Whilst I recognise that the borough requires significant housing development, potentially in line in numbers with that identified within the Local Plan 2015-2030, I strongly object to the proposed concentration of new dwellings, over a sustained period of time, within the identified West Horndon Opportunity Area.

The construction of 200-250 new dwellings within West Horndon, every year, for 15 years, will firstly expand the town beyond recognition. Based on the current population size (which is broadly stable), the proposals would see it essentially triple in size. Whilst there are proposals for improved infrastructure, it is questionable whether this is truly sustainable within the land area proposed. The density of construction required will not be in-fitting with this beautiful countryside location, where houses are two stories tall at most, with a significant proportion of bungalows. High rise or even medium rise flats are not at all in-fitting with current town character.

Secondly, as our council, Brentwood Borough Council has the obligation to serve existing residents, not just new ones. Those who have made West Horndon their home will see a material depression in their house values as the 200-250 new dwellings come on to the market. There will be no compensation to the existing residents, which feels highly inequitable for such a small population.

Thirdly. Whilst the attractions of expanding at West Horndon are clear, one must question market demand for 200-250 new dwellings each year, in the same place, over 15 years. This demand is unproven, and highly questionable. Is it right that just under half of individuals looking to live in the entire Brentwood Borough, will want to all live in the same place? In a completely new development? It is worth highlighting on this point that the newer, small sized dwellings completed within West Horndon more recently have struggled to sell, particularly those allocated as "affordable housing" (development in question: 191 Thorndon Avenue). Simply finding one place to build nearly half of the dwellings required by the Borough does not mean people will decide to live in them - they need to be in varied locations reflecting local demand.

Lastly, your plans to allocate the bulk of all required traveller sites to West Horndon again looks highly inequitable. I would also question suitability - West Horndon has been flagged as a key area for expansion due to its location to rail links; in essence, this is land prime for development for commuters and local business workers. Travellers, with limited ties to one location, do not have these requirements and indeed it is not clear why the same land so prime for employment and fixed residential communities, also makes sense for a traveller community.

Hence in summary, I strongly object to the proposal in its current form. West Horndon is a small village that whilst can accept a decent level of development, should not be targeted at such a level. It appears that it has been viewed as a fix for the entire borough, and indeed I fear that if these plans are bourn out you will end up with a bloated stock of houses in one location with limited demand vs. supply. The solution needs to provide housing where it is actually needed, and well balanced across the Borough. This proposal fails on both counts.

[see attached comment for further submission]

General Development Concerns
The only definite thing about Policy CP4 "West Horndon Opportunity Area" is a proposal for 1500 houses. The plans provide no further details other than outlines of the 3 target areas - sites 020, 021, and 037.

Policy DM28 "Gypsy and Traveller Provision" West Horndon mentions a Travellers' Site at West Horndon but no indication as to where.

In these circumstances it is difficult to make specific comments on such a major proposal. For these reasons and the reasons below I am rejecting both Policies CP4 and DM28.

Infrastructure
The plan has no infrastructure change details. Just a general statement to the effect that necessary infrastructure changes can be made.

The existing infrastructure serving West Horndon is insufficient at this present time to cope with the existing village needs. It is difficult to see how the extra development can be supported when the major infrastructure changes that are required have not been established first. Specifics of the changes to be made, and the how, when, and where, and individual organisations responsible for providing those changes need to be presented alongside the projections of things like 50 houses per year in the rollout plan in order to assess how the figure of 1500 houses was arrived at and how such expansion can be supported.

Unless there is a legal obligation to provide the infrastructure before or during the build then all that will happen is 50 houses per year will be built and nothing will be done until something breaks - if then. This has been my experience in this and other areas.

It is unclear as to why West Horndon is considered to be the target for such large development with its known infrastructure problems such as flooding, drainage, sewerage, road/rail capacity etc., yet areas in the north of the borough with those same issues are not. The statement that necessary infrastructure changes can be made could equally apply to those areas north of the borough as well as West Horndon.

Scale of the Proposed Expansion
West Horndon is currently a small rural village of low density development surrounded by open spaces. In the core of the village there are around 500 houses, with more in outlying areas, making it a well sought after location.

Adding 1500 homes to the village core would nearly quadruple its size, and treble the size of the parish. It would effectively turn West Horndon into a town, destroying its rural setting and character, eroding the community spirit and significantly reducing house prices as the reasons for West Horndon being a sought after location would no longer exist.

Green Belt
A large proportion of the 1500 houses are proposed to be built on site 037, which is Green Belt land, indeed Metropolitan Green Belt land. National planning policy indicates that such land should be permanently open, and housing development is considered an inappropriate use for such land except in exceptional circumstances. The Brentwood Borough Local Plan does not detail what the exceptional circumstances are to justify releasing Metropolitan Green Belt land.
If those houses get built on such land, developers will have a powerful case to build more homes on adjacent green belt land once the precedent is set. Once this starts to happen, the boundaries of West Horndon will be forgotten and its periphery will become a sprawl of housing out of all proportion to the village centre.

The Brentwood Borough Local Plan not only seems to conflict with National Planning Policy on Green Belt retention but actively seems to encourage more than just this "one-off" release of Green Belt with the inclusion of the statement on the first page of Policy CP4: West Horndon Opportunity Area which begins "West Horndon could give rise to further capacity..."

Mixed Use Development
Policy CP4 mentions the mixed use of the land for housing, employment, retail, community, open space, education and health purposes in various different sections of the policy. It also mentions encouraging local employment to reduce travel, particularly by car.

However, the closure of most of the industrial units in the brownfield sites of 020 and 021 on the plan to make way for the homes, and the relocation of the businesses to the former M25 works site 010A, will slash local employment opportunities within walking distance of the village and create the need for additional traffic (even if the "Green route", whatever that is supposed to be, does ever materialise) as there is no rail link to site 010A and the site is definitely not within walking distance of the village.

There is no mention in the plan for any other uses of the land in sites 020, 021, and 037, except for housing.

Gypsy and Traveller Provision
The initial estimated 14 traveller pitches is out of proportion to the much smaller allocations elsewhere. West Horndon would be taking nearly half of the total pitch requirements.

No indication has been given as to where the 14 pitches are to be located. As National Planning Policy states that the use of Green Belt for traveller/gipsy sites is classes as inappropriate development, that leaves just the brownfield sites of 020 and 021.

A rail link in the form of West Horndon station has been one of the reasons given for attracting potential development. But in the case of travellers and gypsies this is irrelevant due to the nature of the people and their work.

Nearby access to facilities such as primary schools and secondary schools is another requirement for such a site. West Horndon has a very limited range of amenities and facilities. It has very few shops, even less that are actually open, a primary school which is at full capacity now and no secondary school.

Healthcare is another requirement. The limited hours of opening and service provided by the surgery in the village cannot meet the needs of the existing residents now.

The village is remote from the larger centres of Brentwood, Basildon and Upminster.

Such a site would harm the character and appearance of the village and result in an unacceptable visual impact. House prices in the area would plummet. The events of Dale Farm have proved how a supposed limit of a legal number of pitches can mushroom out of control. Even today on Oak Farm, the remaining legal part of the Dale Farm settlement, a large number of travellers are cluttering up the area far in excess of the legal permitted maximum and have been doing so since the Dale Farm eviction.

Given the above, the travellers with their larger than average families, could soon start overwhelming such a small rural village as West Horndon.

The above points illustrate why West Horndon is not a suitable location for a travellers' site.

AGREE TO DEVOLPMENTS IN THESE AREAS BELOW

Area 126 - East of West Horndon, South of Station Road to A128 (Note that this area was also set for development in the 1950's with plans for residential and roads) This could result in approximately 100 properties
Area 038 - East of Thorndon Ave, North of Station Road. (This area had development plans for residential and roads in the 1950's) This could result in approximately 100 properties
Area 048 - Elliots at junction of A127 and A128 including South towards Station Road (Area 038) This could result in approximately 500 properties
Area - East of A128 towards Laindon including Timmermans Garden Centre (who wants to move) and South towards Dunton Hills Golf Course. This could result in approximately 200 properties


AGAINST DEVELOPENT IN THESE AREAS BELOW
Area 020 & 021 - West Horndon Industrial Park and Childerditch Industrial Park (Wolsey Site) consists of small Industrial units. However TNT & other companies who use Station Road for their 40 ton lorries should be encouraged to move to Brentwood Enterprise Park at Junction 28 of the M25, South of the A127
Some employers should be allowed to stay because if the sites were to be ONLY residential, this would remove employment opportunities within the local West Horndon area.

Area 037 - Nutty's Farm (Green Belt) 1000 residential properties. Why not 500, why not 5000. The area concerned is farmland so ANY NUMBER OF RESIDENCES COULD BE BUILT. This area goes against a policy on Page 46/7 as follows: This development will cause MAJOR changes.

The general extent of the Green Belt across the Borough will be retained subject to minor allocations. The following settlements are excluded from the Green Belt as identified on the Policies Map:

Blackmore, Brentwood, Doddinghurst, Herongate, Hook End, Ingatestone, Ingrave, Kelvedon Hatch, Mountnessing, Stondon Massey, West Horndon and Wyatts Green.

SECTION on Page 145 - 14 Gypsy and Traveller Sites are to be located in West Horndon area. This contravenes all parts below:-

a. The site does not give rise to unacceptable harm to the Green Belt - It will affect the Green Belt!
b. The site is well related to existing communities and accessible to local services and facilities, such as shops, primary and secondary schools, healthcare and public transport - Wrong! The West Horndon School is full & has a waiting list. The Doctor at present cannot give enough appointments. Public transport buses to Brentwood is a joke. Access to A127 & A128 at peak times is terrible and cause major delays almost every day
c. The site is serviced by a suitable access road - Where is this access road? Why not build a new access road from A127 to West Horndon Industrial Park to alleviate the heavy lorries. Because it is too expensive!
d. The location would not result in unacceptable living conditions for its occupants - Wrong!
e. The proposed accommodation would not harm the character and/or appearance of the area and/or result in unacceptable visual impact - Wrong!
f. The site is located, designed and landscaped to minimise any impact on the environment - Wrong!!

I conducted a survey 6 years ago with the travellers when they were adjacent to South Essex Golf Course just North of the A127 and East of A128. They did not want to be in West Horndon! Also a major clear up expense occurred after they were evicted. So much for NO UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS.

FLOODING - Page 164 of the Report is unacceptable because:-
4.160 Brentwood Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA, 2010) maps flood risk zones in the Borough, with surface water flooding shown most notably on the A12 North West of Brentwood and on roads around Ingatestone. Incidences of fluvial (river) flooding are recorded along the eastern boundary of the River Wid and from Stondon Hall Brook and the River Roding to the North of the Borough. Areas at risk of fluvial flooding in the Borough are mainly rural, and include low lying areas south of the A127 west and east of West Horndon

Development of the areas 037, 038, 048 and 126 in the Report MUST be flood plain areas at present in view of the 3 major floodings that have occurred over the years. What proposals are there to deal with this problem?

Lastly, there is a proposed bus route along Thorndon Avenue out onto the A127 to the new Brentwood Enterprise Park at Junction 28 of the M25, South of the A127 and to the Codham Hall Industrial Park.

A BUS COULD NOT PULL OUT ONTO THE A127 AT ANYTIME OF DAY! IT WOULD BE DANGEROUS ESPECIALLY IN RUSH HOURS. I presume nobody actually looked at this scheme to aid the move of the West Horndon Industrial Park.

Overall there are some areas that are good for residential homes but flood schemes must be done before the development takes place

Alternative areas should be considered for Major developments include Shenfield (because of Cross Rail) and all the advantages that this super rail link would bring. Also house prices in this area would probably increase if the correct type of residences was built. Also Ingatestone and Mountnessing have good opportunities for residential housing.

1. Large scale development.
West Horndon currently has approximately 750 homes, this proposal will effectively treble the size of the village. It would therefore no longer be a village and its character and ethos will be lost and changed totally. We have chosen to live in West Horndon because of the type of village it is and this large scale development will completely ruin that and possibly reduce the value of the existing properties in the process.

The proposal to build a large estate behind existing properties will block views residents currently have and their outlook will just be over houses. There will consequently be a loss of large expanse of countryside and also we will lose the wide variety of wildlife that are currently seen in and around the village. We feel that no consideration has been given to wildlife issues.

We are being asked to comment on these proposals when there are no details for us to comment on, only boundaries and location of the proposed site and the number of homes it might contain.

2. Distribution of new homes throughout the Borough.
Looking at the distribution of the new homes for the Brentwood area it is obvious that the distribution is extremely unfair. Why are there so many new homes proposed for the south of the borough? There is no justification for such a large proportion of the allocation to be built at West Horndon. There must be other suitable areas e.g homes could be built on the Hutton industrial estate if that was moved as it is proposed to move the West Horndon industrial site. The Hutton site is near many facilities that are far better than the existing facilities in West Horndon e.g.shops, bus links and, Shenfield station with far more frequent trains.

3. Traffic problems.
The proposal is for 1500 new homes. Given that in general there are 1 or 2 vehicles per home this will mean an extra 2,000 vehicles going into and out of West Horndon. This will result in a higher volume of traffic going along Station Road and Thorndon Avenue. This will result in more traffic noise and pollution along both roads. It will also lead to queues of traffic trying to get onto the A127 and the A128 especially during the rush hour. The queues on the A128 may also cause problems on the flyover over the A127 causing further congestion. There is already a problem with speeding along Station Road and Thorndon Avenue and this will undoubtedly increase with all the extra vehicles. The council have not shown any evidence of plans to improve the roads to cope with the extra traffic.

4. Property values.
New properties that have been built in West Horndon in the last few years have taken a long time to be sold why do the council think that this will change? Especially as it is also proposed to have a 14 Traveller sites in or near to West Horndon. The reality is that if prospective buyers are considering a new property in West Horndon then as soon as they hear of the traveller proposal they will buy elsewhere. It is a fact that a Traveller site will reduce the value of properties in that area - as evidenced in Crays Hill where Basildon council has put properties in Crays Hill in a lower council tax band.

5.Medical facilities.
We cannot always get a doctors appointment on the same day now with 750 homes, how long will we have to wait if the planned development goes ahead? The Health Authority have no plans to increase our medical facilities if this development goes ahead.

6. Public transport.
Extra people will mean more commuters on the trains. c2c currently have no plans to increase the frequency of the trains or to increase the number of coaches during rush hour. The trains are already very crowded at rush hour so extra people will make the situation intolerable. Rail travel from West Horndon does not cater for journeys within the borough the stations either side of West Horndon are in different boroughs.

The bus service is very infrequent and does not run in the evenings. The lack of public transport to other parts of the borough mean that residents of West Horndon will have to rely on their own transport - thus creating extra traffic day and night. There are not many people that would be able to cycle all the way to Brentwood - even if a "Green route" is developed.

The Brentwood Local Plan justification for siting so many new homes at West Horndon is that it has "good road and rail access". This only applies for the current size of the village. If it is tripled in size then the road and rail access is inadequate and major investment would be need in both to bring them up to the standard required to provide an adequate service.

7. Loss of Green Belt.
The planned development is mainly on metropolitan green belt. This was originally set up by the government to expressly stop urban sprawl and keep land permanently open. As per the National Planning Policy Framework that states "exceptional circumstances must exist to justify loss of green belt" the government have recently stated that housing demand is unlikely to constitute exceptional circumstances.

8. Risk of flooding.
The planned development is on a flood plain - how can homes be built on such an area? Some residents have already been turned down by insurance companies because of the flooding only as recent as last Christmas. The village has been flooded in 1958, 1981 and 2012. There is no evidence that the council have carried out any assessment of drainage in the area. Even the Environment Agency's website shows West Horndon and Bulphan as being at risk if flooding. There are already problems with drainage, sewage how can extra homes be built without major improvements?

9. Local school.
The school is at full capacity. There will be no spaces at the local school for all the extra children.

10. Hospital facilities.
With so many new homes proposed in West Horndon and locally in Thurrock, Basildon hospital will not be able to cope with all the extra demands that will be placed on it. This will mean that people will have to travel further afield for treatment and other hospitals such as Queen's are struggling to cope with existing numbers of people that require treatment.


11. Crime.
Obviously with an increase in population, comes with it an increase in the crime rate, something which at the moment is low as per many VILLAGES. Also with the current economic climate it would be most unlikely that police resources could cope.

12. The Borough Council is expecting people to comment on a sketchy, poorly researched plan. It should therefore carry out a study of West Horndon focusing on infrastructure, services, amenities and public transport. Only after this has been done can it be said that the plan is responding to the needs of the local community. The local community has had little input into the plan. This is against the government guidelines of " Early and meaningful engagement and collaboration with neighbourhoods, local organisations and business is essential".

See attached

See attached

With regard to the Local Development Planning and any proposed development in Blackmore Essex, we feel as residents in Woollard Way, any development on the Green Belt field would severely alter Blackmore Village status, the very reason we chose to live here.

If there is a demand for affordable housing, could some homes be built as infill building, and use Brownfield sites as a preferred option. As the village is a rural location we would like to see this remain that way. We understand the possible need for some building, but would expect this to reflect the rural surroundings and be small scale, whilst enabling the Green Belt land to remain protected.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.

Petition Against the Release of Green Belt Land for Development in Mountnessing
We, the undersigned residents of Mountnessing are OPPOSED to the proposal to use the green belt land adjacent to Mountnessing Primary School for future development for housing as proposed in the Local Development Plan.
We feel strongly that we need to protect and secure our green belt land in Brentwood and also here in Mountnessing for the future well being of the town.
There are many brownfield plots around the Brentwood area that are also being proposed for development under this Local Development Plan, we believe that these sites should be fully utilized before any further discussions are had regarding the releasing of any green belt land for development.