brentwood.gov.uk

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes - In general I consider that any use of Green Belt for housing must be rigidly restricted to a base minimum. In particular I object to the use of sites 143, 224, 185, 070, 019 and 185. Due to the lack of infrastructure including transport link, water sewage as well as school places in Doddinghurst area. It would seem inappropriate to include these areas in the "Strategic Growth Options" Plan.

Q4: Site 200 Dunton Garden Suburb.

Q5: No - As previously stated any infringement of Green Belt must be strictly limited.

Q6: Not happy with either proposal.

Q7: No comment.

Q8: Yes - Careful consideration needs to be given to the retail development in the town centre. At present there are too many pubs and eating places. There is a real need for a greater variety of individual shops.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility:5
Value of village community: 5

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: No - Has sufficient consideration been given to the size and condition of the roads generally in the area with the inevitable increase in the volume of traffic that would ensue.

Q13: Roads, schools, sewage, water, gas and electricity supplies.
Other comments: Having lived in Doddinghurst for many years and noticed the increase in traffic, schools places, housing, etc since we first moved here it would be detrimental to village life and surrounding areas should there be further building development in this area.