POLICY R26: LAND NORTH OF ORCHARD PIECE
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26464
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Karen York
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited.
Please refer to the plan put together by BVHA
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26467
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Cllr Roger Keeble
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. Limited employment opportunities in the village. No consideration of the developments in neighbouring authorities. The original draft Plan discounted Blackmore as it did not align with the councils strategy, and this has not changed.
The moving of 25 and R26 sites out of the LDP could be mitigated by increasing the numbers of properties built at Dunton Garden Village. This occurred with the transfer of 260 properties to DGV in amendment I of the extraordinary council on 8th November 2018. This was done because the access to the properties down Honeypot Lane which is bounded by historical hedges, deep ditches and no change of a pavement for pedestrians. 70 houses could be included into the urban area by increasing density of development in areas where both transport and employment lines are far superior to R25 and R26.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26493
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Surinder Panesar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Impact on natural environment including increased flooding risk and going against the purpose of the Green Belt.
Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP and planners should refer to the BVHA neighbourhood Plan which clearly sets out the local housing needs, for our already sustainable community.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26494
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Annabelle Panesar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site allocations are inappropriate.
Site R25 and R26 to be removed. BVHA neighbourhood Plan sets out the local housing needs, that are sustainable.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26499
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Linda Watkinson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Site is in the green belt. Development should be focused in more sustainable areas, and not in areas like Blackmore which is in the greenbelt. Local services and infrastructure are at full capacity - school, GP surgery, roads, drainages, sewage utilities. Limited public transport.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26502
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Lesley Whan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Local services and infrastructure are already at capacity - school, GP surgery, limited parking. Area is prone to flooding. Site is green belt.
The road system in inadequate - major changes would have to be made. Realising he pressure that local councils are facing with direct figures in new builds. Surely, less greenbelt area can be found. The area regularly suffers power cuts therefore a major upgrade would be necessary. Similarly, water pressure is extremely low therefore there would be a major impact on the local population. An extension, or new build, would have to be made at Blackmore Primary School. In conclusion therefore what would be the best for the above, and some of the others that haven't been mentioned. Who would fit the bill?
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26507
Received: 29/05/2019
Respondent: Mr John Fowles
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The plan is unsound, not legally compliant and fails to comply with the duty to cooperate. yet again green belt is being developed on. Blackmore struggles to deal with the amount of traffic and parking and will not cope with the new development. Doctors surgeries, schools, public amenities are already at breaking point, how will they cope. Increased risk of flooding.
Withdraw the plan as it stands. Consider brownfield sites ,in fills and derelict properties.
Use parish council to communicate with the residents. Establish a realistic proposal via the residents/parish council
The plan is unsound, not legally compliant and fails to comply with the duty to cooperate. yet again green belt is being developed on. Blackmore struggles to deal with the amount of traffic and parking and will not cope with the new development. Doctors surgeries, schools, public amenities are already at breaking point, how will they cope. Increased risk of flooding
Withdraw the plan as it stands. Consider brownfield sites ,in fills and derelict properties.
Use parish council to communicate with the residents. Establish a realistic proposal via the residents/parish council
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26573
Received: 08/11/2019
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Gunthardt
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Our objections to the proposed development reflected the general views expressed by our Parish Council and those of a large proportion of the Village population. We feel strongly that the proposed development including the latest revised LDP would negatively impact on the unique character of the Blackmore Village and put undue strain on its already strained infrastructure and services including traffic and parking facilities, access to the local school, lack of adequate medical facilities, flooding etc. We also understand that there are now plans to build a further 70 properties just outside our borough which will cause further strain on the resources and infrastructure of our village. We fully support the efforts and views expressed by our local Parish Council. We trust that you will fully take into account of the views expressed by the residents of our village.
Remove sites R25 and R26 from the plan
Any way, our objections to the proposed development reflected the general views expressed by our Parish Council and those of a large proportion of the Village population. We feel strongly that the proposed development including the latest revised LDP would negatively impact on the unique character of the Blackmore Village and put undue strain on its already strained infrastructure and services including traffic and parking facilities, access to the local school, lack of adequate medical facilities, flooding etc. We also understand that there are now plans to build a further 70 properties just outside our borough which will cause further strain on the resources and infrastructure of our village. We fully support the efforts and views expressed by our local Parish Council. We trust that you will fully take into account of the views expressed by the residents of our village.