Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9914

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Ellingford

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial/Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Infrastructure: 2.5
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

Q1: Yes.

Q2: Yes.

Q3: Yes - I think you have highlighted the problems of each area very well. As a volunteer for Brentwood Community Transport, I know only too well about the transport problems in the north of the borough!

Q4: The most appropriate location for growth would seem to be the A127 corridor although judicious use of brownfield sites in the A12 corridor could be an option.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: I think that it is obviously better to develop brownfield sites but it might be necessary in some cases to use some greenfield sites, possibly where they overlap.

Q7: Yes.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: No.

Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 4

Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Infrastructure: 2.5
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Yes - I think you have prioritised all the main infrastructure issues.

Q13: The priorities for spending are as you list them in the consultation document i.e. Education, Healthcare, Transport, Community Facilities, Green Infrastructure.
You have a difficult balancing act providing homes for the future and protecting our lovely surroundings. Good Luck.

Attachments: