Support

Representation ID: 14478

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Deana Adansi

Policy 9.11 for redevelopment of brownfield land in the Green Belt is supported with explanatory paragraphs.

Support

Representation ID: 14485

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Chris Edwards

Policy 9.11 for redevelopment of brownfield land in the Green Belt is supported with explanatory paragraphs.

Object

Representation ID: 14763

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Joseph Manning

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Object to criteria (a) there are other types of developments, such as showmen's plots or travellers pitches, which may also be suitable to be listed in the policy. Furthermore PPTS clearly indicates that the Council should attach weight to, among other things, the effective use of previously developed land in considering applications for plots and pitches, which may also be located within the Green Belt. Coupled with the NPPF which indicates LPAs should plan to use derelict land positively, but does not specify or restrict it to specific uses such as housing.

As such, we request that the policy be changed to allow for all suitable uses to be encouraged in the Green Belt. The Green Belt at Chequers Road which would be suitable for redevelopment as a showmen's yard, and respectfully request its allocations for such in Policy 7.10 in accordance with Policy 9.11.

Object

Representation ID: 14765

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Joseph Manning

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Para 9.72 & 9.74 - These only reference the ability to developed housing on previously developed land, whereas the Council should set criteria to allow for any suitable development on previously developed land, including pitches and plots to ensure it is in line with PPTS. We request that the paragraphs also refer to other suitable uses being acceptable in the Green Belt. Should the Council wish to target housing on PDL in the Green Belt, additional paragraphs should be added to that effect without hindering other suitable uses from re-using PDL in the Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 15266

Received: 29/04/2016

Respondent: Tesco Stores Limited

Agent: GL Hearn

Support Policy 9.11, as this policy direction recognises latest Government announcements and consultation of the NPPF which recognise the important role that brownfield sites will play towards accelerating housing delivery. Any brownfield opportunities in the Green Belt should be maximised. Therefore it is recommended that the Council acknowledge the fact that the site at Sawyers Hall Lane is a part brownfield site in the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 15443

Received: 06/05/2016

Respondent: JTS Partnership LLP

NPPF provides that "the limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed sites, whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land within it than the existing development" can be appropriate development in the Green Belt. Where the draft policy is generally consistent with this guidance it needs to introduce warranted and justified additional criteria (particularly relating to 'sustainability').

Policy is contradictory to the Brownfield Register, which is currently progressing through the House of Lords, and the intentions of the Government to ensure that 90% of brownfield land is redeveloped for housing by 2020.

Comment

Representation ID: 15738

Received: 11/05/2016

Respondent: Wyevale Garden Centres Ltd

Agent: Greogory Gray Associates

Draft Policy 9.11 provides in part for the redevelopment of brownfield sites within the Green Belt, however no provision is made for the expansion of existing businesses through the limited extension, alteration or replacement of an existing building or limited infilling within a previously developed site.

Object

Representation ID: 15956

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: Collins & Coward Ltd

Agent: Collins Coward

Policy 9.11 go beyond the NPPF and should be deleted.

Support

Representation ID: 16009

Received: 13/05/2016

Respondent: St Modwen Properties PLC

Number of people: 2

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

We support the redevelopment of previously developed sites (brownfield) within
the Green Belt. Strategic brownfield sites such as the Brentwood Enterprise Park will of course also be removed from the Green Belt as part of the plan and therefore we consider the policy and/or supporting text should make clear that the more detailed criteria within this policy will not apply to such sites.

Support

Representation ID: 16223

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Landmere Carwash

Support redevelopment in brownfield land in Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 16236

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Mr Paul Day

Support redevelopment in brownfield land in Green Belt.

Support

Representation ID: 16250

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Time 4 pets

Support redevelopment in brownfield land in Green Belt.