Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29974
Received: 27/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Daniel Dean
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Two sites R25 and R26 should never have been included in the LDP. There are no exceptional reasons for inclusion but many for not.
1. Land is of good farming quality. As demonstrated by active farming in the area.
2. The fields currently provide some protection as a soak away for rainwater and run off. Helping to prevent exacerbation of existing flooding episodes within the village. Building on this land will put the village at risk of increased flooding.
3. Existing limited and already overloaded infrastructure and sewage system will be adversely affected.
4. Rural road network safety compromised by increase in traffic as there is limited work and public transport opportunities.
Therefore the inclusion of these sites does not meet the vision of BBC or the NPPF.
See attached representation