067A Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 3759
Received: 05/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gordon MacLellan
Land at Salmonds Farm, Ingrave.
Road access very limited already.
Access to farmland behind Salmonds Farm House, one of the oldest dwellings in the Borough, would damage this historic building with HGVs both during building and then indefinately from Refuse collection, maintenance, ambulances, fire tenders, delivery lorries.
Walkers use the footpaths behind this area, coming to the area from outer London for their healthy recreation. This was the area Vaughan Williams would have enjoyed when he lived in a cottage overlooking these fields. The area survived bombs in the war without damage to historic buildings; let it not be damaged by heartless developers.
Land at Salmonds Farm, Ingrave.
Road access very limited already.
Access to farmland behind Salmonds Farm House, one of the oldest dwellings in the Borough, would damage this historic building with HGVs both during building and then indefinately from Refuse collection, maintenance, ambulances, fire tenders, delivery lorries.
Walkers use the footpaths behind this area, coming to the area from outer London for their healthy recreation. This was the area Vaughan Williams would have enjoyed when he lived in a cottage overlooking these fields. The area survived bombs in the war without damage to historic buildings; let it not be damaged by heartless developers.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 6892
Received: 17/02/2014
Respondent: Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) Brentwood Branch
Site is Greenbelt, not conforming with chosen Spatial Strategy, and within a Special Landscape Area.
See attached.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7420
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Vincent Penkul
In particular, I object to the proposals which greatly impact on rural communities: urban creep and destruction of community boundaries. Site 067A especially impacts my community.
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 7448
Received: 17/03/2015
Respondent: Jennie Penkul
In particular, I wish to oppose the massive intrusion into the green belt. I don't believe the A128 can accommodate more traffic. Site 067A would impact this problem.
See attached document
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9200
Received: 08/04/2015
Respondent: Caroline Edwards
Concerned with development of site 028A, B and C, 192, 67A and B, 183, 192.
This land provides an important area of countryside in the Borough a large part of which currently falls within a special landscape area under the current local
Plan. Development would mean the loss of openness having archeological implications in such a sensitive area. It includes farmland, woodland, footways, bridleways all of which are utilised and would have a detrimental effect on the area in terms of loss of a sensitive wedge of open countryside.
There wouldn't be the infrastructure in terms of transport connections, local facilities, to cope with development.
See attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11420
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs P.J. Jackson
I am opposed to any building on Green Belt land in Ingrave and Herongate. My reasons for doing so are environmental, not enough infrastructure, i.e. schooling doctors surgeries buses and shops, and also the extra traffic on the A128 which can now be dangerously busy
Re: Proposed building on Green Belt land.
I am writing to register the fact that I am opposed to any building on Green Belt land in Ingrave and Herongate. My reasons for doing so are environmental, not enough infrastructure, i.e. schooling doctors surgeries buses and shops, and also the extra traffic on the A128 which can now be dangerously busy.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11424
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Ronald Phillipson
I am aware of the pressure that Central Government is putting on Brentwood Council, I strongly urge you to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land, which offers fresh air and quiet recreation for everyone in Ingrave and Herongate. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and should be protected under Green Belt legislation.
There are more suitable places in the rest of the County and Country. England has become far too London and SE centred.
Any development around the two villages would suffer badly from a lack of general amenities (e.g. transport, schools, doctors, etc.).
Strategic Growth Options Plan (SGOP)
I am writing to comment on the proposed SGOP for Brentwood.
I have lived in the village of Ingrave for 53 years. During this time I have enjoyed countless walks in the fields and woods to the east of the A128 (NE, E and SE of the village). I am therefore very dismayed to see that all these areas appear to be under threat as part of the SGOP.
Whilst I am aware of the pressure that Central Government is (wrongly, I believe) putting on Brentwood Council, I strongly urge you to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land, which offers fresh air and quiet recreation for everyone in Ingrave and Herongate. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and should be protected under Green Belt legislation. I find it very difficult to believe that there aren't much more suitable places for housing developments in other parts of the County, not to mention large areas of the rest of the Country. England has become far too London and SE centred. This is not good in the long term.
In addition to the above, any development around the two villages would suffer badly from a lack of general amenities (e.g. transport, schools, doctors, etc.).
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11452
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs D Phillipson
Our family moved to Ingrave 53 years ago, the fields, woods and parks provide peaceful space away from towns and increasingly busy roads.
Disturbed that pressure is being made to find land to build thousands more houses, and I urge Brentwood Council to resist any development on Green Belt land. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources.
Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon already has inadequate amenities such as transport, schools, doctors etc. for the existing population. There would be significant additional infrastructure required.
Strategic Growth Options Plan (SGOP)
I write to comment on the SGOP for Brentwood. Our family moved to Ingrave 53 years ago and we have enjoyed the surrounding countryside during this time. The fields, woods and parks provide peaceful space away from towns and increasingly busy roads.
My understanding of the Green Belt legislation is that in 1957 the UK Government enshrined in law and promising that this green area surrounding London would be safeguarded as a valuable landscape and a national and historic environment.
I am very disturbed that pressure is being put upon Brentwood Borough Council to find land to build thousands more houses, and I urge Brentwood Council to resist any development on this precious Green Belt land. These green areas are also valuable agricultural resources and musty be protected under Green Belt legislation.
We are being pressured to increase housing in the South East and expand, and here in Herongate, Ingrave and West Horndon there are already inadequate amenities such as transport, schools, doctors etc. for the existing population. Surely the UK Government should be seeking land away from the crowded south east upon which to build further housing, plus the resulting infrastructure that will be required; and again, I urge Brentwood Borough Council to resist any development on our precious Green Belt land.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11673
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Blanche Dust
Object to development on this site.
Q1: Yes. My main concern is that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on households that border their land.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave
Q4: West Horndon.
Q5: Don't know.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes.
Q13: Schools, healthcare.
Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 11694
Received: 11/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Dust
Object to development on this site.
Q1: Yes. I am concerned that by allowing landowners of Green Belt sites to put forward their land for inclusion in the Plan, it will put a blight on properties that border their land.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Don't agree to the following sites in the Plan:
028 A/B/C Land East of Running Waters, Brentwood
067 A/B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
146 Land adjacent to Hillcrest Nursery
192 Heron Hall, Herongate
183 Former sewage pumping station, Ingrave Hall, Ingrave
Q4: West Horndon.
Q5: Don't know.
Q6: Develop brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5
Other - Public Footpaths: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes.
Q13: Schools, healthcare.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 12694
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
SHLAA recognised that land at Salmonds Grove [site ref 067A] is suitable, available and achievable and could deliver 44 dwellings within years 1-5. Site has good connection with the village and transport links.
Site is available for residential development and achievable albeit constrained by recommendation that only western part of site [067A] is developed (approx. 30% of total site). Proposed layout plan is attached.
Council has deficient five year housing land supply. It is important to balance strategic allocations with smaller sites with few constraints that can be delivered quickly, such as land at Salmonds Grove [067A].
See attached.