079A Land adjacent to Ingatestone by-pass (part bounded by Roman Road)

Showing comments and forms 1 to 10 of 10

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 4593

Received: 02/02/2015

Respondent: Mr David Lawn

Representation Summary:

One of the fundamental purposes of the Green Belt is to prevent the coalescence of settlements within it. Ingatestone and Mountnessing are currently discrete settlements. Site 079A would completely change the character of the gateway into Ingatestone from all three routes into it. If 079B were included the effect would further reduce the separation.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 5648

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Miss Hollie Stacey

Representation Summary:

Land in this area would not be suitable for development as it would lead to coalescence between Mountnessing and Ingatestone which should be retained as two separate villages. It is vital that greenery should be retained as a buffer between the A12 and future housing development.

Full text:

Mountnessing currently suffers from water/sewage systems that are currently at capacity - any further development in the village will need to see major work on the infrastructure to ensure existing residents are not further impacted.

There is a need for smaller 1/2 bed affordable properties in Mountnessing particularly for elderly residents who wish to downsize and free up larger homes.

The village envelope should be investigated as there has recently been proposals for appropriate infill development that have been rejected due to being located 'outside of the village boundary' when it actual fact, most residents would consider the village to be a lot longer than is currently classified. Mountnessing would begin at Lower Road and end up towards the slip road on to the A12. The Council has recently turned down several sensible planning applications for schemes that would more than like add to the village's street scene.

018 Thoby Priory
This site has been earmarked for development for many years and would be welcomed by many residents. It would be most suited to a development of family homes. Thought will need to be given to affordable housing provision as the site is quite remote from the rest of Mountnessing. Also, the impact on water/sewage services in the area would need to be taken into account.
Appropriate access arrangements will need to be made as the site is off a sharp bend where traffic flows at high speeds. Also, the impact on traffic flows at peak times at the top of Thoby Lane will need to be taken into account.

073 Land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School
This development has been vastly improved by the developers over the last year. They have come forward with a scheme of circa 18 family homes and have looked in great detail at the access arrangement off Crosby Close. This has the potential to be a well-designed development that fits in with the context of the local area.

079a/079b/079c Land adjacent to Ingatestone byass
Land in this area would not be suitable for development as it would lead to coalescence between Mountnessing and Ingatestone which should be retained as two separate villages. It is vital that greenery should be retained as a buffer between the A12 and future housing development.

094 Land between 375 and 361 Roman Road / 105 Land between 339 and 361 Roman Road
This would constitute appropriate infill development to Roman Road streetscene. As long as it is sympathetically designed to be in-keeping with other properties in the area, this would be in keeping with the ribbon of development that fronts Roman Road.

107 Mountnessing Roundabout
This site has been earmarked for development for many years. It is very pleasing to see that the developer's have moved away from what was a very oppressive-looking hotel scheme and are concentrating towards housing. Housing design should be in context with the rest of the village. Density is an issue on this site particularly as having 100+ cars accessing/exiting the development at peak time will most likely put a strain on the traffic at the roundabout.

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 5776

Received: 26/02/2015

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It is essential that a green space separation be maintained between Ingatestone and Mountnessing. Development on this site would therefore not be supported by the Parish Council and should be rejected.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 6027

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Cllr Jon Cloke

Representation Summary:

Coalescence/Greenbelt & Effect of A12 noise ( see Planning Decisions relating to Malyons Yard, Roman Road Officer's comments.)

Full text:

Specifcally within Ingatestone, Fryerning & Mountnessing Ward:
Residential:
018 Thoby Priory - Agree
042 Bell Mead - Agree
057A & B Meadowside - Object - Greenbelt
064 Everglades - Already developed
073 Adjacent to Primary School - Object- Access & Greenbelt
078 Parklands - Object - Greenbelt
078A/B/C - Object - Coalescence/Greenbelt & Effect of A12 noise ( see Planning Decisions relating to Malyons Yard, Roman Road Officer's comments.)
094 No.375 to 361 Roman Road - Agree Greenbelt infill.
095A & B Water Meadows - Object - Green Belt & Village Amenity
098 Ingleton House - Object - OK in principle but where will you move the OAPs too, there is nothing else in the village.
105 No.339 to 361 Roman Road - Agree Greenbelt infill
106 Land adjacent to Ingatestone Garden Centre - Object- as agreed at exit of Brentwood Depositories and temporary use for A12 works to be returned to Greenbelt (and regrassed over). Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
107 Land at Mountnessing Roundabout. - Agree "Brownfield"
128 Ingatestone Garden Centre (In Mountnessing) - Strongly object - current use is Brownfield but on a Green belt site. Coalescence.Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
136 Land at Church Crescent - Agree
142 Land NE Thoby Farm, St. Anne's Road - Agrre - Farm buildings
153 Land to South Fryerning Lane -Object Strongly - Greenbelt, Prescence of Public Footpath through plot, Traffic outside Infants School almost opposite is already a nightmare. Two Cottages opposite the plot have benn compulsory purchased by Highways agency for A12 widening, the same would apply to this plot. Refer also sound pollution and Malyon's Yard officer's comments.
225 Nutshell, Stock Lane - Agree
GT005 Poplar's Farm Roman Road Ingatestone? According to the OS map this lies in Margaretting Parish?
GT015 Roman Triangle - Decision already made
GT016 Willow Farm - Agree subject to S106 agreement currently under discussion.

Commercial:
079C - Agree - Old Chelmsford Borough Tip site, Highways Agency depot & Currently leased to company working on A12.
106 - Object-Land adjacent to Ingatestone Garden Centre - Object- as agreed at exit of Brentwood Depositories and temporary use for A12 works to be returned to Greenbelt (and regrassed over).
107 - Land at Mountnessing Roundabout - Agree

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 6125

Received: 16/02/2015

Respondent: Janet Cowing

Representation Summary:

The main problem in Brentwood is traffic, especially into the town centre from the A12. Large development sites will exacerbate this. Some smaller sites appear sustainable eg 42,018,153,078abc, {assumed error, and meant site 79} 225,128 and the Thoby Lane site 018 - as it will not impact on any surrounding housing and following the fire last summer, would seem an ideal choice.

Full text:

see attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11705

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Rebecca Gaymer

Number of people: 2

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Representation Summary:

Representations were made in response to the October 2013 Preferred Options consultation. We wish to highlight the benefits of poitential development on site 079A.
- the site is vacant scrubland.
- it is surrounded by the B1002, Ingatestone by-pass and existing residnetial properties. Creating a well contained parcel of land adjoining the settlement.
- the 2011 SHLAA (site G101B) desrbed it as being suitable, available and acheivable; for 41 dwellings.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11713

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Rebecca Gaymer

Number of people: 2

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Representation Summary:

The A12 corridor sites provide a logical opportunity to sustainably accommodate a proportion of the Borough's significant housing need in locations that are close to existing facilities, services and infrastructure. Such organic growth of existing settlements will provide opportunities to revitalise and enhance existing settlements by promoting additional investment and greater use of local facilities and businesses as a result of the increase in population. The developer contributions associated with the development of sustainable sites on the edge of existing settlements will mitigate the increased demands on local services and infrastructure.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11714

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Rebecca Gaymer

Number of people: 2

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Representation Summary:

The increased housing supply will provide much-needed stability to the housing market and make it more affordable for local residents to live in the A12 corridor area.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11724

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Rebecca Gaymer

Number of people: 2

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Representation Summary:

In the case of Site 153, we consider that this presents an opportunity for logical infilling of a vacant gap between the properties to the south of Fryerning Lane and the A12, giving an opportunity to adjust the current extent of the Green Belt to meet housing needs whilst providing a long term defensible boundary in line with the NPPF.

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 11735

Received: 20/04/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John and Rebecca Gaymer

Number of people: 2

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Representation Summary:

Site 079A (land adjacent to Ingatestone Bypass, part bounded by Roman Road) - is suitable for residential use

Full text:

See attached.

Attachments: