042 Land at Bell Mead, Ingatestone
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 5773
Received: 26/02/2015
Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council
We understand the land has been sold and plans are awaited from the developer. We trust that the proposals will be based on the ideas put forward at the 2 seminars we attended with BBC, our Ward Councillors and the developers with provision for 14 homes and 10 car parking spaces.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 6021
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Cllr Jon Cloke
Agree
Specifcally within Ingatestone, Fryerning & Mountnessing Ward:
Residential:
018 Thoby Priory - Agree
042 Bell Mead - Agree
057A & B Meadowside - Object - Greenbelt
064 Everglades - Already developed
073 Adjacent to Primary School - Object- Access & Greenbelt
078 Parklands - Object - Greenbelt
078A/B/C - Object - Coalescence/Greenbelt & Effect of A12 noise ( see Planning Decisions relating to Malyons Yard, Roman Road Officer's comments.)
094 No.375 to 361 Roman Road - Agree Greenbelt infill.
095A & B Water Meadows - Object - Green Belt & Village Amenity
098 Ingleton House - Object - OK in principle but where will you move the OAPs too, there is nothing else in the village.
105 No.339 to 361 Roman Road - Agree Greenbelt infill
106 Land adjacent to Ingatestone Garden Centre - Object- as agreed at exit of Brentwood Depositories and temporary use for A12 works to be returned to Greenbelt (and regrassed over). Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
107 Land at Mountnessing Roundabout. - Agree "Brownfield"
128 Ingatestone Garden Centre (In Mountnessing) - Strongly object - current use is Brownfield but on a Green belt site. Coalescence.Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
136 Land at Church Crescent - Agree
142 Land NE Thoby Farm, St. Anne's Road - Agrre - Farm buildings
153 Land to South Fryerning Lane -Object Strongly - Greenbelt, Prescence of Public Footpath through plot, Traffic outside Infants School almost opposite is already a nightmare. Two Cottages opposite the plot have benn compulsory purchased by Highways agency for A12 widening, the same would apply to this plot. Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
225 Nutshell, Stock Lane - Agree
GT005 Poplar's Farm Roman Road Ingatestone? According to the OS map this lies in Margaretting Parish?
GT015 Roman Triangle - Decision already made
GT016 Willow Farm - Agree subject to S106 agreement currently under discussion.
Commercial:
079C - Agree - Old Chelmsford Borough Tip site, Highways Agency depot & Currently leased to company working on A12.
106 - Object-Land adjacent to Ingatestone Garden Centre - Object- as agreed at exit of Brentwood Depositories and temporary use for A12 works to be returned to Greenbelt (and regrassed over).
107 - Land at Mountnessing Roundabout - Agree
Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 6122
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Janet Cowing
The main problem in Brentwood is traffic, especially into the town centre from the A12. Large development sites will exacerbate this. Some smaller sites appear sustainable eg 42, 018, 153, 078abc, 225, 128 and the Thoby Lane site 018 - as it will not impact on any surrounding housing and following the fire last summer, would seem an ideal choice.
see attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9665
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Nicholas Ashton
042 Has planning permission but has not been developed so much for 'urgent need'.
Q1: No - I and most people I speak to see no pressing need for growth in Brentwood, we feel this is being thrust upon us by central government. If there was local planning autonomy the concept would be thrown out.
Q2: No - Too much Green Belt areas that the Council have chosen to call 'grazing'.
Q3: Yes - 107 could be residential. 042 Has planning permission but has not been developed so much for 'urgent need'. The housing proposal for the Crown, Ingatestone seemed reasonable with good parking facilities. The Parish Council appeared even.
Q5: No - There is a need for villages to keep identity and not become a ribbon sprawl.
Q6: Brownfield only yes/no boxes not valid for multiple options.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes - Oh for Brentwood to be more like Chelmsford.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 2
Q11: What a silly presentation how can these be 'occasional' or 'frequent'? Was somebody paid to produce this?