Object

Representation ID: 4034

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Sheila Flunder

Chep Pallets (Peri site) Warley Street - This site is currently a transport depot and the Strategic Growth Options document does not seem to show any different proposed usage, which I support, however some years back the site was suggested to the Council as a possible housing site. A joint meeting of the Great Warley and Little Warley residents was organised by the Great Warley Conservation Society. The proposal was thoroughly discuss and was overwhelmingly rejected in a vote.
I would add the site is unsuitable for housing being too remote from services and facilities, and would necessitate considerable car use, as well as not being in accord with the Council chosen Spatial Strategy. In addition, the sheer size of the site would, if developed, be harmful to the character of Great Warley.
The site has also been mentioned at some stage as a possible Gypsy site to which I wish to register my objection as this would be incompatible with its existing use.

Object

Representation ID: 4038

Received: 11/02/2015

Respondent: Peter and Barbara James

Number of people: 2

Chep Pallets Warley Street (Peri Site) is also listed in the Strategic Growth Options document, and although we are not aware that it has been suggested to the Council as a possible housing site within the last few years, some years back this possibility was discussed at a joint meeting of Great Warley and Little Warley residents called the GWCS Committee, and the proposal was overwhelmingly defeated in the vote taken at the end of that meeting.
We would like to formally object with this current consultation to this site ever being considered for housing, since its remoteness make it unsustainable, and the size of any development would be harmful to the existing character of Great Warley.
We believe the Chep site has also been suggested at some stage as a Gypsy Traveller site. We would like to register our objection to this possibility since we think such use would be incompatible with the current use as a logistics distribution site.

Comment

Representation ID: 5094

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Cllr Jill Hubbard

Not in accordance with the Counci's current Spatial Strategy. Overwhelmingly rejected by The Great Warley Conservation Society and local residents. It is remote from services and facilities and would require constant use of cars to access any
sevices in Brentwood or beyond. Previously rejected under SHLAA exercise; discounted as does not meet Spatial Strategy to protect green-belt due to remote location.

Support

Representation ID: 5137

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: PERI UK

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

Comments made supporting employment development at LDP site ref 228 (Chep Pallets, Warley Street). See response to question 7 for details [REP ID 5130].

Object

Representation ID: 6904

Received: 17/02/2014

Respondent: Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) Brentwood Branch

Site is completely surrounded by Green Belt land and adjacent Special Landscape Area, all of which would be adversely impaired by development. The site has an open aspect character which minimises current impact on surroundings. The site is also an important location for employment.