POLICY R25: LAND NORTH OF WOOLLARD WAY
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26393
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr John Adkins
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Adding 70 houses to the village is excessive - to share the existing shop, schools etc it does not take into account the 30+ houses being built by Epping Forest Council outside our village but will all expect to be 'serviced' by the existing village. Not possible unless we can ban them from using our facilities
Offset the number of houses by 30 (the number being built by Epping Forest Council next to our village) so 70-30=40 absolutely maximum.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26397
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Anne Adkins
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Not legally compliant. No consultation.
Remove R25 & R26. Consult local needs.
Not legally compliant. No consultation. Remove R25 & R26. Consult local needs.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26400
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Elizabeth Arthur
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Plan is completely unsound. Site is in Green Belt, only brownfield sites should ever be considered. Traffic access via Blackmore is already compromised with poor parking, narrow lane and busy. A huge increase of local traffic will make the village a car park. Infrastructure is suited to a small village, not such an increase in population. Flooding: our roads are already compromised by filed run off, more houses will cause considerable damage to property.
A far more in depth study of other suitable options to provide housing.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26402
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Mandy Anthony
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Unsound. No demonstration of how flooding or general infrastructure will be dealt with. Blackmore cannot cope with this number of houses: schools are busy and I haven't seen anything that proves new problems will be managed.
Would like to see what plans have been prepared to consider: - flood risk - safety issue relating to increased traffic - how this plan has been drafted in line with other regions, e.g. Epping houses being built at Fingrith Hall Lane - show the housing needs survey - sustainable plan for Blackmore.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26409
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Ella Bradley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Local services and infrastructure - schools, doctors surgery, parking, drainage, roads - unable to cope.
I really can't see what modifications could be considered in view of the infrastructure of the village. In view of my previous comments - the potential flooding - the narrow lanes - the parking - schools, doctors at full capacity.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26411
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr. Gordon John Beman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
All local services and infrastructure is at capacity - roads, drainage, schools, doctor surgery, parking, shop. Area is prone to flooding.
Plots R25 and R26 should both be removed from the LDP on two points. 1. We already have several plots under consideration for development by property developers both in and surrounding areas. 2. BBC have chosen to ignore several suitable sites for development including neglected "brownfield options".
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26413
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr. Robert Beeching
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
No consideration of developments in other neighbouring authorities. Local schools and medical facilities are at capacity. Flooding issues.
Green belt land should be developed as a last resort - there are plenty of other sites in around Brentwood where better facilities exist.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26415
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Peter Burgess
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Local services and infrastructure are at capacity - school, doctors surgery, parking. Area prone to flooding. No housing needs survey done.
Please refer to the BVHA Neighbourhood Plan
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26418
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Margaret Boreham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Local services and infrastructure are at capacity - school, doctors surgery, parking. Area prone to flooding. No housing needs survey done.
scrap it
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26421
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr David Baines
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Local services and infrastructure are at capacity - school, doctors surgery, parking. Area prone to flooding. No housing needs survey done. More suitable locations elsewhere. Lack of consideration of village needs.
Consider the local needs as outlined by the BVHA plan.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26430
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Rachel Caward
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Blackmore services and infrastructure - roads, drainage, parking, schools, doctor surgery - are already at capacity and cannot accommodation any additional people / dwellings.
Remove and drastically reduce the number of proposed houses in Blackmore to a maximum of 5. The infrastructure would have to be greatly improved with roads into the village being improved. School places would need to be found without having to drive to another part of Brentwood thus increasing pollution. A new GP Surgery would be needed as the only one in the village is under substantial pressure with waiting time for appointments at up to 3 weeks. Links for the villages via public transport would need to be sufficient for the ageing population.
See Attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26433
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Lee Caward
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Blackmore services and infrastructure - roads, drainage, parking, schools, doctor surgery - are already at capacity and cannot accommodation any additional people / dwellings.
Remove and drastically reduce the number of proposed houses in Blackmore to a maximum of 5. The infrastructure would have to be greatly improved with roads into the village being improved. School places would need to be found without having to drive to another part of Brentwood thus increasing pollution. A new GP Surgery would be needed as the only one in the village is under substantial pressure with waiting time for appointments at up to 3 weeks. Links for the villages via public transport would need to be sufficient for the ageing population.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26441
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Timothy Hogan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
Blackmore seems to have been chosen by developers rather than BBC as other non-greenbelt sites are available in Stondon Massey and surrounds. Remove R25 and R26 from the LDP and consult BVHA local neighbourhood plan.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26446
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Wendy Dunbar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
Site R25 and R26 to be removed from the LDP and Planners to refer to the BVHA neighbourhood plan which details the local housing needs, etc.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26448
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Reginald Dawson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
No housing need surgery completed. Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
Remove and drastically reduce the number of houses in Blackmore to a maximum of 5. Infrastructure would have to be dramatically improved with improved roads into the Village. School places would need to be found without increasing the need to drive to another village or Brentwood thus increasing pollution in the area. The single doctor surgery which supports all 5 parishes is already under immense pressure with waiting ties for an appointment already standing at up to 3 weeks. A new doctors surgery or funding for more doctors would be required. Current transport links for the villages would need to be guaranteed to be sufficient for the aging population.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26450
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Lewis Pincombe
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited.
use local other brownfield site in the area before using green belt land. Simple.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26452
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Lindsey Pavitt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
No housing need surgery completed. Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
The Local Plan needs modifying to consider other local areas suitable for development in the Brentwood locality. The Local Plan also has to be reviewed to consider other development in progress of 30 or more houses within 2 miles of Blackmore which will put more pressure on the village roads and amenities. Where will children from the existing new development and the proposed development go to school ? Can roads within and around Blackmore cope with considerably more traffic? The existing roads are narrow, in a poor condition and with pot holes at the sides already. Areas in the village which already, or in the past, have flooded quite seriously must surely be considered before more houses are built.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26454
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Anthony Pavitt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
No housing need surgery completed. Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
The Local Plan needs modifying to consider other local areas suitable for development in the Brentwood locality. The Local Plan also has to be reviewed to consider other development in progress of 30 or more houses within 2 miles of Blackmore which will put more pressure on the village roads and amenities. Where will children from the existing new development and the proposed development go to school ? Can roads within and around Blackmore cope with considerably more traffic? The existing roads are narrow, in a poor condition and with pot holes at the sides already. Areas in the village which already, or in the past, have flooded quite seriously must surely be considered before more houses are built.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26459
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mr John Orbell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
No housing need surgery completed. Site is greenbelt and should not be built on. The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. No consultation with the local community and no consideration of developments within neighbouring authorities.
Sites R25 and R26 be removed from the LDP Plan. You need to refer to he Blackmore Village Heritage Association for our Local Housing Needs for our sustainable community. We do not want unwanted and unjustified large scale development. There has been no 'Housing Needs Survey' to demonstrate why Blackmore is included in the LDP. Was is not the Brentwood Borough Council who said "we will continue to protect our key assets including the environment, heritage and character of the borough".
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26463
Received: 12/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Karen York
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited.
Please refer to the plan put together by BVHA
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26466
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Cllr Roger Keeble
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The area is prone to flooding and will be worsened if the development goes forward. The local services and infrastructure - school, doctor surgery, roads, drainage, parking - are already at capacity. Public transport is very limited. Limited employment opportunities in the village. No consideration of the developments in neighbouring authorities. The original draft Plan discounted Blackmore as it did not align with the councils strategy, and this has not changed.
The moving of 25 and R26 sites out of the LDP could be mitigated by increasing the numbers of properties built at Dunton Garden Village. This occurred with the transfer of 260 properties to DGV in amendment I of the extraordinary council on 8th November 2018. This was done because the access to the properties down Honeypot Lane which is bounded by historical hedges, deep ditches and no change of a pavement for pedestrians. 70 houses could be included into the urban area by increasing density of development in areas where both transport and employment lines are far superior to R25 and R26.
See attached
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26492
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr Surinder Panesar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Impact on natural environment including increased flooding risk and going against the purpose of the Green Belt.
Site R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP and planners should refer to the BVHA neighbourhood Plan which clearly sets out the local housing needs, for our already sustainable community.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26495
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Annabelle Panesar
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
site allocations are inappropriate.
Site R25 and R26 to be removed. BVHA neighbourhood Plan sets out the local housing needs, that are sustainable.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26498
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mrs Linda Watkinson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Site is in the green belt. Development should be focused in more sustainable areas, and not in areas like Blackmore which is in the greenbelt. Local services and infrastructure are at full capacity - school, GP surgery, roads, drainages, sewage utilities. Limited public transport.
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26501
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Ms Lesley Whan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Local services and infrastructure are already at capacity - school, GP surgery, limited parking. Area is prone to flooding. Site is green belt.
The road system in inadequate - major changes would have to be made. Realising he pressure that local councils are facing with direct figures in new builds. Surely, less greenbelt area can be found. The area regularly suffers power cuts therefore a major upgrade would be necessary. Similarly, water pressure is extremely low therefore there would be a major impact on the local population. An extension, or new build, would have to be made at Blackmore Primary School. In conclusion therefore what would be the best for the above, and some of the others that haven't been mentioned. Who would fit the bill?
See attached.
Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 26572
Received: 08/11/2019
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Gunthardt
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Our objections to the proposed development reflected the general views expressed by our Parish Council and those of a large proportion of the Village population. We feel strongly that the proposed development including the latest revised LDP would negatively impact on the unique character of the Blackmore Village and put undue strain on its already strained infrastructure and services including traffic and parking facilities, access to the local school, lack of adequate medical facilities, flooding etc. We also understand that there are now plans to build a further 70 properties just outside our borough which will cause further strain on the resources and infrastructure of our village. We fully support the efforts and views expressed by our local Parish Council. We trust that you will fully take into account of the views expressed by the residents of our village.
Remove sites R25 and R26 from the plan
Any way, our objections to the proposed development reflected the general views expressed by our Parish Council and those of a large proportion of the Village population. We feel strongly that the proposed development including the latest revised LDP would negatively impact on the unique character of the Blackmore Village and put undue strain on its already strained infrastructure and services including traffic and parking facilities, access to the local school, lack of adequate medical facilities, flooding etc. We also understand that there are now plans to build a further 70 properties just outside our borough which will cause further strain on the resources and infrastructure of our village. We fully support the efforts and views expressed by our local Parish Council. We trust that you will fully take into account of the views expressed by the residents of our village.