Object

Representation ID: 1621

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I object to the traveller provision in the plan for the following reasons:
1. the Councils traveller count is wrong
2. the new plans will not help the situation currently being expereinced.
3. the traveller site is on gb land which should be used for agricultural purposes.

The council is not respecting the interests of Brentwood residents.

Object

Representation ID: 1622

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

We must take control over where and the way they live (travellers) rather than making all their own rules whilst not contributing to our village life.

Object

Representation ID: 1623

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I object to Traveller provisions in the plan for the following reasons:
1. There are too many travellers in Navestock. We have had to cope with rubbish in our lanes, sewage in the ditches, etc. the councils plan will do nothing to stop this but only make it worse.
2. The travellers site does not meet the necessary criteria because it is not near shops, schools, healthcare or public transport.
3. The site is on gb land which should only be used for agricultural purposes.

The council is not respecting the interests of Brentwood residents.

Object

Representation ID: 1630

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I object to Travellers provision contained in the draft LDP because it does not seem to allow for travellers currently living in Navestock, let alone the larger Brentwood area. According to the 2012 Monitoring report there was 96 sites, which if they only have 2 pitches each means that there is a need for at least 192 pitches. Allowing 44 pitches, which includes a 5 year forward pitch provision- doesnt make any sense? We are constantly told that Navestock travellers could not be moved on because Brentwood has no allocated sites- how is this new lack fo provision any better?

Object

Representation ID: 1633

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

Over the last few years so many travellers have moved into Navestock, that they now outnumber us villagers. We have endured rubbish being dumped on our verges, sewage in our ditches. the flouting of planning rules, trepass, theft, abuse, intimidation and now a shooting.

Furthermore, BBC provide an inaccurate counting of pitches- anyone driving through Navestock for 5 minutes can see there are far more than BBC says. The Council should remove all the illegal sites in Navestock and not tuen any into legal sites.

Object

Representation ID: 1646

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I live on Horseman Side in close proximity to the gypsy site. I cannot see that a permenant site aids travellers nomadic lifestyle. Sites should be smaller, so that the residents can become part of the community. Navestock has had a gypsy site for 50 years and fmily members being part of the working and social life of the community.

The Horseman site has harmed the green belt, has no access to services and facilities, it harms the character of the area and is not designed or landscaped to minimise the impact.

Object

Representation ID: 1648

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

We object to the travellers provision in the plan for the following reasons:
1. We are in close proximity to the site and therefore experience noise, litter, sewage as a result of human waste dumped into he ditches rather than being exposed of in a sanitary way.

Overall we feel that brentwood council does not respect our position and does not enforce against the travellers.

Object

Representation ID: 1650

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I object to BBC's proposed travellers provision in the local plan. The sites being considered will cause (and have already caused) unacceptable harm to the gb land. One of the proposed sites - Hope Farm on Horsemanside is fast acelerating into the next Crays Hill. In the LDP, the councils count of the current number of gypsies living in Navestock is grossly inaccurate. It is common knowledge that the number of travellers in the Parish now vastly outnumber the settled residents.

What we need is a workableframework to prevent further encroachment and remove travellers living illegally from Navestock.

Object

Representation ID: 1651

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

I object to traveller sites in the Navestock area. I think there are too many. They just buy a field and the next thing its concrete plots. Which at the time are illegal (with no planning permission) they seem to do what they like an the council seems afraid of them.

Object

Representation ID: 1652

Received: 01/10/2013

Respondent: C/O Navestock Parish Council

i object for the following reasons:

1. The sites which are being give onsideration are agricultural use and will destroy green belt by being tarmacked over.
2. the curent sites at Navestock are not applicable as they are not near shops, services an transport.
3. the council will not confirm the actual number of travellers because there are more than the local community.