brentwood.gov.uk

Q1: Yes - However I am totally against the use of any Green Belt land.

Q2: No - The present A127 is inadequate for the volume of rush hour traffic as is the C2C service and parking at West Horndon station and you will remember we have had our flooding problems.

Q3: Yes - Why should the south side of Brentwood be singled out for expansion and not the A127 corridor?

Q4: I would like to point out that should the WH brownfield site be used for development the existing company (if moved) would find it very difficult to replace staff as many come by train.

Q5: I suggest they should be treated equally to the A127 corridor.

Q6: As commented earlier the Green Belt/ Greenfield sites were set to prevent urban sprawl.

Q7: Think this is covered by previous comments.

Q8: In the case of West Horndon, although Brentwood rate payers we have no reliable bus service and exorbitant parking charges in the Town Centre compared to parts of Havering.

Q9: No

Q10:
Scenic Beauty / Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 3
Historic Interest: 3
Strategic road needs regular maintenance in view of its use: 4

Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial buildings: 3
Nature reserves / wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 2
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land: 0
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Other - School, church, village hall, doctors surgery: 4

Q12: The reasons of quality of life of a village be uppermost reason for their move here.

Q13: Expenditure essential if flooding and sewage are to be avoided with the increased housing along A127 corridor, the overcrowding of doctors surgery and the maintenance of the existing flood relief scheme.