brentwood.gov.uk

Q1: No - I and most people I speak to see no pressing need for growth in Brentwood, we feel this is being thrust upon us by central government. If there was local planning autonomy the concept would be thrown out.

Q2: No - Too much Green Belt areas that the Council have chosen to call 'grazing'.

Q3: Yes - 107 could be residential. 042 Has planning permission but has not been developed so much for 'urgent need'. The housing proposal for the Crown, Ingatestone seemed reasonable with good parking facilities. The Parish Council appeared even.

Q5: No - There is a need for villages to keep identity and not become a ribbon sprawl.

Q6: Brownfield only yes/no boxes not valid for multiple options.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes - Oh for Brentwood to be more like Chelmsford.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 4
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 2

Q11: What a silly presentation how can these be 'occasional' or 'frequent'? Was somebody paid to produce this?