Comment

Representation ID: 876

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Comments provided on each proposed site allocation on attached RAG spread sheet.

Comments provided for when sewers cross sites, in which case the site layout should be designed to take this into account. Appropriate locations and process suggested in attached response.

Comments on surface water disposal measures and inclusion of SUDS.

Support

Representation ID: 877

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

We are particularly supportive of Policies DM35: Flood Risk, DM36: Sustainable Drainage.

Support

Representation ID: 878

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

We are particularly supportive of Policies DM35: Flood Risk, DM36: Sustainable Drainage.

Support

Representation ID: 879

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

We support the strategic objective SO2 and would want to see policy to ensure necessary infrastructure to serve allocations is planned (and in place) before development proceeds (and dwellings occupied) and to follow on from this we would at planning consent stage request the use of appropriate conditions to ensure infrastructure is in place before development is connected to the public system.

Comment

Representation ID: 880

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

In regard to Policy CP14 (b) Anglian Water would suggest sustainable drainage should be applied on every development to its maximum potential and would therefore amend the policy so that the section ("particularly in critical drainage areas") is removed.

Support

Representation ID: 881

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Support this policy stipulating "..will require all new development to meet on and off site infrastructure requirements necessary to support development proposals and mitigate their impacts".

Comment

Representation ID: 883

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Funding of infrastructure, foul wastewater infrastructure requirements would be dependent on development location, size and phasing. All sites will require local connection to the existing network (may include upgrades). Local connections and sewer reinforcements would be funded by developers through provisions of the Water Industry Act (1991). The statutory undertaker is responsible for any necessary upgrades to Sewage Treatment Works.

Infrastructure funding will be managed within the Act and will not be required to form part of CIL. Surface water management is managed in accordance with Building Regs part H and NPPF Technical Guidance (may require CIL or s106 contributions).

Comment

Representation ID: 3347

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Comments provided on each proposed site allocation on attached RAG spread sheet.

Comments provided for when sewers cross sites, in which case the site layout should be designed to take this into account. Appropriate locations and process suggested in attached response.

Comments on surface water disposal measures and inclusion of SUDS.

Comment

Representation ID: 3348

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Comments provided on each proposed site allocation on attached RAG spread sheet.

Comments provided for when sewers cross sites, in which case the site layout should be designed to take this into account. Appropriate locations and process suggested in attached response.

Comments on surface water disposal measures and inclusion of SUDS.

Comment

Representation ID: 3349

Received: 26/09/2013

Respondent: Anglian Water

Comments provided on each proposed site allocation on attached RAG spread sheet.

Comments provided for when sewers cross sites, in which case the site layout should be designed to take this into account. Appropriate locations and process suggested in attached response.

Comments on surface water disposal measures and inclusion of SUDS.