Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10207

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Raymond and Valerie Gilbey

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

Q1: Yes - For the purpose of breaking down into more manageable areas.

Q2: Yes - But with reservations, brownland that's Green Belt land should not be released because it cause misuse of land for building.

Q3: Yes - 143 Land east of Peartree Lane and north of Peartree Close access to these dwellings would be via Peartree Lane and Lime Grove, this means that there will be substantially more traffic on our quiet roads along with significant noise and light pollution from the dwellings.

Q4: The Dunton Garden Suburb make sense got all amenities without effecting the neighbourhood.

Q5: Yes - Within reason the A12 corridor has a number of areas that could be developed.

Q6: This is not a good option and it will destroy the character of the village that surrounds of Brentwood.

Q7: Yes - If its on the M25/A127 but away from minor roads which are already in poor state of repair.

Q8: Yes - Brentwood Town Centre needs much better shops if its to justify the expensive parking as Lakeside parking is free.

Q9: No - In the area were farms and walkways foot paths, on foot is not issue.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: No - What about broadband or power supplies the area has very bad reception for broadband.

Q13: The infrastructure should be funded on houses being built and spent on the area being developed not other areas.

Attachments: