it very difficult to believe that there aren't much more suitable places for housing developments in other parts of the County, not to mention large areas of the rest of the Country. England has become far too London and SE centred. This is not good in the long term.

In addition to the above, any development around the two villages would suffer badly from a lack of general amenities (e.g. transport, schools, doctors, etc.).

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11426

Received: 13/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs P.J. Jackson

Representation Summary:

I am opposed to any building on Green Belt land in Ingrave and Herongate. My reasons for doing so are environmental, not enough infrastructure, i.e. schooling doctors surgeries buses and shops, and also the extra traffic on the A128 which can now be dangerously busy.

Full text:

Re: Proposed building on Green Belt land.
I am writing to register the fact that I am opposed to any building on Green Belt land in Ingrave and Herongate. My reasons for doing so are environmental, not enough infrastructure, i.e. schooling doctors surgeries buses and shops, and also the extra traffic on the A128 which can now be dangerously busy.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11453

Received: 13/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs D Phillipson

Representation Summary:

Our family moved to Ingrave 53 years ago, the fields, woods and parks provide peaceful space away from towns and increasingly busy roads.

Disturbed that pressure is being made to find land to build thousands more houses, and I urge Brentwood Council to resist any development on Green Belt land. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources.

Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon already has inadequate amenities such as transport, schools, doctors etc. for the existing population. There would be significant additional infrastructure required.

Full text:

Strategic Growth Options Plan (SGOP)

I write to comment on the SGOP for Brentwood. Our family moved to Ingrave 53 years ago and we have enjoyed the surrounding countryside during this time. The fields, woods and parks provide peaceful space away from towns and increasingly busy roads.

My understanding of the Green Belt legislation is that in 1957 the UK Government enshrined in law and promising that this green area surrounding London would be safeguarded as a valuable landscape and a national and historic environment.
I am very disturbed that pressure is being put upon Brentwood Borough Council to find land to build thousands more houses, and I urge Brentwood Council to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and musty be protected under Green Belt legislation.

We are being pressured to increase housing in the South East and expand, and here in Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon there are already inadequate amenities such as transport, schools, doctors etc. for the existing population. Surely the UK Government should be seeking land away from the crowded south east upon which to build further housing, plus the resulting infrastructure that will be required; and again, I urge Brentwood Borough Council to resist any development on our precious Green Belt land.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11674

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Blanche Dust

Representation Summary:

Object to development on this site.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. My main concern is that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on households that border their land.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave

Q4: West Horndon.

Q5: Don't know.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes.

Q13: Schools, healthcare.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11695

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Dust

Representation Summary:

Object to development on this site.

Full text:

Q1: Yes. I am concerned that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on properties that border their land.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave

Q4: West Horndon.

Q5: Don't know.

Q6: Develop brownfield sites.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes.

Q13: Schools, healthcare.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 12695

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: One Property Group Ltd

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Attached representation shows that only part of wider site proposed to be developed, i.e. 067A developed but not 067B. This is consistent with conclusions of Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA).

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments: