Support

Representation ID: 29806

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery

Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN

Proposals Map Site R07: The amended site plan taking the Ongar Road out of the green belt as discussed at the Hearing Session is supported.

Support

Representation ID: 29809

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Heather Dunbar

Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN

Proposals Map Site R07: The amended site plan taking the Ongar Road out of the green belt as discussed at the Hearing Session is supported.

Support

Representation ID: 29813

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery

Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN

Proposals Map Site R07: The amended site plan taking the Ongar Road out of the green belt as discussed at the Hearing Session is supported.

Support

Representation ID: 29818

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Maxine Armiger

Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN

Proposals Map Site R07: The amended site plan taking the Ongar Road out of the green belt as discussed at the Hearing Session is supported.

Object

Representation ID: 29891

Received: 26/11/2021

Respondent: GL Hearn

Agent: GL Hearn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

The Tesco site at Sawyers Hall Farm is sustainably located within Central Brentwood Growth Corridor. The site can deliver 450 new homes within 5 years from the adoption of the Local Plan Review. Other benefits include:
- securing the future of the Hopefield Animal Sanctuary and the construction of new stables and a new visitor centre on site. Tesco will also transfer the freehold of an 50-acre farm, not too far from Brentwood to the Sanctuary at nil cost.
- parent/pupil drop-off/pick-up pointswithin the site allocation.
- improvements to Doddinghurst Road and Ongar Road.
- internal pedestrian and cycle routes.

Object

Representation ID: 30237

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: St Modwen Properties PLC and S&J Padfield and Partners

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Policies Map: St Modwen proposed to remove additional land from the Green Belt to accommodate a new link road, access from the B186, and landscaping enhancements. BBC proposed to remove this additional land in Document F89. However, no modifications to the extent of alterations to the Green Belt are proposed in relation to E11 in the Policies Map. Unclear why the Council has changed its position with regards to the amendments to the site boundary and further Green Belt release. Concerned that future decision makers could consider the aforementioned areas not to meet NPPF paragraph 150 and constitute inappropriate development

Object

Representation ID: 30261

Received: 30/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Terri Reed

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

BBC should reassess its Sustainability Appraisal with a view to looking at the present infrastructure, drainage, the destruction of Green Belt, our current public transport availability, over capacity of the school, impact of additional traffic from both the proposed sites and neighbouring developments.

Object

Representation ID: 30272

Received: 02/12/2021

Respondent: EA Strategic Land LLP

Agent: Iceni Projects Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Sustainability Appraisal:
Note that the SA Addendum (Sep 2021) identifies ‘strongly negative effects’ associated with the Main Modifications that result in the Plan not meeting the full OAN, as well as the particularly low housing supply that will result in the early years of the plan, which will result in worsening affordability. The SA suggests however that there is no alternative to this situation aside from significant delays to the adoption of the current plan. We consider that the most appropriate action would be to include additional sites now such as land West of West Horndon;
Object to the assertion in Box 1.1 of the SA that West Horndon could not deliver early in the Plan period. EASL have undertaken significant preparatory work already and ready to submit an application. The only constraint is the progress of the Local Plan. Delivery analysis indicates that first completions could be achieved in approximately 3 years from adoption of the Plan.

Object

Representation ID: 30273

Received: 02/12/2021

Respondent: EA Strategic Land LLP

Agent: Iceni Projects Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Sustainability Appraisal:
In our view the SA Addendum is not correct to indicate that MM10 to some extent mitigates the harm generated by the failure to meet the OAN in full, as the key issue is one of early delivery, which the review will not address. Therefore we do not consider that this strategy addresses the fundamental issues with housing delivery that we have raised, and it would not be positively prepared or justified.

Object

Representation ID: 30402

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Gerald Mountstevens

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

The Sustainability Appraisal (2.8.1) does not appear to consider the reality of the problem which has existed for many years. Only very major work on diverting the water would have to be undertaken at some considerable cost. Also the present concern of Climate Change damage must be taken into account and to cause environmental problems as are being experienced in other parts of the UK.

Object

Representation ID: 30407

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Mountstevens

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

The Sustainability Appraisal (2.8.1) does not appear to consider the reality of the problem which has existed for many years. Only very major work on diverting the water would have to be undertaken at some considerable cost. Also the present concern of Climate Change damage must be taken into account and to cause environmental problems as are being experienced in other parts of the UK.

Object

Representation ID: 30425

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Patricia Taylor

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Sustainability Appraisal - ‘Community and Wellbeing’ – There certainly are significant concerns from the villagers of Blackmore. We already have a sustainable and successful village. The proposal to build on these sites are developer-led and not for the improvement or benefit of the residents of Blackmore. Until now the Green Belt has been respected but, in order to fit in with government figures the fields are under what the residents consider to be a ‘threat’ of destruction. This is opportunistic development and not in the best interests of the residents of Blackmore.